Other descriptive methods

There are six or seven other descriptive analysis methods described in the sensory literature. The methods include Flavor Profile (CairuCTOSS and Sjdstrom, 1950) or its current version. Spectrum Analysis (Meilgaard et al., 2006), Texture Profile (Brandt et al., 1963), Free Choice Profiling (Williams and Arnold, 1985), and its successor Hash Descriptive Analysis (Dairou and Sieffermann, 2002). There are other methods described in the literature, but all appear to be based on methods previously described. 

The primary focus of current method development, as described by Dairou and Sieffermann (2002), has been to avoid the long and costly process of nsing traditional methods. In the case of the Flavor and Texture Profile methods, both of which specified 14 weeks to select and train a panel, such a time frame is too long in today s business environment. One of the reasons for developing the QDA method was this unusually long time requirement to develop a panel. The QDA method reduced that time to 8 days (or sessions) and the data collection time depended on the number of products and replications. It was also developed as a quantitative method and incorporated the repeated trials to allow for the various analyses already described. A Flavor Profile test required a single session because no data are obtained only a consensus judgment, a summary of the subjects opinions reported by the PL who, by the way, also functioned as a subject. 

---

The most commonly used semiempirical for describing PES s is the diatomics-in-molecules (DIM) method. This method uses a Hamiltonian with parameters for describing atomic and diatomic fragments within a molecule. The functional form, which is covered in detail by Tully, allows it to be parameterized from either ah initio calculations or spectroscopic results. The parameters must be fitted carefully in order for the method to give a reasonable description of the entire PES. Most cases where DIM yielded completely unreasonable results can be attributed to a poor fitting of parameters. Other semiempirical methods for describing the PES, which are discussed in the reviews below, are LEPS, hyperbolic map functions, the method of Agmon and Levine, and the mole-cules-in-molecules (MIM) method. 

Method of Moments The first step in the analysis of chromatographic systems is often a characterization of the column response to sm l pulse injections of a solute under trace conditions in the Henry s law limit. For such conditions, the statistical moments of the response peak are used to characterize the chromatographic behavior. Such an approach is generally preferable to other descriptions of peak properties which are specific to Gaussian behavior, since the statisfical moments are directly correlated to eqmlibrium and dispersion parameters. Useful references are Schneider and Smith [AJChP J., 14, 762 (1968)], Suzuki and Smith [Chem. Eng. ScL, 26, 221 (1971)], and Carbonell et al. [Chem. Eng. Sci., 9, 115 (1975) 16, 221 (1978)]. 

Other authors have used dipole moments as an auxiliary technique to other physicochemical methods. Thus, Lumbroso has studied the tautomerism of 5-(p-aryl)tetrazoles in function of the substituent at the para position and compared the results with those obtained by NMR spectroscopy (Section VT,C) (80JHC1373). For a detailed description of Lum-broso s technique see [81JST(77)239]. 

There are several ways to describe the chemical composition of a mixture of gases. The simplest method is merely to list each component with its partial pressure or number of moles. Two other descriptions, mole fractions and parts per million, also are used frequently. 

Migrating only the raw data - the characters, numbers, bits, and bytes - forward is not enough to ensure usability. The meta data and the context for the application or database must also be migrated forward. Meta data are the code to the machine-stored bits and bytes. Meta data are the data about the data. They describe the data in the database. The meta data documentation describes the method of data capture, the application used to access the data, security rules for the tables and columns, and other descriptive and procedural information. For derived or calculated data, the algorithm or protocol that was used must be known. The documentation then becomes something else that must be preserved. Without the meta data, the reader will only see a series of alphabetic characters. Without the entire described context associated with the data, the data have no meaning. 

Scanning electron microscopy and other experimental methods indicate that the void spaces in a typical catalyst particle are not uniform in size, shape, or length. Moreover, they are often highly interconnected. Because of the complexities of most common pore structures, detailed mathematical descriptions of the void structure are not available. Moreover, because of other uncertainties involved in the design of catalytic reactors, the use of elaborate quantitative models of catalyst pore structures is not warranted. What is required, however, is a model that allows one to take into account the rates of diffusion of reactant and product species through the void spaces. Many of the models in common use simulate the void regions as cylindrical pores for such models a knowledge of the distribution of pore radii and the volumes associated therewith is required. 

This is the deliverable of the analysis phase, though it can be somewhat more detailed than the traditional deliverables of analysis, so as to provide a less ambiguous and more consistent understanding of what is required of the system. A feature of an OO analysis (by contrast with other rigorous methods) is that the description centres on a type model derived from the business model it is therefore easier to relate to the business, especially when changes need to be made. 

Very rarely are measurements themselves of much use or of great interest. The statement "the absorption of the solution increased from 0.6 to 0.9 in ten minutes", is of much less use than the statement, "the reaction has a half-life of 900 sec". The goal of model-based analysis methods presented in this chapter is to facilitate the above translation from original data to useful chemical information. The result of a model-based analysis is a set of values for the parameters that quantitatively describe the measurement, ideally within the limits of experimental noise. The most important prerequisite is the model, the physical-chemical, or other, description of the process under investigation. An example helps clarify the statement. The measurement is a series of absorption spectra of a reaction solution the spectra are recorded as a function of time. The model is a second order reaction A+B->C. The parameter of interest is the rate constant of the reaction. 

Electron dynamic scattering must be considered for the interpretation of experimental diffraction intensities because of the strong electron interaction with matter for a crystal of more than 10 nm thick. For a perfect crystal with a relatively small unit cell, the Bloch wave method is the preferred way to calculate dynamic electron diffraction intensities and exit-wave functions because of its flexibility and accuracy. The multi-slice method or other similar methods are best in case of diffraction from crystals containing defects. A recent description of the multislice method can be found in [8]. 

The final move of the Methods section involves the description of statistical, computational, or other mathematical methods used to derive or analyze data. This move is required only if numerical methods were part of the work. Excerpts 3W... 

Before we go through the organometalUc or metal organic route to the synthesis of nanoparticles, a brief description of other synthetic methods is given below. 

There are a wide variety of other synthetic methods for the preparation of oxetanes however, most of these are not very general. They frequently require starting materials which are difficult to prepare, and rarely give high yields (never as high as the better photochemical preparations). It is clear then that in comparison with the alternative methods of oxetane synthesis, the photocycloaddition reaction is more generally useful and convenient. This synthetic utility justifies a brief description of experimental conditions. 

As in the case of the ground-state MMCC and CR-CC methods [49,50,52,61-63,65-77], the key to a successful description of excited states by the CR-EOMCCSD(T) and other MMCC methods is the very good control of accuracy that all of these methods offer by directly addressing the quantity of interest, which is the difference between the exact, full Cl, and EOMCC (e.g., EOMCCSD) energies. The MMCC formalism provides us with precise information about the many-body structure of these differences, suggesting several useful types of noniterative corrections to EOMCCSD or other EOMCC energies. 

Result validation and reliability, self-descriptiveness and the simple way of carrying out the analysis make the suggested method and the sensor a good alternative to other known methods and sensors for AOA measurement. 

Mass transfer can alter the observed kinetic parameter of enzyme reactions. Hints of this are provided by non-linear Lineweaver-Burk plots (or other linearization methods), non-linear Arrhenius plots, or differing Ku values for native and immobilized enzymes. Different expressions have been developed for the description of apparent Michaelis constants under the influence of external mass transfer limitations by Homby (1968) [Eq. (5.69)], Kobayashi (1971), [Eq. (5.70)], and Schuler (1972) [Eq. (5.71)]. 

The main objection to the use of CMs to describe the solvent effect of an interfacial environment is that such a model neglects the specific effects arising from the interface, thus preventing a faithful description. It is therefore important to test the model and to compare the results obtained with those from other theoretical methods (e.g. simulations) and experiments. 

---