Ohmic drop in the electrolytes

In Equation (7.16), IR represents the energy dissipation related to ohmic drops in the electrolytic cell. These include a number of contributions electrolyte, electrodes and electrical connections. The total resistance between the anode and... 

The secondary current distribution is calculated by including the effects of the ohmic drop in the electrolyte and the effects of sluggish electrode kinetics. While the secondary distribution may be a more realistic approximation, its calculation is more difficult therefore, we need to assess the relative importance of electrode kinetics to determine whether we can neglect them in a simulation. 

If the reference electrode is correctly placed in the same equipotential as the working electrode, ohmic drop in the electrolyte may be negligible, but this may not be the situation in the bulk of the electrode. Quantitative determination of the electrode resistance is difficult when using voltammetry only. It is much easier using galvanostatic cycling. 

The main purpose of this contribution, however, is to review recent advances in solid state ionics achieved by means of microelectrodes, i.e. electrodes whose size is in the micrometer range (typically 1-250 pm). In liquid electrolytes (ultra)-microelectrodes are rather common and applied for several reasons they exhibit a very fast response in voltametric studies, facilitate the investigation of fast charge transfer reactions and strongly reduce the importance of ohmic drops in the electrolyte, thus allowing e.g. measurements in low-conductive electrolytes [33, 34], Microelectrodes are also employed to localize reactions on electrodes and to scan electrochemical properties of electrode surfaces (scanning electrochemical microscope [35, 36]) further developments refer to arrays of microelectrodes, e.g. for (partly spatially resolved) electroanalysis [37-39], applications in bioelectrochemistry and medicine [40, 41] or spatially resolved pH measurements [42], Reviews on these and other applications of microelectrodes are, for example, given in Ref. [33, 34, 43-47],... 

The current efficiency increases with increasing anode-cathode distance, because for a longer anode-cathode distance there is less convection, less interaction between gas bubbles and the metal, and more stable conditions. It was found that the current efficiency is independent of the anode-cathode distance above a certain distance. However, the ohmic drop in the electrolyte increases with the interpolar distance, so the cell voltage increases. These two factors influence the energy efficiency in an opposite manner. Furthermore, the heat balance of the cell sets limits to the variation of the anode-cathode distance. 

Distributed resistance due to the ohmic drop in the electrolyte within the catalyst layer... 

The model has been applied to multiple well situations where there is the possibility of interference between the wells. Results have been presented where not only the ohmic drop in the electrolyte is considered but also the IR drop in the power supply cables, flow lines and other associated equipment and structures is modelled. 

Another cell design strictly directed toward minimization of the ohmic drop in the electrolyte, especially if gases are developed at the electrodes, is the zero-gap cell, shown in Fig. 8 [17, 93, 94]. The perforated electrodes are pressed directly onto the diaphragm by the current collectors providing optimum contact across the whole electrode area. However, uneven... 

In this paper we describe a model of a cup plater with a peripheral continuous contact and passive elements that shape the potential field. The model takes into account the ohmic drop in the electrolyte, the charge-transfer overpotential at the electrode surface, the ohmic drop within the seed layer, and the transient effect of the growing metal film as it plates up (treated as a series of pseudo-steady time steps). Comparison of experimental plated thickness profiles with thickness profile evolution predicted by the model is shown. Tool scale-up for 300 mm wafers was also simulated and compared with results from a dimensionless analysis. 

Fig. 13 Schematic of a cross section of a macroscopicaUy flat surface electrode, indicating the impedance elements. Three different impedances are represented Zc is the impedance of the contact between the current collector (conduction substrate) and the electrode, Zi is interfacial impedance of the electrode-electrolyte interface, and Ze is the impedance corresponding to the properties of the electrolyte, which is generally given by a pure resistance element such as the one indicated in Fig. 10 (Re) and (14) (Rs) or as /fceu in (15), representing the ohmic drop in the electrolyte...

Each bench scientist must keep In mind the question of the position of the reference electrode, whenever ohmic drop In the electrolyte cannot be neglected. A schematic illustration of such a situation Is detailed In section 2.2.3 and figure 2.12. 

The diagram in figure 2.40 shows the two specific situations which involve open-circuit and short-circuit conditions. Here it can be underlined that the point for (7=0 corresponds to an ideal short circuit. Therefore, in other words it is achieved using a conductor, meaning that the ohmic drop is insignificant in this setup, which is no easy result to obtain in experimental conditions. It is worth recalling that the curves presented here correspond to systems whose ohmic drop in the electrolyte can be disregarded. 

The gavanostatic transient method can be used to measure the double layer capacity and the ohmic drop in the electrolyte between the working and reference electrodes. Figure 5.14 shows the initial variation of the potential resulting from a current step. During this period, diffusion is of little importance because its time constant is usually much larger. The electrode acts like a capacitor connected in parallel with a resistance, where the capacitor represents the double layer capacity and the parallel resistance corresponds to the transfer resistance of the electrode reaction (Section 3.5). The applied current I is the sum of the capacitive current Iq given by (5.94) and the faradaic current I-p described by the Butler-Volmer equation ... 

In the simplest case, the equivalent circuit comprised of a capacitance C and a resistance Ri connected in parallel can describe the electrical behavior of the electrodesolution interface (Chapter 3). When a current flows, an ohmic resistance Rq must be added in series to take into account the ohmic drop in the electrolyte between the reference electrode and working electrode. Equations (5.141) and (5.142) express the impedance of the equivalent circuit presented in Figure 5.26. In these equations Zq represents the impedance of the double layer. 

The in-depth interpretation of the polarization curves frequently faces difficulties related to the non-uniform distributions of current and potential on the sample surface. This nonuniformity originates from the intrinsic effect of the sliding that causes an heterogeneity of the electrochemical surface reactivity, combined with the ohmic drop in the electrolyte. A full exploitation of the polarization curves in terms of local behavior is possible only if one can model the current and potential distributions xmder sliding conditions. This brings back to the same approach as in the case of the interpretation of open circuit potential measurements. Note that the effect of non-uniform distributions on the interpretation of polarization curves was already investigated in the absence of any sliding (Law Newman, 1979 Ponthiaux et al., 1995 Tiedemann et al., 1973). 

For the current and potential distributions, the anode OH transfer is the main influencing factor without the consideration of the gas effect. It decreases the current density and increases anode overpotential along the electrodes. After the inclusion of the bubble effect, the increase of anode overpotential was found to be alleviated, but the ohmic drop in the electrolyte solution was also increased. Increasing the electrolyte velocity can reduce both concentration overpotential and electrolyte ohmic resistance, and thus increase the average output current density. 

In its initial version, the method was simple and ingenious. A constant external voltage, sufficiently high to initiate a process of nucleus formation, was applied to a two-electrode electrochemical cell containing a solution of metal ions. Then, the current of the growing metal clusters led to a sharp voltage decrease due to the ohmic drop in the electrolyte solution (Fig. 13.5.5), and, namely, the time moment... 

---