Nonionic: adsorption bonding

The structure of the surfactant. Strength of the adsorptive bond formed by the adsorbed surfactant depends on the structure of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups of the surfactant and decreases usually in the order cationic > anionic > nonionic surfactant. 

Surfactants are separated according to adsorption or partitioning differences with a polar stationary phase in NPLC. This retention of the polar surfactant moiety allows for the separation of the ethylene oxide distribution. Of all the NPLC packings that have been utilized to separate nonionic surfactants, the aminopropyl-bonded stationary phases have been shown to give the best resolution (Jandera et al., 1990). The separation of the octylphenol ethoxylate oligomers on an amino silica column is shown in Fig. 18.4. Similar to the capabilities of CE for ionic surfactants, the ethylene oxide distribution can be quantitatively determined by NPLC if identity and response factors for each oligomer are known. 

The arguments presented above lead to the conclusion that the adsorption of nonionic compounds such as halogenated hydrocarbons results primarily from "hydrophobic bonding" or, perhaps more appropriately, the hydrophobic interaction (7). The thermodynamic driving force for hydrophobic interactions is the increase in entropy resulting from the removal, or decrease, in the amount of hydration water surrounding an organic solute in water. Studies have shown that the adsorption of aliphatic amines onto clays (8)... 

Adsorption of nonionic compounds on subsurface solid phases is subject to a series of mechanisms such as protonation, water bridging, cation bridging, ligand exchange, hydrogen bonding, and van der Waals interactions. Hasset and Banwart (1989) consider that the sorption of nonpolar organics by soils is due to enthalpy-related and entropy-related adsorption forces. 

In the case of nonionic compounds, the driving forces for adsorption consist of entropy changes and weak enthalpic (bonding) forces. The sorption of these compounds is characterized by an initial rapid rate followed by a much slower approach to an apparent equilibrium. The faster rate is associated with diffusion on the surface, while slower reactions have been related to particle diffusion into micropores. 

Determinations of the adsorption isotherms for a number of organic solvent-water systems in contact with hydrocarbonaceous stationary phases have shown that a layer of solvent molecules forms on the bonded-phase surface and that the extent of the layer increases with the concentration of the solvent in the mobile phase. For example, methanol shows a Langmuir-type isotherm when distributed between water and Partisil ODS (56). This effect can be exploited to enhance the resolution and the recoveries of hydrophobic peptides by the use of low concentrations, i.e., <5% v/v, of medium-chain alkyl alcohols such as tm-butanol or tert-pentanol or other polar, but nonionic solvents added to aquo-methanol or acetonitrile eluents. It also highlights the cautionary requirement that adequate equilibration of a reversed-phase system is mandatory if reproducible chromatography is to be obtained with surface-active components in the mobile phase. 

The adsorption process, unlike antigen-antibody interactions, is nonspecific. Thus, during the incubation of the immobilized antigen or antibody with enzyme-labeled antigen or antibody, the latter binds specifically to the immobilized immune reactant, but may also be adsorbed directly onto the solid phase. This nonspecific adsorption of enzyme activity can be minimized by inclusion of a nonionic detergent such as Triton X-lOO or Tween 20. These do not interfere with the antigen-antibody reaction but prevent formation of new hydrophobic interactions between added proteins and the solid phase without disrupting to any appreciable extent the hydrophobic bonds already formed between the previously adsorbed protein and the plastic surface. 

Alternative protocols are described elsewhere (Ribeiro-Neto efal., 1985 Kopf and Woolkalis, 1991 Carty, 1994). ATP, phospholipids and small amounts of certain ionic and nonionic detergents (i.e. SDS, CHAPS, Lubrol PX) promote dissociation of the A and B protomers (Moss et a/., 1986). We do not use SDS since it denatures solubilized G proteins very easily. DTT or 3-ME are necessary to break the disulfide bonds of the A protomer. Supplementation with BSA (final concentration approx. 0.9 mg/ml) helps prevent loss of enzyme through adsorption to the walls of the tube, and ensures recovery of proteins following precipitation with sodium chloride/acetone, trichloroacetic acid (TCA), or chloroform/methanol. Furthermore, when samples are subjected to SDS-PAGE, intensities of the stained 67 kDa BSA protein bands allow rough estimation of incomplete recovery of the precipitated sample (see section 4.5). Preactivated PT should be used immediately, and enzyme left over from an experiment should be discarded, since reduced toxin has been shown to lose activity rapidly (Kaslow et a/., 1989). 

Adsorption mechanisms for retention of nonionic polar organic molecules, such as phenylcarbamates and substituted ureas used as herbicides, are illustrated in Figure 13. The great importance of hydrogen bonding in retention is suggested. Other adsorption mechanisms include van der Waals... 

Small, nonionic molecules can be separated by adsorption, reversed-phase or chemically bonded phase. Under certain circumstances it may be difficult to choose between the various alternatives (in general terms, between normal- and reversed-phase methods), although the specific feamres of each individual system have been discussed in the relevant chapters. Should any doubt persist as to the success of a particular method (e.g. as could be the case if both silica and octadecylsilane were potential separation materials), then any column which is to hand should be tried. It is better if the mobile phase is too strong to begin with. Most components are eluted by a gradient of 10-90% methanol or acetonitrile in water over octadecylsilane. The actual composition of the mobile phase at the moment of elution provides information on a suitable eluent mixture under isocratic conditions. As already mentioned in Section 4.7, the sample should not be completely insoluble in the mobile phase. 

---