Noise action levels

Following measurement of the individual stressor, evaluation can be made against known hygiene standards, e.g. Occupational Exposure Limits, noise action levels specified in the Noise at Work Regulations 1989. 

Regulation 6 imposes a general duty to reduce the risk of hearing damage to the lowest level that is reasonably practicable. Three noise action levels are defined, which determine the course of action an employer has to take if employees are exposed to noise at or above the levels. These are ... 

The Noise at Work Regulations 1989 has set action levels which must be complied with ... 

The VX bubbler method suffers from a problem that decreases recovery and contributes to a low bias. Performance is within criteria to allow use as a qualitative monitoring method by setting an action level at 0.56 time-weighted average (TWA). A 3 1 signal to noise ratio is achieved at approximately 0.5 TWA. 

The demonstration plot of the experimental site should be constructed to evaluate the effectiveness of phytoremediation. The field activities consist of site mobilization, plot layout an construction, and soil sampling combined with other agricultural practices designed secifically for phytoremediation and adapted for the conditions present at the site. The activities has to be conducted in accodance with the personal protective equipment, level of protection, action levels and other health and safety practices, i.e. hazard analysis general safety reccomendations evaluation of the mechanical, electrical, fire hazards, gas and power lines, heat stress, noise, chemical hazards. 

CFR 1910.95 Noise, hearing conservation program required above action level... 

The first action level is a daily personal noise exposure of 85 dB, expressed as 85dB(A). 

The third defined level is a peak action level of 140dB(A) or 200 Pa of pressure which is likely to be linked to the use of cartridge-operated tools, shooting guns or similar loud explosive noises. This action level is likely to be most important where workers are subjected to a small number of loud impulses during an otherwise quiet day. 

At the first action level an employee must be provided with ear protection (ear muffs or ear plugs) on request. At the second action level the employer must reduce, so far as is reasonably practicable, other than by providing ear protection, the exposure to noise of that employee. 

New regulations introduced in 2006 reduce the first action level to 80dB(A) and the second level to 85dB(A) with a peak action level of 98dB(A) or 140 Pa of pressure. Every employer must make a noise assessment and provide workers with information about the risks to hearing if the noise level approaches the first action level. They must do all that is reasonably practicable to control the noise exposure of their employees and clearly mark ear protection zones. Employees must wear personal ear protection while in such a zone. 

The exposure criterion used in these Regulations is the equivalent noise level over the working day or shift (Lep ci). Three actions levels are identified, the first action level is an lEP,d of 85 dB(A) when an employee has to be provided with hearing protection on request (Reg. 8(1)), the second action level is an exposure of 90dB(A) or more when hearing protection must be provided and worn (Reg. 8(2)) and the third level is the peak action level when a peak sound pressure level of 200 pascals occurs when hearing protection must, again, be provided and worn. 

Regulation 12 modifies section 6 of HSW to impose a duty on manufacturers and suppliers to inform customers when the noise level emitted by their product exceeds the first action level, i.e. 85dB(A) Lep. ... 

The action level for a workplace, that is the level over which noise control is required, is given in dBA, not dBhn, except for impulse noise such as that from a... 

You then need to use the nomogram below in Fig. 10.2 to work out the total noise dose, by adding up the fractions of dose each of the exposures above represent US readers should note that the action level set by law in the USA is 90 dBA, aird that U S law specifies that the permissible exposure time is reduced by half for each 5 dBA increase in sound pressure level (29 CFR 1926.52). 

Figure 10.2 Nomogram for calculation of equivalent continuous sound level, based on action level of 85dB(A). (Adapted from UK Health and Safety Executive based on 85dB(A) action level. Acknowledgement to Health and Safety Executive (1998). Reducing Noise at Work, LI 08. Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO)...

Noisy machinery should be fitted with silencers. When machinery is used in a workshop (such as woodworking machines), a noise survey should be undertaken and, if the noise levels exceed the second action level, the use of ear defenders becomes mandatory. If it is necessary to shout when talking to a nearby colleague, then the noise level is excessive and ear defenders should be worn. 

The source of noise and vibration on demolition sites will normally be caused by the use of plant and equipment, falling debris and/or explosives. Compressors, pneumatic hand-held tools, front end loaders, excavators and other equipment can create noise levels of more than the lower exposure action level of 80dB(A) and may at times create peak noise levels of more than 137 dB(C) the lower peak sound pressure action value. A noise assessment will be required and workers given ear defenders. 

The Control of Noise at Work Regulations specify exposure action levels at which the hearing of employees must be protected. The conclusion as to whether any of those levels have been breached is reached after an assessment of noise levels has been made. However, before noise assessment can be discussed, noise measurement and the statutory action levels must be described. 

If the daily noise exposure exceeds the lower action level, then a noise assessment should be carried out and recorded by a competent person. There is a very simple test which can be done in any workplace to determine the need for an assessment. 

Selection of suitable ear protection is very important since they should not just reduce sound intensities below the statutory action levels but also reduce those intensities at particular frequencies. Normally advice should be sought from a competent supplier who will be able to advise ear protection to suit a given spectrum of noise using octave band analysis . 

If it is not reasonably practicable to reduce noise exposure levels to below the lower exposure action value of 80dBALEPd then the employer is... 

In addition to the Table 4.71 noise exposure hmits, OSHA Safety and Health Standards provide the requirement that employers administer an effective hearing conservation program to protect employees who may receive 8-h TWA noise exposures exceeding 85 dBA (a noise dose exceeding 50 percent). The 8-h TWA of 85 dBA is considered the action level at which... 

Results indicate that the workers are exposed to a noise level higher than the action level defined by the Portuguese Legislation (L > 85 dB (A)). 

Regulation 4 requires that every employer shall, when any of his employees is likely to be exposed to the first action level or above, or to the peak action level or above, ensure that a competent person makes a noise assessment which is adequate for the purposes ... 

All employees exposed at or above an 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA (action level) or more are covered by this regulation (OSHA-1910.95— Noise Exposure). When you include all human senses, only vision has a higher rate of information transfer. We know that sound is the propagation, transmission, and reception of waves in some medium, usually air. Sound waves may have a single frequency or might be a combination of frequencies. Short-duration noise pulses, which can occur one time or may be repetitive, are known as impulse noise. 

Employees exposed at or above the action level will be notified of the results of the monitoring and employees or their representatives will be permitted the opportunity to observe any noise measurements. 

A baseline audiogram shall be established on employees exposed at or above the action level within 6 months of the first exposure. Employees shall be notified of the requirement that testing shall be preceded by at least 14 hours without exposure to workplace noise. Hearing protectors may be worn as a substitute to this requirement. 

---