Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular structure evaluation

X-ray diffraction (XRD) has long been successfully used to study various aspects of establishing structures in natural and synthetic polymers. It is the best tool to check whether the polymer and its modified form are crystalline, semicrystalline or amorphous. It is a well-established method for the determination of molecular structure, evaluation of crystallinity and analysis of texture. [Pg.320]

The first two kinds of terms are called derivative integrals, they are the derivatives of integrals that are well known in molecular structure theory, and they are easy to evaluate. Terms of the third kind pose a problem, and we have to solve a set of equations called the coupled Hartree-Fock equations in order to find them. The coupled Hartree-Fock method is far from new one of the earliest papers is that of Gerratt and Mills. [Pg.240]

In standard quantum-mechanical molecular structure calculations, we normally work with a set of nuclear-centred atomic orbitals Xi< Xi CTOs are a good choice for the if only because of the ease of integral evaluation. Procedures such as HF-LCAO then express the molecular electronic wavefunction in terms of these basis functions and at first sight the resulting HF-LCAO orbitals are delocalized over regions of molecules. It is often thought desirable to have a simple ab initio method that can correlate with chemical concepts such as bonds, lone pairs and inner shells. A theorem due to Fock (1930) enables one to transform the HF-LCAOs into localized orbitals that often have the desired spatial properties. [Pg.302]

The purpose of this study is only intended to illustrate and evaluate the decision tree approach for CSP prediction using as attributes the 166 molecular keys publicly available in ISIS. This assay was carried out a CHIRBASE file of 3000 molecular structures corresponding to a list of samples resolved with an a value superior to 1.8. For each solute, we have picked in CHIRBASE the traded CSP providing the highest enantioselectivity. This procedure leads to a total selection of 18 CSPs commercially available under the following names Chiralpak AD [28], Chiral-AGP [40], Chiralpak AS [28], Resolvosil BSA-7 [41], Chiral-CBH [40], CTA-I (microcrystalline cellulose triacetate) [42], Chirobiotic T [43], Crownpak CR(-i-) [28], Cyclobond I [43], DNB-Leucine covalent [29], DNB-Phenylglycine covalent [29], Chiralcel OB [28], Chiralcel OD [28], Chiralcel OJ [28], Chiralpak OT(-i-) [28], Ultron-ES-OVM [44], Whelk-0 1 [29], (/ ,/ )-(3-Gem 1 [29]. [Pg.120]

The raw output of a molecular structure calculation is a list of the coefficients of the atomic orbitals in each LCAO (linear combination of atomic orbitals) molecular orbital and the energies of the orbitals. The software commonly calculates dipole moments too. Various graphical representations are used to simplify the interpretation of the coefficients. Thus, a typical graphical representation of a molecular orbital uses stylized shapes (spheres for s-orbitals, for instance) to represent the basis set and then scales their size to indicate the value of the coefficient in the LCAO. Different signs of the wavefunctions are typically represented by different colors. The total electron density at any point (the sum of the squares of the occupied wavefunctions evaluated at that point) is commonly represented by an isodensity surface, a surface of constant total electron density. [Pg.700]

The values of Go and y are known and for the elastomer of Young s modulus of 2.1 MPa, [/o = 8 X 10 mm-s [12]. We can then evaluate 8 at ca. 20 mn. This value is perhaps a little high but of the same order of magnitude as earlier estimated [6]. Thus, despite some necessary approximations and simplifying hypotheses, we arrive at a semiquantitative explanation of the relationship between dewetting and therefore, presumably, wetting speed and the molecular structure of the elastomeric substrate. [Pg.309]

The theories that attempt to describe the initial event in sweet-taste stimulation will be discussed, as will some of the practical attempts to isolate sweet-receptor molecules. Relevant, behavioral data will be examined, particularly where the effects of molecular structure on behavior responses are being evaluated. [Pg.201]

The theoretical method, as developed before, concerns a molecule whose nuclei are fixed in a given geometry and whose wavefimctions are the eigenfunctions of the electronic Hamiltonian. Actually, the molecular structure is vibrating and rotating and the electric field is acting on the vibration itself. Thus, in a companion work, we have evaluated the vibronic corrections (5) in order to correct and to compare our results with experimental values. [Pg.268]

EPA has developed an evaluation tool, the PBT Profiler, which predicts PBT potential of chemicals. The PBT Profiler estimates environmental persistence (P), bioconcentration potential (B), and aquatic toxicity (T) of discrete chemicals based on their molecular structure. It is Internet-based and there is no cost for use. [Pg.309]

Versluis, F., Ziegler, T., 1988, The Determination of Molecular Structures by Density Functional Theory. The Evaluation of Analytical Energy Gradients by Numerical Integration , J. Chem. Phys., 88, 322. [Pg.304]

Most of the work on correlation of molecular structure with bioactivity in witchweed seed germination has been produced by two groups (7-10). Johnson, et al. (7-9) prepared and evaluated a large number of strigol analogs and many approached the activity of strigol. In many studies by others, the results of the bioassays are presented, but the compounds from Johnson are described only by GR-number. GR-7 and -24, probably the more promising of these compounds, have been used in extensive field studies, and their structures are known. [Pg.450]

This article is an attempt at evaluating new important features of tin(II) chemistry the central point is the interrelationship between molecular structure and reactivity of molecular tin(II) compounds. To define these compounds more closely, only those are discussed which are stable, monomeric in solvents and which may be classified as carbene analogs21. Thus, not a complete survey of tin(II) chemistry is given but stress is laid on the structures and reactions of selected compounds. A general introduction to the subject precedes the main chapters. For comparison, also solid-state tin(II) chemistry is included to demonstrate the great resemblance with molecular tin(II) chemistry. Tin(II) compounds, which are either generated as intermediates or only under definite conditions such as temperature or pressure, are not described in detail. [Pg.8]

Both commercial grade and pure nonionic and anionic surfactants have been evaluated by phase inversion and optimal salinity screening procedures to establish relationships to their molecular structures. [Pg.307]

In a recent evaluation of this phenomenon, the whiteness indices given by eleven individual brighteners on polyester were compared with those of their binary mixtures in various ratios. In many cases the whiteness performance of a mixture was markedly superior to that shown by the individual components [57]. A more specific investigation was confined to a series of benzoxazole FBAs. Their fluorescence spectra and fluorescence lifetimes were determined individually and in mixtures. The relationships between molecular structure and photophysical properties were discussed [58]. [Pg.329]

For the evaluation of a possible relationship between the molecular structure of a potential candidate and its transport abilities to cross the epithelial membrane of the gut, the mechanism or route of transport must be known [1,4]. This is due to the structural requirements for the transcellular route being different from the paracellular route. During the lead optimization phase - when many mechanistically based studies are performed - the cell culture-based models can also be used with great confidence. [Pg.111]

About one decade ago Bass et al. [13,14] proposed first that such approach could help in exploring the structure of water dissolved silicates. Following this initiative, recently we critically evaluated how the published FTIR and Raman assignments could be adopted for differentiating between the molecular structures of some commercially available sodium silicate solutions [7-9,15], In this paper we present comparative structural studies on aqueous lithium and potassium silicate solutions as well. According to some NMR studies, the nature of A+ alkaline ion and the A+/Si ratio barely affects the structural composition of dissolved silicate molecules [5], In contrast, various empirical observations like the tendency of K-silicate solutions to be less tacky and more viscous than their Na-silicate counterparts, the low solubility of silica films obtained from Li-silicate solutions compared to those made from other alkaline silicate solutions, or the dependence of some zeolite structures on the nature of A+ ions in the synthesis mixture hint on likely structural differences [16,17]. It will be shown that vibrational spectroscopy can indeed detect such differences. [Pg.36]

An ab initio theoretical study was conducted on 1,2,5-oxadiazole and 3-phenyl-l,2,5-oxadiazole to determine the molecular structures of these heterocyclic compounds. The rotational energy barrier between Ph ring and diazole nucleus was also evaluated. No considerable change of bond lengths inside the diazole nucleus was observed in the Ph-substituted heterocyclic compounds as compared to the oxadiazole and thiadiazole alone <2001MI215>. [Pg.319]


See other pages where Molecular structure evaluation is mentioned: [Pg.198]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.779]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.736]    [Pg.1146]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.549]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.98 ]




SEARCH



Molecular evaluation

Structure evaluation

© 2024 chempedia.info