Molecular structure theory

The first two kinds of terms are called derivative integrals, they are the derivatives of integrals that are well known in molecular structure theory, and they are easy to evaluate. Terms of the third kind pose a problem, and we have to solve a set of equations called the coupled Hartree-Fock equations in order to find them. The coupled Hartree-Fock method is far from new one of the earliest papers is that of Gerratt and Mills. 

Molecular structure theory is a fast-moving subject, and a lot has happened since the First Edition was published in 1995. Chapters 3 (The Hydrogen Molecule-ion) and 4 (The Hydrogen Molecule) are pretty much as they were in the First Edition, but 1 have made changes to just about everything else in order to reflect current trends and the recent literature. I have also taken account of the many comments from friends and colleagues who read the First Edition. 

I have tried to remain true to my original brief, and produce a readable text for the more advanced consumer of molecular structure theory. The companion book Chemical Modelling from Atoms to Liquids (John Wiley Sons Ltd, Chichester, 1999) is more suitable for beginners. 

The first step defines a molecule-solvent boundary from the molecular geometry and some solvent-related quantities. This boundary is then discretized in a finite number of small elements called tesserae. This step is independent of the molecular structure theory in use (MM, DFT, MP2, etc.). 

A. Greenberg, Stereochemistry and the ether in the evolution of molecular structure theory the musings of a chemist on Moeller s supplanted screw theory , beginning with a view of the obnoxious and equally outdated cod-liver oil , J. Chem. Educ., 1993, 70, 284-286. 

But let us leave the graph theory and algebra for a while and return to chemistry. We do this to show the connection between the material discussed above and the molecular structure theory. 

Modern chemistry owes a great deal to two fundamental concepts, energy and probability, usually coupled to each other. One of the main examples of such a fruitful convergence is the field of quantum chemistry and orbital theory. The orbital concept provides the basic preparation in atomic and molecular structure theory needed for the understanding and interpretation of organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry and spectroscopy. 

As an example of a mature topic, consider Density Functional Theory (DFT). DFT is far from new and can be traced back to the work of John Slater and other solid state physicists in the 1950 s, but it was ignored by chemists despite the famous papers by Hohenberg/ Kohn (1964) and Kohn/ Sham (KS) (1965). The HF-LCAO model dominated molecular structure theory from the 1960 s until the early 1990s and I guess the turning point was the release of the rather primitive KS-LCAO version of GAUSSIAN. DFT never looked back after that point, and it quickly became the standard for molecular structure calculations. So this Volume of the SPR doesn t have a self contained Chapter on DFT because the field is mature. 

In 1969, Thomas published two papers [11,12] in which a molecular structure theory was developed without invoking the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation. In these publications and two further papers published in 1970 [13,14], Thomas studied methane, ammonia, water and hydrogen fluoride adding the kinetic energy operators of the protons to the electronic hamiltonian and using Slater-type orbitals centered on the heavier nuclei for the protonic wave functions. Over the years, a number of authors [15-23] have attempted the development of a non-Bom-Oppenheimer theory of molecular structure, but problems of accuracy and/or feasibility remain for applications to arbitrary molecular systems. 

QSAR history started a century earlier than the history of molecular descriptors, being closely related to the development of the molecular structure theories. 

There are several other schemes that have been proposed for approximating the integrals that arise in molecular structure theory. In general, the approximations are made on the two-electron integrals, the N step, but care must always be taken to ensure that the balance of one- and two-electron terms that arise in the Fock equations is maintained. We will certainly not review all of them here, but will try in this section to highlight some of the more successful ones, and, in particular, those that are based on Ruedenberg s generalization of the simple Mulliken idea. 

The Flamiltonian and most other operators in atomic and molecular structure theory can be represented usually also in the language of second quantization. For... 

Rationalization of the observed physical and chemical characteristics of organic cumulenes in terms of molecular structure theory has been beset by various difficulties. These difficulties arise in part owing to a lack of data on molecules in this series but are also due to a lack of a unified theoretical treatment that is consistent with available data on the various members of this series. (Italics added.)... 

We leave it as an exercise for the interested reader to consider the application of Brillouin-Wigner methods, together with an a posteriori extensivity correction where appropriate, to other approximation techniques in molecular structure theory. The Brillouin-Wigner approach is a very general technique which has been largely overlooked in many-body studies of molecules and which shows considerable promise for situations in which a single reference formalism is inadequate. 

The work of Isaiah Shavitt on ab initio atomic and molecular structure theory was characterized by careful attention to the details of the underlying mathematics and to its development into forms that permitted accurate digital computation. It is in that spirit that this contribution is dedicated to his memory. 

T. Helgaker, P. J0rgensen, and J. Olsen, Molecular Structure Theory, John Wiley Sons, Chichester, 2000. 

It would be wrong to interpret this work as an effort to refute the importance of quantum theory for chemistry. It does the opposite, but questions the methodology that developed from a naive interpretation of three-dimensional wave mechanics to confirm the electron-pair model of Lewis and the molecular structure theory of van t Hoff. Even in terms of the probabilistic interpretation of wave mechanics, a rigid three-dimensionally structured molecule, with its real molecular orbitals, is undefined. A strategy, based on these concepts and which became known as Quantum Chemistry, amounts to a disastrous misreading of quantum theory and has no predictive power beyond its classical basis. 

Y. Yamaguchi, Y. O.samura. J. D. Goddard, and H. F. Schaefer III. A New Dimension to Quantum Chemi.stry Analytic Derivative Methods in Ab Initio Molecular Structure Theory , Oxford University Press, New York, 1994. 

The main scientific disciplines of quantum chemistry and solid-state physics were developed by way of a mathematical simplification or approximation of the Schrodinger equation, known as the Born-Oppenheimer (B-O) approximation [1]. It does not only give the basis of almost all quantum chemical calculations, but it also provides the very concept of molecular structure [2]. There are two main contemporary trends in quantum chemistry that put a question mark over the B-O approximation and its role in the definition of (molecular) structure theories based on the incorporation of the centre-of-mass (COM) problem and applications in connection with the Jahn-Teller (J-T) effect. 

The complexity seen in the rheological properties of a branched polymer reflects the complexity of its molecular structure. Theory provides reliable predictions of the zero-shear viscosity for well-defined branching structures and for some randomly branched systems, and empirical correlations have been proposed that relate the branching level to rf. The structure of low-density polyethylene is so complex that it defies precise characterization. 

---