Modeling, mathematical simplifications

The detailed analysis of this situation should include the simultaneous radial dispersion of heat and matter, and maybe axial dispersion too. In setting up the mathematical model, what simplifications are reasonable, would the results properly model the real situation, would the solution indicate unstable behavior and hot spots These questions have been considered by scores of researchers, numerous precise solutions have been claimed however, from the point of view of prediction and design the situation today still is not as we would wish. The treatment of this problem is quite difficult, and we will not consider it here. A good review of the state-of-the-art is given by Froment (1970), and Froment and Bischoff (1990). 

While the foregoing may seem like an unnecessarily long exercise, it should provide a basic approach which can be applied to specific problems. However, remember that mathematical models require simplification. Real proteins often have more than two stable conformations.117 The entire outside surface of a protein is made up of potential binding sites for a number of different molecules, both small and large. Filling of almost any of these sites can affect the functioning of a protein. 

Fortunately, introduction of chemical approximations often leads to mathematical simplification of complex rate equations, which allows the reaction to be modelled. The following are the three most commonly used approximations. 

Prior to the advent of computers, fitting data to equation 1 was virtually Impossible. To circumvent this problem various mathematical models and simplifications were performed to develop more tractable analyses. Perhaps the most famous model Is the Gulnler... 

Amorphous polymers are much more problematic. In this case it is not possible to use the mathematical simplifications offered by the periodic systems and the only route apparent is to use a model that can explore many conformations. This inevitably leads to models with many atoms so is computationally veiy demanding. 

Square well model This is a mathematical simplification of the more realistic model possessing finite repulsions and attractions. The region of attraction is restricted to a range bounded by discontinuities at two inter-nuclear separations at the smaller of these, infinite repulsion occurs, and beyond the larger no interaction exists. 

The mathematical model most widely used for steady-state behavior of a reactor is diffusion theory, a simplification of transport theory which in turn is an adaptation of Boltzmann s kinetic theory of gases. By solving a differential equation, the flux distribution in space and time is found or the conditions on materials and geometry that give a steady-state system are determined. 

In this work the development of mathematical model is done assuming simplifications of physico-chemical model of peroxide oxidation of the model system with the chemiluminesce intensity as the analytical signal. The mathematical model allows to describe basic stages of chemiluminescence process in vitro, namely spontaneous luminescence, slow and fast flashes due to initiating by chemical substances e.g. Fe +ions, chemiluminescent reaction at different stages of chain reactions evolution. 

Empirical energy functions can fulfill the demands required by computational studies of biochemical and biophysical systems. The mathematical equations in empirical energy functions include relatively simple terms to describe the physical interactions that dictate the structure and dynamic properties of biological molecules. In addition, empirical force fields use atomistic models, in which atoms are the smallest particles in the system rather than the electrons and nuclei used in quantum mechanics. These two simplifications allow for the computational speed required to perform the required number of energy calculations on biomolecules in their environments to be attained, and, more important, via the use of properly optimized parameters in the mathematical models the required chemical accuracy can be achieved. The use of empirical energy functions was initially applied to small organic molecules, where it was referred to as molecular mechanics [4], and more recently to biological systems [2,3]. 

Therefore the author decided to create an artificial true mechanism, derive the kinetics from the mechanism without any simplification, and solve the resulting set of equations rigorously. This then can be used to generate artificial experimental results, which in turn can be evaluated for kinetic model building. Models, built from the artificial experiments, can then be compared with the prediction from the rigorous mathematical solution of the kinetics from the true mechanism. 

The structure and mathematical expressions used in PBPK models significantly simplify the true complexities of biological systems. If the uptake and disposition of the chemical substance(s) is adequately described, however, this simplification is desirable because data are often unavailable for many biological processes. A simplified scheme reduces the magnitude of cumulative uncertainty. The adequacy of the model is, therefore, of great importance, and model validation is essential to the use of PBPK models in risk assessment. 

With these simplifications, we can now formulate the mathematical model, which describes the flowshop. Let... 

The consequence of all these (conscious and unconscious) simplifications and eliminations might be that some information not present in the process will be included in the model. Conversely, some phenomena occurring in reality are not accounted for in the model. The adjustable parameters in such simplified models will compensate for inadequacy of the model and will not be the true physical coefficients. Accordingly, the usefulness of the model will be limited and risk at scale-up will not be completely eliminated. In general, in mathematical modelling of chemical processes two principles should always be kept in mind. The first was formulated by G.E.P. Box of Wisconsin All models are wrong, some of them are useful . As far as the choice of the best of wrong models is concerned, words of S.M. Wheeler of New York are worthwhile to keep in mind The best model is the simplest one that works . This is usually the model that fits the experimental data well in the statistical sense and contains the smallest number of parameters. The problem at scale-up, however, is that we do not know which of the models works in a full-scale unit until a plant is on stream. 

The mathematical model describing the two-phase dynamic system consists of modeling of the flow and description of its boundary conditions. The description of the flow is based on the conservation equations as well as constitutive laws. The latter define the properties of the system with a certain degree of idealization, simplification, or empiricism, such as equation of state, steam table, friction, and heat transfer correlations (see Sec. 3.4). A typical set of six conservation equations is discussed by Boure (1975), together with the number and nature of the necessary constitutive laws. With only a few general assumptions, these equations can be written, for a one-dimensional (z) flow of constant cross section, without injection or suction at the wall, as follows. 

Equations 12.7.48 and 12.7.39 provide the simplest one-dimensional mathematical model of tubular fixed bed reactor behavior. They neglect longitudinal dispersion of both matter and energy and, in essence, are completely equivalent to the plug flow model for homogeneous reactors that was examined in some detail in Chapters 8 to 10. Various simplifications in these equations will occur for different constraints on the energy transfer to or from the reactor. Normally, equations 12.7.48 and 12.7.39... 

Dyson introduces a series of mathematical and physical simplifications and then reaches his important conclusions. These involve the reciprocal relationship of three parameters when these are chosen, the model is completely defined. The parameters are ... 

Part I comprises three chapters that motivate the study of optimization by giving examples of different types of problems that may be encountered in chemical engineering. After discussing the three components in the previous list, we describe six steps that must be used in solving an optimization problem. A potential user of optimization must be able to translate a verbal description of the problem into the appropriate mathematical description. He or she should also understand how the problem formulation influences its solvability. We show how problem simplification, sensitivity analysis, and estimating the unknown parameters in models are important steps in model building. Chapter 3 discusses how the objective function should be developed. We focus on economic factors in this chapter and present several alternative methods of evaluating profitability. 

Detailed modeling study of practical sprays has a fairly short history due to the complexity of the physical processes involved. As reviewed by O Rourke and Amsden, 3l() two primary approaches have been developed and applied to modeling of physical phenomena in sprays (a) spray equation approach and (b) stochastic particle approach. The first step toward modeling sprays was taken when a statistical formulation was proposed for spray analysis. 541 Even with this simplification, however, the mathematical problem was formidable and could be analyzed only when very restrictive assumptions were made. This is because the statistical formulation required the solution of the spray equation determining the evolution of the probability distribution function of droplet locations, sizes, velocities, and temperatures. The spray equation resembles the Boltzmann equation of gas dynamics[542] but has more independent variables and more complex terms on its right-hand side representing the effects of nucleations, collisions, and breakups of droplets. 

The representation of surface groups as diprotic weak acids is appealing because it includes a modest degree of complexity (two acidity constants), allows convenient representation of the condition of zero surface excess of hydrogen ion, and is still quite manageable mathematically. However, it must be borne in mind that this model is still a grossly simplified representation of the actual surface. It remains to be shown that this simplification is significantly better than any other simplification. 

---