Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Square-well model

Figure A2.3.17 Theoretical (HNC) calculations of the osmotic coefficients for the square well model of an electrolyte compared with experimental data for aqueous solutions at 25°C. The parameters for this model are a = r (Pauling)+ r (Pauling), d = d = 0 and d as indicated in the figure. Figure A2.3.17 Theoretical (HNC) calculations of the osmotic coefficients for the square well model of an electrolyte compared with experimental data for aqueous solutions at 25°C. The parameters for this model are a = r (Pauling)+ r (Pauling), d = d = 0 and d as indicated in the figure.
Transition matrix estimators have received less attention than the multicanonical and Wang-Landau methods, but have been applied to a small collection of informative examples. Smith and Bruce [111, 112] applied the transition probability approach to the determination of solid-solid phase coexistence in a square-well model of colloids. Erring ton and coworkers [113, 114] have also used the method to determine liquid-vapor and solid-liquid [115] equilibria in the Lennard-Jones system. Transition matrices have also been used to generate high-quality data for the evaluation of surface tension [114, 116] and for the estimation of order parameter weights in phase-switch simulations [117]. [Pg.380]

Fig. 9.23. Square-well model for electronic mixing between two discrete states. The displacement toward resonance is derived from modulation of the energy levels by the coupling of the electronic levels to the nuclear motion of the surrounding medium. In configuration A, the electron is localized at the donor site B corresponds to the condition of quantum resonance between the two states C corresponds to the nuclear configuration in which the electron becomes localized on the acceptor site (Reprinted from R. J. D. Miller, G. McLendon, A. J. Nozik, W. Schmickler, and F. Willig, Surface Electron Transfer Processes, p. 4, copyright 1995 VCH-Wiley. Reprinted by permission of John Wiley Sons, Inc.)... Fig. 9.23. Square-well model for electronic mixing between two discrete states. The displacement toward resonance is derived from modulation of the energy levels by the coupling of the electronic levels to the nuclear motion of the surrounding medium. In configuration A, the electron is localized at the donor site B corresponds to the condition of quantum resonance between the two states C corresponds to the nuclear configuration in which the electron becomes localized on the acceptor site (Reprinted from R. J. D. Miller, G. McLendon, A. J. Nozik, W. Schmickler, and F. Willig, Surface Electron Transfer Processes, p. 4, copyright 1995 VCH-Wiley. Reprinted by permission of John Wiley Sons, Inc.)...
When a metal such as Na is dissolved in a molten salt such as NaCl, it is found that 1 mol% of the metal gives rise to significant electronic conductance. Utilize the equation k = FNu, where IV is the number of moles ofNa per cubic centimeter and u is themobility (0.4 cm V s" ). What would be the average distance apart of the Na atoms On the basis of this distance and an approximation square-well model, calculate the probability of electron tunneling between a K atom and a... [Pg.764]

In Fig. 11 we have plotted the fluidity of the hard-sphere fluid (from Alder, et al. ), together with some very recent data of Michels on the fluidity of the square-well liquid. The square-well model has a uniform attractive potential between a and 1.5 a of depth e. When we extrapolate linearly the fluidity of the square-well system, an interesting result is obtained that vindicates the inferences of the preceding section. [Pg.428]

E. Detailed Example Freezing of the Square-Well Model... [Pg.405]

Figure 4 Coexistence for the A = 1.95 square-well model Lines with open symbols follow the liquid-vapor coexistence path in the pressure-temperature plane all other lines follow the liquid-fcc coexistence path. Panel (ft) is an enlargement of (a) to highlight the triple-point region. Both pressure and chemical potential (free energy) are plotted. Arrows in (ft) point out the intersections that correspond to the triple point of vapor-liquid-fcc coexistence. A perfect integration would find these intersections at the same value of the abscissa / . Broken lines describe the chemical potentials of the hep and bcc phases as they trace the same liquid-fcc coexistence path. Figure 4 Coexistence for the A = 1.95 square-well model Lines with open symbols follow the liquid-vapor coexistence path in the pressure-temperature plane all other lines follow the liquid-fcc coexistence path. Panel (ft) is an enlargement of (a) to highlight the triple-point region. Both pressure and chemical potential (free energy) are plotted. Arrows in (ft) point out the intersections that correspond to the triple point of vapor-liquid-fcc coexistence. A perfect integration would find these intersections at the same value of the abscissa / . Broken lines describe the chemical potentials of the hep and bcc phases as they trace the same liquid-fcc coexistence path.
Fig. 2-1 Models of intermolecular potentials, (a) Forceless mass points (b) elastic hard spheres (c) elastic hard spheres with superposed central attractive forces (d) molecules with central finite repulsive and attractive forces (e) square-well model (f) point centers of inverse-power repulsion or attraction. Fig. 2-1 Models of intermolecular potentials, (a) Forceless mass points (b) elastic hard spheres (c) elastic hard spheres with superposed central attractive forces (d) molecules with central finite repulsive and attractive forces (e) square-well model (f) point centers of inverse-power repulsion or attraction.
Square well model This is a mathematical simplification of the more realistic model possessing finite repulsions and attractions. The region of attraction is restricted to a range bounded by discontinuities at two inter-nuclear separations at the smaller of these, infinite repulsion occurs, and beyond the larger no interaction exists. [Pg.26]

Figure 5.8 The pseudopotential proposed by Heine and Abarenkov that is a square-well model potential with value A inside a cutoff radius r . Figure 5.8 The pseudopotential proposed by Heine and Abarenkov that is a square-well model potential with value A inside a cutoff radius r .
J. C. Rasaiah and H. L. Friedman, Charged square-well model for ionic solutions, J. Phys. Chem. 72, 3352 (1968). [Pg.135]

The gas-solid interaetion laws explored in the numerous simulation studies of physisorption vary eonsiderably in their complexity and level of realism. One starts from the simplest case, which is that of the hard wall, which can be planar, either as a free surface or as the boundaries of a slit pore. Of course, other geometries such as the straight-walled cylindrical pore can be studied. These systems are, of course, not very realistic, but they are very valuable in helping one understand the effect of confinement on the properties of a fluid without the complications of an attractive interaction at the wall. In fact, the hard wall idea can be extended by the addition of an attractive square well next to the hard wall that gives a relatively simple representation of the adsorption process as it might be observed in real systems. Still, both the hard wall and the hard wall plus square well models yield only the basic principles of adsorption, and one must go to more realistic representations if comparisons with experimental data are the goal. [Pg.341]

Obtain the virial form of the E rigogine square-well model ... [Pg.50]

Rewrite Equation (5.20) with Prigogine square well model and discuss the ramifications of it in the phase diagram type. [Pg.121]

From eq. (4.8) one can obtain the value of the T-violating single particle matrix element in the square-well model... [Pg.94]

To calculate the amplitude connected with T violation in the process of potential scattering, we will use the square-well model approximation. Then, according to eq. (4.35), the difference of matrix... [Pg.102]

Consider the intermolecular potential curve of a molecule represented on the one hand by the hard sphere model (with repulsive wall k, s = 2.4 A) and on the other by the square well model (with well between = 2.4 A... [Pg.467]

Here two matrices of parameters are determined one for the m power, A p, and one for the n power, (m> n). The signs of the matrix elements are determined by the optimization. In physical potentials like the Lennard-Jones model we expect A p to be positive (repulsive) and to be negative (attractive). The indices m and n cannot be determined by LP techniques and have to be decided on in advance. A suggestive choice is the widely used Lennard-Jones [LJ(12,6)] model m =12, n = 6). In contrast to the square well, the LJ(12,6) form does not require a prespecification of the arbitrary cutoff distance, which is determined by the optimization. It also presents a continuous and differentiable function that is more realistic than the square well model. [Pg.82]

The above test of the models optimized on the HL set gives an unfair advantage to the THOM models that are using more parameters. Nevertheless, even this head start did not change the conclusion that the pairwise square well model better captures the characteristics of sequence fitness into structures. Without the need for efficient treatments of gaps (see Section V), the pairwise interaction model should have been our best choice. Moreover, so far THOM2 is not significantly better than THOML... [Pg.92]


See other pages where Square-well model is mentioned: [Pg.105]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.259]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.113 ]




SEARCH



Square well

© 2024 chempedia.info