Microscopy coalescence measurement

Helium bubble formation (HBF) uses electron microscopy to measure the distribution of bubble sizes that form when a solid inqtlanted with He ions is annealed [73Aitl]. For He in Nb, bubble formation occurs by migration and coalescence, not by He diffusion. Thus, the size distribution can be related to the surface diffusion coefficient, which governs bubble migratioa Spatial resolution is about 10 nm. 

Particle Formation, Electron microscopy and optical microscopy are the diagnostic tools most often used to study particle formation and growth in precipitation polymerizations (7 8). However, in typical polymerizations of this type, the particle formation is normally completed in a few seconds or tens of seconds after the start of the reaction (9 ), and the physical processes which are involved are difficult to measure in a real time manner. As a result, the actual particle formation mechanism is open to a variety of interpretations and the results could fit more than one theoretical model. Barrett and Thomas (10) have presented an excellent review of the four physical processes involved in the particle formation oligomer growth in the diluent oligomer precipitation to form particle nuclei capture of oligomers by particle nuclei, and coalescence or agglomeration of primary particles. 

The high lateral resolution down to the atomic scale is the special merit of scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy. Spatially resolved measurements at T — 10 K with a W tip coated with approximately 10 ML Fe were performed on a sample prepared by depositing 10 ML of Gd on the W(llO) substrate held at 530 K. This preparation procedure leads to partially coalesced Gd islands with a Gd wetting layer on the W(llO) substrate. 

Application of the microslide preparative technique combined with video microscopy is promising and has allowed the measurement of flie coupling of reversible flocculation and coalescence (27, 29). However, some experimental difficulties were encountered droplets could sometimes be seen sticking to flic glass surface of the microslide. 

The JKR explanation of latex coalescence was proposed in 1982. Padget had observed the hexagonal structure of coalesced rubber latex (Fig. 9.21 (a)) and Kendall had measured the contact spot sizes between latex particles using electron microscopy (Fig. 9.21(b)). When the results were plotted in Fig. 9.21(c), they fitted the JKR equation and macroscopic observations, taking the elastic modulus to be 5.64MPa and the work of adhesion to be 26.5 Jm ... 

The dimensions, shape, aspect ratio, and other morphology characteristics influence the macroscopic properties of the materials. The microstmcture of particles is frequently used to explain the viscoelastic, electric, magnetic, and optical properties. In the field of composites, microscopy is essential to measure the shape and size of particle filler inside of the polymer, but it is important to determine particle distribution, segregation, and characteristics of the interface, hi the field of colloidal polymers, the properties of particles can be studied to explain the stability, rheology, color, and coalescence. The main techniques used to characterize the microscopic stracture of polymers are scanning electron miaoscopy (SEM), TEM, scanning probe microscopy (SPM), and their related techniques. 

This tutorial will not attempt to deal with aU these ion implantation phenomena, although Mossbauer spectroscopy has been used in aU these fields. We wUl give several illustrative examples but we will mainly focus on semiconductors and to rather low implantation fluences where the implanted atoms are still isolated from each other or just start to coalesce and to form precipitates. The phenomena at high fluences and the dynamics of compound layer formation are beyond the scope of this tutorial. The reason for this limitation is that emission Mossbauer spectroscopy on radioactive probe atoms is particularly powerful in this low concentration range and allows to study the more fundamental phenomena of lattice location and defect association at the individual probe level, which is hard to study with other techniques. On the other hand, experience has shown that one has to be extremely careful in drawing conclusions from Mossbauer spectroscopy results only, as the possible interpretation of a particular Mossbauer spectrum is often not unique. Complementary data, e.g. from electron microscopy. X-ray difiEraction, transport measurements, channelUng experiments, are often more than welcome or even crucial for the interpretation of the hyperfine interaction data. 

---