Methodological evolution

Actually, when considering the time needed for subjects to complete the evaluation task, the cards are being reshuffled. Although the simplest comparative tasks, as in Free Sorting, may still be faster, monadic sequential evaluation of the samples in 

It may also be worth considering other parameters, such as the time to recruit subjects and to set up a panel, the time spent by the experimenter to collect and organize data, and the time needed for data analysis and interpretation. 

Eventually, it should be stressed that rapid does not necessarily mean instantaneous. Rather, one should consider rapid proflling methods as ways to acquire data more rapidly than with their conventional equivalents. In Chapter 20, Blumenthal and Herbeth report that in order to evaluate sensations while driving, each assessor in their study drove a total of more than 25 h and 600 km, even if they used a quicker approach than conventional proflling. The same goes with other methods TDS is not as rapid, but it is much faster than traditional time-intensity measurements the Ideal Profile Method may also take some time for the panellists, but it is clearly more rapid than a full external preference mapping study. 

A key point in the application of rapid sensory proflling methods is that they do not require an important initial investment, since there is no need to train and to maintain a panel. There is thus no need to mobilize substantial resources to run a sensory profile (except when a large consumer sample is to be recruited). In a way, those methods thus democratize access to sensory information. 

The evolution of sensory methods, and more specifically the development of rapid sensory proflling techniques, has resulted in a broad variety of available methods. The sensory toolkit is now much more complete than even a few years ago and offers several alternative solutions to the sensory practitioner to address many different objectives. When taking one step back, one become aware of the impressive number of options that underlie DA methods (Fig. 1.1). These methodological options range from the type of subjects that are included in the panel to data handling and data 

---

The following five sections review two decades of development in the MO theory of potential hypersurfaces for nucleophilic addition to carbonyls. The early results of such studies, which shaped the concepts and imagery of present-day organic chemistry, suffer from limitations that become evident as the methodological evolution and accumulation of higher level ab initio calculations continue. Our review aims to enable the reader to judge how the selection of the model system, i.e. the nature of the nucleophile, carbonyl substrate, and the medium, as well as the inherent properties of different basis sets [111] affect the outcome of the calculations. The information given about the technical aspects of the calculations is fairly detailed, for otherwise the account would fail to convey the vivid sense of the depth and scope of the transformation of this field that has occurred over the last ten or so years. 

Molecular dynamics simulation, which provides the methodology for detailed microscopical modeling on the atomic scale, is a powerful and widely used tool in chemistry, physics, and materials science. This technique is a scheme for the study of the natural time evolution of the system that allows prediction of the static and dynamic properties of substances directly from the underlying interactions between the molecules. 

Planned tools/methodologies Computer programs to simulate the evolution of the water resources and the water quality and interviews with experts to represent/quantify relationships. 

Neilands JB (1972) Evolution of Biological Iron Binding Centers. II 145-170 Neilands JB (1984) Methodology of Siderophores. 58 1-24... 

Other examples in the Gottheb and Kubitzki (1983) paper, following similar statistical methodology and logic, concern chemical changes in the evolution of Aniba (Lauraceae) in the Amazon, and associated river basins and relationships among genera of Papilionoideae as a function of their accumulated alkaloids. These are complex examples that would repay careful study by interested readers. 

Another approach to the determination of surface kinetics in these systems has been to combine molecular beams in the 10 2-10 1 mbar pressure range with the use of the infrared chemiluminescence of the C02 formed during steady-state NO + CO reactions. This methodology has been used to follow the kinetics of the reaction over Pd(110) and Pd(l 11) surfaces [49], The activity of the NO + CO reaction on Pd(l 10) was determined to be much higher than on Pd(lll), as expected based on the UHV work discussed in previous sections but in contrast with result from experiments under higher pressures. On the basis of the experimental data on the dependence of the reaction rate on CO and NO pressures, the coverages of NO, CO, N, and O were calculated under various flux conditions. Note that this approach relied on the detection of the evolution of gas-phase... 

Matrix acidizing treatments are more often performed, nowadays, with sensors and data acquisition systems continuously recording the surface pressure and rate histories. According to a recently proposed methodology (15), these records can be used to compute downhole rate and pressure evolutions. The bottomhole pressure history is then compared to the theoretical response of an equivalent reservoir wherein a non-reactive fluid would have been injected according to an identical rate schedule. Following this method, the difference between both theoretical and actual pressure responses originates from the evolution of the skin of the true reservoir under the influence of the acid attack. Equation 1 is then used to derive the skin decrease from this pressure difference. 

Keeping the lesson of the above example in mind, we will explore three different dynamical possibilities below isolated evolution, where the system evolves without any coupling to the external world, unconditioned open ev olution, where the system evolves coupled to an external environment but where no information regarding the system is extracted from the environment, and conditioned open evolution where such information is extracted. In the third case, the evolution of the physical state is driven by the system evolution, the coupling to the external world, and by the fact that observational information regarding the state has been obtained. This last aspect - system evolution conditioned on the measurement results via Bayesian inference - leads to an intrinsically nonlinear evolution for the system state. The conditioned evolution provides, in principle, the most realistic possible description of an experiment. To the extent that quantum and classical mechanics are eventually just methodological tools to explain and predict the results of experiments, this is the proper context in which to compare them. 

---