Membrane Polymer Selection

The main classes of plasticizers for polymeric ISEs are defined by now and comprise lipophilic esters and ethers [90], The regular plasticizer content in polymeric membranes is up to 66% and its influence on the membrane properties cannot be neglected. Compatibility with the membrane polymer is an obvious prerequisite, but other plasticizer parameters must be taken into account, with polarity and lipophilicity as the most important ones. The nature of the plasticizer influences sensor selectivity and detection limits, but often the reasons are not straightforward. The specific solvation of ions by the plasticizer may influence the apparent ion-ionophore complex formation constants, as these may vary in different matrices. Ion-pair formation constants also depend on the solvent polarity, but in polymeric membranes such correlations are rather qualitative. Insufficient plasticizer lipophilicity may cause its leaching, which is especially undesired for in-vivo measurements, for microelectrodes and sensors working under flow conditions. Extension of plasticizer alkyl chains in order to enhance lipophilicity is only a partial problem solution, as it may lead to membrane component incompatibility. The concept of plasticizer-free membranes with active compounds, covalently attached to the polymer, has been intensively studied in recent years [91]. 

E. Bakker, P. Buhlmann, and E. Pretsch, Polymer membrane ion-selective electrodes - what are the limits Electroanalysis 11, 915-933 (1999). 

E. Bakker, Determination of improved selectivity coefficients of polymer membrane ion-selective electrodes by conditioning with a discriminated ion. J. Electrochem. Soc. 43, L83—L85 (1996). 

Another aspect of tin as a constituent of electrode material is shown by tin(IV)TPP complexes incorporated into PVC membrane electrodes. These increase the selectivity to salicylate over anions such as Cl-, Br- I-, I()4, Cl()4, citrate, lactate and acetate. The specificity is attributed to the oxophilic character of the Sn ion in TPP at the axial coordination sites. Indeed, carboxyl groups incorporated into the membrane polymer compete for these binding sites. The complete complex structure is important. Substitution of TPP with octaethylporphirine results in loss of salicylate selectivity231. Preparation and analytical evaluation of a lead-selective membrane electrode, containing lead diethyldithiocarbamate chelate, has also been described232. 

An ion-exchange membrane consists of an ionomer, which contains fixed ions that are covalently bound to the polymer backbone. It is electrically neutral because of included counterions . If water-or probably another sufficiently polar solvent - is absorbed and if the fixed and counterions can be separately solvated to an adequate degree, the counterions become mobile and the ion-exchange membrane can work as an ion conductor. Owing to the electric field of the fixed ions coions with the same charge as the fixed ions are rejected and are typically absent inside the membrane. Thus the membrane is selective for the transfer of counterions ( permselectivity = permeation selectivity, e.g. [70]). 

Zeolite/polymer mixed-matrix membranes can be fabricated into dense film, asymmetric flat sheet, or asymmetric hollow fiber. Similar to commercial polymer membranes, mixed-matrix membranes need to have an asymmetric membrane geometry with a thin selective skin layer on a porous support layer to be commercially viable. The skin layer should be made from a zeohte/polymer mixed-matrix material to provide the membrane high selectivity, but the non-selective porous support layer can be made from the zeohte/polymer mixed-matrix material, a pure polymer membrane material, or an inorganic membrane material. 

The geometries for asymmetric mixed-matrix membranes include flat sheets, hollow fibers and thin-fihn composites. The flat sheet asymmetric mixed-matrix membranes are formed into spirally wound modules and the hollow fiber asymmetric mixed-matrix membranes are formed into hollow fiber modules. The thin-film composite mixed-matrix membranes can be fabricated into either spirally wound or hollow fiber modules. The thin-film composite geometry of mixed-matrix membranes enables selection of different membrane materials for the support layer and low-cost production of asymmetric mixed-matrix membranes utilizing a relatively high-cost zeolite/polymer separating layer on the support layer. 

Fabrication of polymer/selective-flake nanocomposite membranes and their use in gas Separation. Chem. 

Recent research in the field of polymer membrane ion-selective electrodes [389-391], has revealed that their se-lectivities [392-396] and limits of detections [394-397] could be improved by several orders of magnitude. The review of Bakker and Pretsch [398] summarized recent progress in the development and application of potentiometric sensors with low detection limit in the range 10-8-10-11 M. 

Shvedene, N.V., Chernyshov, D.V., Khrenova, M.G., Formanovsky, A.A., Baulin, V.E., and Pletnev, I.V., Ionic liquids plasticize and bring ion-sensing ability to polymer membranes of selective electrodes, Electroanal., 18,1416-1421, 2006. 

Redox potential pH Ionic activities Inert redox electrodes (Pt, Au, glassy carbon, etc.) pH-glass electrode pH-ISFET iridium oxide pH-sensor Electrodes of the first land and M" /M(Hg) electrodes) univalent cation-sensitive glass electrode (alkali metal ions, NHJ) solid membrane ion-selective electrodes (F, halide ions, heavy metal ions) polymer membrane electrodes (F, CN", alkali metal ions, alkaline earth metal ions)... 

J. Bobacka. T. Lindfors, A. Lewenstam. and A. Ivaska, All-Solid-State Ion Sensors Using Conducting Polymers as Ion-to-Electron Transducers, Am. Lab., February 2004, 13 A. Konopka, T. Sokalski, A. Michalska, A. Lewenstam, and M. Maj-Zurawska, Factors Affecting the Potentiometric Response of All-Solid-State Solvent Polymeric Membrane Calcium-Selective Electrode for Low-Level Measurement, Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 6410 M. Fouskaki and... 

Since most other modeling techniques for polymers are extremely demanding, the limited capabilities of COSMO-RS for efficient prediction of solubilities in polymers can be of great help in practical applications when suitable polymers with certain solubility requirements are desired. One application may be the selection of appropriate membrane polymers for certain separation processes. Predictions of drug solubility in polymers are sometimes of interest for pharmaceutical applications. Furthermore, it is most likely that COSMO-RS can also be used to investigate the mutual compatibility of polymers for blends. This aspect, and many other aspects of the potential of COSMO-RS for polymer modeling, still awaits systematic investigation. 

PE, being a commodity polymer, is used in its different physical forms viz. fibres, sheets, membranes, moulds with different backbone chemical configurations (LPE, LLDPE, LDPE, HDPE, UHMWPE, UHSPE etc). Each of these forms of PE requires surface modification at some stage of application. The surfaces of PE fibres are often modified to make them compatible in the composites, whereas PE sheets/tapes are modified to achieve adhesion. Moulds are frequently surface-modified for probability and membranes for selective permeation. In the same way, different chemical configurations of PE, by the virtue of their properties, are used for different applications after surface modification. 

The hydrophilicity-hydrophobicity balance of the membrane polymer is another important parameter that is mainly influenced by the functional groups of the polymer. Hydrophilic polymers have high affinity to water, and therefore they are suited as a material for nonporous membranes that should have a high permeability and selectivity for water (e.g., in RO or hydrophilic PV). In addition, hydrophilic membranes have been proven to be les s prone to fouling in aqueous systems than hydrophobic materials. 

Because most of the established membrane polymers can not meet all the performance requirements for a membrane dedicated to a particular application, membrane modifications are gaining rapidly increasing importance. Membrane modification is aimed either to minimize undesired interactions, which reduce membrane performance (e.g., membrane fouling), or to introduce additional interactions (e.g., affinity, responsive or catalytic properties) for improving the selectivity or creating an entirely novel separation function [3]. Three general approaches can be distinguished ... 

A wide variety of polymeric membranes with different barrier properties is already available, many of them in various formats and with various dedicated specifications. The ongoing development in the field is very dynamic and focused on further increasing barrier selectivities (if possible at maximum transmembrane fluxes) and/ or improving membrane stability in order to broaden the applicability. This tailoring of membrane performance is done via various routes controlled macro-molecular synthesis (with a focus on functional polymeric architectures), development of advanced polymer blends or mixed-matrix materials, preparation of novel composite membranes and selective surface modification are the most important trends. Advanced functional polymer membranes such as stimuli-responsive [54] or molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) membranes [55] are examples of the development of another dimension in that field. On that basis, it is expected that polymeric membranes will play a major role in process intensification in many different fields. 

Most polymers that have been of interest as membrane materials for gas or vapor separations are amorphous and have a single phase structure. Such polymers are converted into membranes that have a very thin dense layer or skin since pores or defects severely compromise selectivity. Permeation through this dense layer, which ideally is defect free, occurs by a solution-diffusion mechanism, which can lead to useful levels of selectivity. Each component in the gas or vapor feed dissolves in the membrane polymer at its upstream surface, much like gases dissolve in liquids, then diffuse through the polymer layer along a concentration gradient to the opposite surface where they evaporate into the downstream gas phase. In ideal cases, the sorption and diffusion process of one gas component does not alter that of another component, that is, the species permeate independently. 

---