Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Measurement errors Stochastic

CV varies as j JnA and it is not a small number for dosages involving few particles or drugs administered at very low doses otherwise, CV random fluctuations we expect from chance occurrences. However, if the number is very large, these fluctuations will be negligible, and for purposes of estimation, the stochastic error may be omitted in comparison with the measurement error. [Pg.243]

Stochastic errors with frequency much larger than />iy will appear as a stochastic error in the measurement whereas, stochastic errors with frequency much smaller than /n will appear as a bias error in the measurement. The significance of the bias error will depend on the comparison between the error frequency and the characteristic frequency of the entire measurement of the spectrum. [Pg.417]

For example, the output rate of a simple SISO reactor depends on various conditions. To model the transformation of input to output, knowledge about the chemical reaction and the chemical reactor can be used. E.g., a linear model might be used to describe this relationship properly on an aggregated level (e.g. the hourly production rate). Neglecting minor influences leads to a simplification of the process model. Additionally, measurement errors may hinder a perfect description of the process and lead to uncertainty in the observed process measures. This uncertainty is expressed e.g. by a (normal) error process. The resulting linear regression model can be verified using historical records of the process. Often historical records allow analysts to deduce a proper stochastic model of such a process. For more complex production processes more sophisticated stochastic models (as described in section 2.3) can be necessary. [Pg.145]

The quantities AUMC and AUSC can be regarded as the first and second statistical moments of the plasma concentration curve. These two moments have an equivalent in descriptive statistics, where they define the mean and variance, respectively, in the case of a stochastic distribution of frequencies (Section 3.2). From the above considerations it appears that the statistical moment method strongly depends on numerical integration of the plasma concentration curve Cp(r) and its product with t and (r-MRT). Multiplication by t and (r-MRT) tends to amplify the errors in the plasma concentration Cp(r) at larger values of t. As a consequence, the estimation of the statistical moments critically depends on the precision of the measurement process that is used in the determination of the plasma concentration values. This contrasts with compartmental analysis, where the parameters of the model are estimated by means of least squares regression. [Pg.498]

A single experiment consists of the measurement of each of the m response variables for a given set of values of the n independent variables. For each experiment, the measured output vector which can be viewed as a random variable is comprised of the deterministic part calculated by the model (Equation 2.1) and the stochastic part represented by the error term, i.e.,... [Pg.9]

All measurements are accompanied by a certain amount of error, and an estimate of its magnitude is necessary to validate results. The error cannot be eliminated completely, although its magnitude and nature can be characterized. It can also be reduced with improved techniques. In general, errors can be classified as random and systematic. If the same experiment is repeated several times, the individual measurements cluster around the mean value. The differences are due to unknown factors that are stochastic in nature and are termed random errors. They have a Gaussian distribution and equal probability of being above or below the mean. On the other hand, systematic errors tend to bias the measurements in one direction. Systematic error is measured as the deviation from the true value. [Pg.6]

Precision is the closeness of repeated estimates, observations, or measurements to each other. Accuracy is the combination of small systematic and stochastic errors... [Pg.29]

A particular type of within-array analysis is the so called self-self hybridization [9], in which two dyes are used to label the same RNA species, so that the fluorescence values acquired by the scanner for each gene is supposed to be the same for the two channels. This approach allows the identification of the variability which depends only on systematic biases or on stochastic processes. Some authors suggest the performance of some self-self hybridization for each experiment, to establish an error model used to correct data derived from experimental measurements. [Pg.553]

An estimator (or more specifically an optimal state estimator ) in this usage is an algorithm for obtaining approximate values of process variables which cannot be directly measured. It does this by using knowledge of the system and measurement dynamics, assumed statistics of measurement noise, and initial condition information to deduce a minimum error state estimate. The basic algorithm is usually some version of the Kalman filter.14 In extremely simple terms, a stochastic process model is compared to known process measurements, the difference is minimized in a least-squares sense, and then the model values are used for unmeasurable quantities. Estimators have been tested on a variety of processes, including mycelial fermentation and fed-batch penicillin production,13 and baker s yeast fermentation.15 The... [Pg.661]

In this section we analyze experimental data and make comparisons with theory. Data were obtained for 100 CdSe-ZnS nanocrystals at room temperature.1 We first performed data analysis (similar to standard approach) based on the distribution of on and off times and found that a+= 0.735 0.167 and v = 0.770 0.106,2 for the total duration time T = T = 3600 s (bin size 10 ms, threshold was taken as 0.16 max I(t) for each trajectory). Within error of measurement, a+ a k 0.75. The value of a 0.75 implies that the simple diffusion model with a = 0.5 is not valid in this case. An important issue is whether the exponents vary from one NC to another. In Fig. 13 (top) we show the distribution of a obtained from data analysis of power spectra. The power spectmm method [26] yields a single exponent apSd for each stochastic trajectory (which is in our case a+ a apSd). Figure 13 illustrates that the spread of a in the interval 0 < a < 1 is not large. Numerical simulation of 100 trajectories switching between 1 and 0, with /+ (x) = / (x) and a = 0.8, and with the same number of bins as the experimental trajectories, was performed and the... [Pg.350]

An uncertainty analysis involves the determination of the variation of imprecision in an output function based on the collective variance of model inputs. One of the five issues in uncertainty analysis that must be confronted is how to distinguish between the relative contribution of variability (i.e. heterogeneity) versus true certainty (measurement precision) to the characterization of predicted outcome. Variability refers to quantities that are distributed empirically - such factors as soil characteristics, weather patterns and human characteristics - which come about through processes that we expect to be stochastic because they reflect actual variations in nature. These processes are inherently random or variable, and cannot be represented by a single value, so that we can determine only their moments (mean, variance, skewness, etc.) with precision. In contrast, true uncertainty or model specification error (e.g. statistical estimation error) refers to an input that, in theory, has a single value, which cannot be known with precision due to measurement or estimation error. [Pg.140]

The experimental design parameters described in this section are influenced by the system under investigation, the objective of the investigation, and the capabilities of the instrumentation. The objective is to maximize the information content of the measurement while minimizing bias and stochastic errors. [Pg.133]

Remember 8.3 Impedance measurements entail a compromise balance behveen minimizing bias errors, minimizing stochastic errors, and maximizing the information content of the resulting spectrum. The optimal instrument settings and experimental parameters are not universal and must be selected for each system under study. [Pg.133]


See other pages where Measurement errors Stochastic is mentioned: [Pg.72]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.4556]    [Pg.116]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.192 ]




SEARCH



Error measure

Error measurement

© 2024 chempedia.info