Mass boundary layer thickness

The comparison of the magnitude of the two resistances clearly indicates whether tire metal or the slag mass transfer is rate-determining. A value for the ratio of the boundary layer thicknesses can be obtained from the Sherwood number, which is related to the Reynolds number and the Schmidt number, defined by... 

When the two liquid phases are in relative motion, the mass transfer coefficients in eidrer phase must be related to die dynamical properties of the liquids. The boundary layer thicknesses are related to the Reynolds number, and the diffusive Uansfer to the Schmidt number. Another complication is that such a boundaty cannot in many circumstances be regarded as a simple planar interface, but eddies of material are U ansported to the interface from the bulk of each liquid which change the concenuation profile normal to the interface. In the simple isothermal model there is no need to take account of this fact, but in most indusuial chcumstances the two liquids are not in an isothermal system, but in one in which there is a temperature gradient. The simple stationary mass U ansfer model must therefore be replaced by an eddy mass U ansfer which takes account of this surface replenishment. 

Thus the driving force for fuming is approximately equal to that for free evaporation. Using dre experimental data, and the normal expression for mass transfer across a boundary layer, it is concluded that the boundary layer thickness which would account for this rate should be about 2 x 10 cm (Turkdogan et al., 1963). 

This can be further integrated from the wall to the boundary layer thickness y = 8, where the component is at the bulk concentration Cj,. Substituting / = - o and k = D/o, the mass-transfer coefficient yields the stagnant film model [Brian, Desalination by Reverse Osmosis, Merten (ed.), M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1966, pp. 161-292] ... 

The application of RHSE is primarily in the laminar boundary layer flow regime of Re < 15000, where the edge effect is negligible and the mass transfer theory has been confirmed by experimental investigations. An important consideration in the design of a practical RHSE system is to conform to the theoretical requirement that the boundary layer thickness be thin in comparison to the radius of the RHSE (<5 a). 

Early investigators assumed that this so-called diffusion layer was stagnant (Nernst-Whitman model), and that the concentration profile of the reacting ion was linear, with the film thickness <5N chosen to give the actual concentration gradient at the electrode. In reality, however, the thin diffusion layer is not stagnant, and the fictitious t5N is always smaller than the real mass-transfer boundary-layer thickness (Fig. 2). However, since the actual concentration profile tapers off gradually to the bulk value of the concentration, the well-defined Nernst diffusion layer thickness has retained a certain convenience in practical calculations. 

Unsuitable position of the reference electrode resulting in inclusion of a high ohmic potential drop between reference and working electrode. Moreover, when extended surfaces are used over which the mass transfer boundary layer thickness depends on position, a suitable number of independent reference electrodes should be used to measure local overpotentials on electrically isolated segments of the working electrode. 

Apart from the nature of the bulk flow, the hydrodynamic scenario close to the surfaces of drug particles has to be considered. The nature of the hydrodynamic boundary layer generated at a particle s surface may be laminar or turbulent regardless of the bulk flow characteristics. The turbulent boundary layer is considered to be thicker than the laminar layer. Nevertheless, mass transfer rates are usually increased with turbulence due to the presence of the viscous turbulent sub-layer. This is the part of the (total) turbulent boundary layer that constitutes the main resistance to the overall mass transfer in the case of turbulence. The development of a viscous turbulent sub-layer reduces the overall resistance to mass transfer since this viscous sub-layer is much narrower than the (total) laminar boundary layer. Thus, mass transfer from turbulent boundary layers is greater than would be calculated according to the total boundary layer thickness. 

The mass transfer boundary layer thickness, d, on a rotating disk electrode can be estimated by d = 1.6/J V a) where D is the substrate diffusion coefficient, v is the solution viscosity, and CO is the disk rotation speed. 

Higher tangential veloceties (or recirculation rates) should decrease the boundary layer thickness (6) and increase the mass transfer coefficient (k) in Equation 3 resulting in higher slopes of the flux vs concentration curve (Figure 11) without changing the gel-concentration. 

One example would be ice melting or methane hydrate dissociation when rising in seawater. Convective melting rate may be obtained by analogy to convective dissolution rate. Heat diffusivity k would play the role of mass diffusivity. The thermal Peclet number (defined as Pet = 2aw/K) would play the role of the compositional Peclet number. The Nusselt number (defined as Nu = 2u/5t, where 8t is the thermal boundary layer thickness) would play the role of Sherwood number. The thermal boundary layer (thickness 8t) would play the role of compositional boundary layer. The melting equation may be written as... 

For convective crystal dissolution, the dissolution rate is u = (p/p )bD/8. For diffusive crystal dissolution, the dissolution rate is u = diffusive boundary layer thickness as 5 = (Df), the diffusive crystal dissolution rate can be written as u = aD/5, where a is positively related to b through Equation 4-100. Therefore, mass-transfer-controlled crystal dissolution rates (and crystal growth rates, discussed below) are controlled by three parameters the diffusion coefficient D, the boundary layer thickness 5, and the compositional parameter b. The variation and magnitude of these parameters are summarized below. 

The mass transfer rates for the case when d > d can easily be obtained from Eqs. 9 or 12 (see [48]). Using the surface renewal theory this case is not relevant because the boundary layer thickness is here considered to be infinite. 

The concentration polarization occurring in electrodialysis, that is, the concentration profiles at the membrane surface can be calculated by a mass balance taking into account all fluxes in the boundary layer and the hydrodynamic conditions in the flow channel between the membranes. To a first approximation the salt concentration at the membrane surface can be calculated and related to the current density by applying the so-called Nernst film model, which assumes that the bulk solution between the laminar boundary layers has a uniform concentration, whereas the concentration in the boundary layers changes over the thickness of the boundary layer. However, the concentration at the membrane surface and the boundary layer thickness are constant along the flow channel from the cell entrance to the exit. In a practical electrodialysis stack there will be entrance and exit effects and concentration... 

When deposition is controlled by diffusion. Equation (28) shows that variations in boundary layer thickness, 5, influence the mass flux due to diffusion and thereby, the deposition rate. In practical CVD reactors, boundary layer thicknesses can vary so that thickness uniformity of deposition can be poor unless this phenomena is recognized and corrected. 

Implicit in this model is the assumption that molecular diffusivity and Henry s Law constant are directly and inversely proportional, respectively, to the gas flux across the atmosphere-water interface. Molecular diffusion coefficients typically range from 1 x 10-5 to 4 x 10-5 cm2 s-1 and typically increase with temperature and decreasing molecular weight (table 5.3). Other factors such as thickness of the thin layer and wind also have important effects on gas flux. For example, wind creates shear that results in a decrease in the thickness of the thin layer. The sea surface microlayer has been shown to consist of films 50-100 pm in thickness (Libes, 1992). Other work has referred to this layer as the mass boundary layer (MBL) where a similar range of film thicknesses has been... 

The two mass transfer coefficients kG and kL give the ratio of the respective diffusion coefficients, D to the respective boundary layer thickness, xp... 

---