Boundary layer hydrodynamic

In many respects, similar to the diffusion layer concept, there is that of the hydrodynamic boundary layer, 5H. The concept was due originally to Prandtl [16] and is defined as the region within which all velocity gradients occur. In practice, there has to be a compromise since all flow functions tend to asymptotic limits at infinite distance this is, to some extent, subjective. Thus for the rotating disc electrode, Levich [3] defines 5H as the distance where the radial and tangential velocity components are within 5% of their bulk values, whereas Riddiford [7] takes a figure of 10% (see below). It has been shown that 

the assumption of no convection within the diffusion layer is not unreasonable for normal values of D and v. 

---

If the thickness of the diffusion boundary layer is smaller than b — a (and also smaller than a), one may consider that the diffusion takes place from the sphere to an infinite liquid. It should be emphasized here that the thickness of the diffusion boundary layer is usually about 10 % of the thickness of the hydrodynamic boundary layer (L3). Hence this condition imposes no contradiction to the requirements of the free surface model and Eq. (195). ... 

Initially it was assumed that no solution movement occurs within the diffusion layer. Actually, a velocity gradient exists in a layer, termed the hydrodynamic boundary layer (or the Prandtl layer), where the fluid velocity increases from zero at the interface to the constant bulk value (U). The thickness of the hydrodynamic layer, dH, is related to that of the diffusion layer ... 

Heterogeneous rate constants, 12, 113 Hofmeister sequence, 153 Hybridization, 183, 185 Hydrodynamic boundary layer, 10 Hydrodynamic modulation, 113 Hydrodynamic voltammetry, 90 Hydrodynamic voltammogram, 88 Hydrogen evolution, 117 Hydrogen overvoltage, 110, 117 Hydrogen peroxide, 123, 176... 

Open-channel monoliths are better defined. The Sherwood (and Nusselt) number varies mainly in the axial direction due to the formation ofa hydrodynamic boundary layer and a concentration (temperature) boundary layer. Owing to the chemical reactions and heat formation on the surface, the local Sherwood (and Nusselt) numbers depend on the local reaction rate and the reaction rate upstream. A complicating factor is that the traditional Sherwood numbers are usually defined for constant concentration or constant flux on the surface, while, in reahty, the catalytic reaction on the surface exhibits different behavior. 

A similar situation occurs in the case of free convection and exothermic chemical reaction phenomena where the hydrodynamic boundary layer is separated from the reaction front. 

In the flow, the thin layer of liquid that is directly adjacent to the solid is retained by molecular forces and does not move. The liquid s velocity relative to the sohd increases from zero at the very surface to the bulk value v which is attained some distance away from the surface. The zone within which the velocity changes is called the Prandtl or hydrodynamic boundary layer. 

In contrast to the RDE, the range of rotation speeds used in the RDC is rather limited. The upper limit is around 6-8 Hz, while Eq. (8) breaks down below approximately 1-2 Hz, where the hydrodynamic boundary layer. 

For flow parallel to an electrode, a maximum in the value of the mass-transfer rate occurs at the leading edge of the electrode. This is not only the case in flow over a flat plate, but also in pipes, annuli, and channels. In all these cases, the parallel velocity component in the mass-transfer boundary layer is practically a linear function of the distance to the electrode. Even though the parallel velocity profile over the hydrodynamic boundary layer (of thickness h) or over the duct diameter (with equivalent diameter de) is parabolic or more complicated, a linear profile within the diffusion layer (of thickness 8d) may be assumed. This is justified by the extreme thinness of the diffusion layer in liquids of high Schmidt number ... 

In free-convection mass transfer at electrodes, as well as in forced convection, the concentration (diffusion) boundary layer (5d extends only over a very small part of the hydrodynamic boundary layer <5h. In laminar free convection, the ratio of the thicknesses is... 

The hydrodynamic boundary layer has an inner part where the vertical velocity increases to a maximum determined by a balance of viscous and buoyancy forces. In fluids of high Schmidt number, the concentration diffusion layer thickness is of the same order of magnitude as this inner part of the hydrodynamic boundary layer. In the outer part of the hydrodynamic boundary layer, where the vertical velocity decays, the buoyancy force is unimportant. The profile of the vertical velocity component near the electrode can be shown to be parabolic. 

The velocity of liquid flow around suspended solid particles is reduced by frictional resistance and results in a region characterized by a velocity gradient between the surface of the solid particle and the bulk fluid. This region is termed the hydrodynamic boundary layer and the stagnant layer within it that is diffusion-controlled is often known as the effective diffusion boundary layer. The thickness of this stagnant layer has been suggested to be about 10 times smaller than the thickness of the hydrodynamic boundary layer [13]. 

Mooney et al. [70] investigated the effect of pH on the solubility and dissolution of ionizable drugs based on a film model with total component material balances for reactive species, proposed by Olander. McNamara and Amidon [71] developed a convective diffusion model that included the effects of ionization at the solid-liquid surface and irreversible reaction of the dissolved species in the hydrodynamic boundary layer. Jinno et al. [72], and Kasim et al. [73] investigated the combined effects of pH and surfactants on the dissolution of the ionizable, poorly water-soluble BCS Class II weak acid NSAIDs piroxicam and ketoprofen, respectively. 

An important concept in fluid mechanics is the hydrodynamic boundary layer (also known as Prandtl layer) or region where the effective disturbance... 

Figure 5. Exact (numerical solution, continuous line) and linearised (equation (24), dotted line) velocity profile (i.e. vy of the fluid at different distances x from the surface) at y = 10-5 m in the case of laminar flow parallel to an active plane (Section 4.1). Parameters Dt = 10 9m2 s-1, v = 10-3ms-1, and v = 10-6m2s-1. The hydrodynamic boundary layer thickness (<50 = 5 x 10 4 m), equation (26), where 99% of v is reached is shown with a horizontal double arrow line. For comparison, the normalised concentration profile of species i, ct/ithe linear profile of the diffusion layer approach (continuous line) and its thickness (<5, = 3 x 10 5m, equation (34)) have been added. Notice that the linearisation of the exact velocity profile requires that <5,

Figure 8. Variation of the hydrodynamic boundary layer thickness (So, equation (26), continuous line), the diffusion layer thickness (<5,-, equation (34), dotted line) and the ensuing local flux (/, equation (32), dashed line) with respect to the distance from the leading edge (y) in the case of laminar flow parallel to an active plane (the surface is a sink for species i). Parameters /), = 10-9nrs, v= 10 3ms, c = lmolm-3, and v — 10-6 m2 s 1. Notice that c5, o (as required for the derivation of the flux equation (32)), and that the flux decreases when <5, increases...

Ary given catalytic material can be abstracted based on the same underlying similar architecture — for ease of comparison, we describe the catalytic material as a porous network with the active centers responsible for the conversion of educts to products distributed on the internal surface of the pores and the external surface area. Generally, the conversion of any given educt by the aid of the catalytic material is divided into a number of consecutive steps. Figure 11.13 illustrates these different steps. The governing transport phenomenon outside the catalyst responsible for mass transport is the convective fluid flow. This changes dramatically close to the catalyst surface from a certain boundary onwards, named the hydrodynamic boundary layer, mass transport toward and from the catalyst surface only takes place... 

Diffusion of reactants through hydrodynamic boundary layer... 

Regime of transport limitation, here

diffusion through the hydrodynamic boundary layer. The apparent activation energy under these conditions gets close to zero. Every educt molecule reacts instantaneously on the outer catalyst surface, no educt diffusion inside the catalyst particle takes place. 

Figure 4 Hydrodynamic boundary layer development on the semi-infinite plate of Prandtl. <5D = laminar boundary layer, <5t = turbulent boundary layer, /vs = viscous turbulent sub-layer, <5ds = diffusive sub-layer (no eddies are present solute diffusion and mass transfer are controlled by molecular diffusion—the thickness is about 1/10 of <5vs)> B = point of laminar—turbulent transition. Source From Ref. 10.

Apart from the nature of the bulk flow, the hydrodynamic scenario close to the surfaces of drug particles has to be considered. The nature of the hydrodynamic boundary layer generated at a particle s surface may be laminar or turbulent regardless of the bulk flow characteristics. The turbulent boundary layer is considered to be thicker than the laminar layer. Nevertheless, mass transfer rates are usually increased with turbulence due to the presence of the viscous turbulent sub-layer. This is the part of the (total) turbulent boundary layer that constitutes the main resistance to the overall mass transfer in the case of turbulence. The development of a viscous turbulent sub-layer reduces the overall resistance to mass transfer since this viscous sub-layer is much narrower than the (total) laminar boundary layer. Thus, mass transfer from turbulent boundary layers is greater than would be calculated according to the total boundary layer thickness. 

Originally, the concept of the Prandtl boundary layer was developed for hydraulically even bodies. It is assumed that any characteristic length L on the particle surface is much greater than the thickness (<5hl) of the boundary layer itself (L > Ojil) Provided this assumption is fulfilled, the concept can be adapted to curved bodies and spheres, including real drug particles. Furthermore, the classical ( macroscopic ) concept of the hydrodynamic boundary layer is valid solely for high Reynolds numbers of Re>104 (14,15). This constraint was overcome for the microscopic hydrodynamics of dissolving particles by the convective diffusion theory (9). 

The convective diffusion theory was developed by V.G. Levich to solve specific problems in electrochemistry encountered with the rotating disc electrode. Later, he applied the classical concept of the boundary layer to a variety of practical tasks and challenges, such as particle-liquid hydrodynamics and liquid-gas interfacial problems. The conceptual transfer of the hydrodynamic boundary layer is applicable to the hydrodynamics of dissolving particles if the Peclet number (Pe) is greater than unity (Pe > 1) (9). The dimensionless Peclet number describes the relationship between convection and diffusion-driven mass transfer ... 

The Schmidt number is the ratio of kinematic viscosity to molecular diffusivity. Considering liquids in general and dissolution media in particular, the values for the kinematic viscosity usually exceed those for diffusion coefficients by a factor of 103 to 104. Thus, Prandtl or Schmidt numbers of about 103 are usually obtained. Subsequently, and in contrast to the classical concept of the boundary layer, Re numbers of magnitude of about Re > 0.01 are sufficient to generate Peclet numbers greater than 1 and to justify the hydrodynamic boundary layer concept for particle-liquid dissolution systems (Re Pr = Pe). It can be shown that [(9), term 10.15, nomenclature adapted]... 

Note that the hydrodynamic boundary layer depends on the diffusion coefficient. Introducing the proportionality constant K° results in an equation valid for any desired hydrodynamic system based on relative fluid motion as proposed in Ref. 10 ... 

K° consists of a combination of Prandtl s original proportionality constant used for the hydrodynamic boundary layer at a semi-infinitive plate, Ke, and a constant, K, characterizing a particular hydrodynamic system that is under consideration. The latter constant has to be determined experimentally. 

A reciprocal proportionality exists between the square root of the characteristic flow rate, t/A, and the thickness of the effective hydrodynamic boundary layer, <5Hl- Moreover, f)HL depends on the diffusion coefficient D, characteristic length L, and kinematic viscosity v of the fluid. Based on Levich s convective diffusion theory the combination model ( Kombi-nations-Modell ) was derived to describe the dissolution of particles and solid formulations exposed to agitated systems [(10), Chapter 5.2]. In contrast to the rotating disc method, the combination model is intended to serve as an approximation describing the dissolution in hydrodynamic systems where the solid solvendum is not necessarily fixed but is likely to move within the dissolution medium. Introducing the term... 

Further Factors Affecting the Hydrodynamic Boundary Layer... 

---