Management/managers hazard analysis

Safety management hazard analysis risk reduction achievement... 

The EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) has responsibility for managing the analysis programs required under the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The approved analytical methods are designed to analyze water, soil, and sediment from potentially hazardous waste sites to determine the presence or absence of certain environmentally harmful organic compounds. The methods described here all require the use of GC/MS. 

Hazard analysis does have limitations. First, there can never be a guarantee that the method has identified all of the hazards, accident scenarios, and consequences. Second, the method is very sensitive to the assumptions made by the analysts prior to beginning the procedure. A different set of analysts might well lead to a different result. Third, the procedure is sensitive to the experience of the participants. Finally, the results are sometimes difficult to interpret and manage. 

Many companies use worker—management teams, suggestion boxes, consultant surveys, suppHer training sessions, and other methods to reduce risk of injuries (see Hazard analysis and risk assessment). The principal regulatory burden falls on wastes and discharges which leave the plant (3,53,54). 

Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) (Dowell, 1994, pp. 30-34.) The OSHA rule for Process Safety Management (PSM) of Highly Toxic Hazardous Chemicals, 29 CFR 1910.119, part (e), reqmres an initial PHA and an update every five years for processes that handle listed chemicals or contain over 10,000 lb (4356 kg) of flammable material. The PHA must be done by a team, must include employees such as operators and mechanics, and must have at least one person skilled in the methodology employed. Suggested methodologies from Process Safety Management are listed in Table 26-1. 

TABLE 26-1 Process Hazard Analysis Methods Listed in the OSHA Process Safety Management Rule... 

Perform process hazards analysis Perform management of change review... 

A PHA has heen performed for new facilities. The management of change documentation packages and referenced documents should indicate when a process hazard analysis was performed for the modification or new facility. The PSSR Team should verify all of the PHA recommendations have been implemented or otherwise resolved before the toll process can be judged ready to operate. 

The effort and time that is required for a process hazard analysis for these examples should not be an issue. A thorough management of change system will call for the change coordinator to make a decision as to what type of review is appropriate for the change. 

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), U. S. Department of Transportation (DOT), and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (ca. 1989). Handbook of Chemical Hazard Analysis Procedures. Washington, D. C. FEMA Publications Office. 

Included in OSH As JHA Booklet, 3071, is a good description of a process hazard analysis (PHA) [1]. This is being used in the Process Safety Management (PSM) program (29 CER 1910.119) to understand how hazards exist. There are some good methods listed in the manual that can be used to conduct a JHA. As you review each method you can determine which one may be useful for your operation. The typical method chosen is the checklist. 

PSM was created to help the management of hazards associated with processes using highly hazardous chemicals. In an appendix to the rule, OSHA discussed several methods of process hazard analysis. That... 

On July 17, 1990, OSHA issued a proposed rule for the management of hazards assoeiated with proeesses using highly hazardous ehemieals. This rule, ealled the Proeess Safety Management Standard, was finalized on February 24, 1992. In an appendix to the proposed rule, OSHA diseussed several methods of proeess hazard analysis. That diseussion may be helpful for those doing job hazard analyses. Refer to Chapter 4 for these methods. 

To develop a safe design, it is necessary to first design and specify all equipment and systems in accordance with applicable codes and standards. Once the system is designed, a process safety shutdown system is specified to assure that potential hazards that can be detected by measuring process upsets are detected, and that appropriate safety actions (normally an automatic shutdown) are initiated. A hazards analysis is then normally undertaken to identify and mitigate potential hazards that could lead to fire, explosion, pollution, or injury to personnel and that cannot be detected as process upsets. Finally, a system of safety management is implemented to assure the system is operated and maintained in a safe manner by personnel who have received adequate training. 

Process Safety Information Process Hazard Analysis Management of Change Operating Procedures Safe Work Practices Training... 

Prevention Program —Management System —Process Hazards Analysis —Process Safety Information —Standard Operating Procedures —Training... 

Rocky Butte plant PSM team Adapt Rocky Butte process hazard analysis system for use at all sites F. Kirby, Plant Safety Manager... 

As discussed in Chapter 2, most of the basic resources you will need are fairiy self-evident time of staff will almost certainly be the latgest single cost. Support expenses and travel also require funding. In addition, in the course of yourwork to date you may have identified specific resource requirements, such as computer software for hazard analysis or project management, or consulting services that fill in specific gaps in the knowledge base. 

Assume that the system described below exists in a process unit recently purchased by your company. As the manager, the safety of this unit is now your responsibility. You are concerned because your process hazard analysis team identified the potential for an operator error to result in a rupture of the propane condenser. You have commissioned a human reliability analysis (HRA) to estimate the likelihood of the condenser rupturing as the result of such an error and to identify ways to reduce the expected frequency of such ruptures... 

H.R. Kavianian, R. Orr, R. Arbuckle, and A. Edwards, "Hazard Analysis and Safety Management of a Radioactive Gas Handlin Process, School of Engineering, California State Uni ersity, Long Beach, CA, 1988. 

To improve the ability to establish best practice with respect to manure use and prevention of pathogen transfer (especially on farms which are converting to organic farm management), a hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP)-based quality assurance system has been proposed (Haward and Leifert, 1999). This proposed four main critical control points (CCPs) (see Table 19.4). 

One of the most important elements of the PSM Rule is the process hazard analysis (PrHA). It requires the systematic identification of hazards and related accident scenarios. The PSM Rule allows the use of different analysis methods, but the selected method must be based on the process being analyzed. The PSM Rule specifies that PrHAs must be completed as soon as possible within a 5-year period. However, one-fourth of the PrHAs must have been completed by May 26, 1994, with an additional one-fourth completed each succeeding year. The highest risk processes were to be done first. A schedule for PrHAs must be established at the outset of a process safety management (PSM) program to give priority to the highest risk processes. PrHAs must be reviewed and updated at least every 5 years. 

Emergency Management Agency, Handbook of Chemical Hazard Analysis Procedures, p. 6-7, 1989). It is likely that the absorption process functions in proportion to the square root of the duration of exposure (Perry, Chemical Engineers Handbook, 4th ed., p. 14-13 and Figs. 14-7, 14-9, and 14-21, 1963). 

---