Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Lowest analytically quantifiable

The repeatability and stability studies were done at concentration levels which preliminary evidence on liquid samples had shown to be reproducible within 10% CV. However, this was not the case for three of the dyes (C.I. Direct Red 28, C.I. Direct Brown 95, and C.I. Direct Black 38). In this situation, the lowest analytically quantifiable limit (LAQL) had to be redefined. From the results of the repeatability study, the second highest level was the logical choice for this redefined LAQL. A second abbreviated stability study was conducted with C.I. Direct Red 28, C.I. Direct Black 38, and... [Pg.31]

This expresses the lowest analyte concentration (or mass) that can be detected but not necessarily quantified [168]. The detection limit corresponds then to the lowest analyte concentration that provides a response different to that related to the blank value. One has to be careful about which formula is used hence, different formulae with specific features [167,169] should be critically discussed. As a rule, the detection limit can be estimated as three times the blank signal. Consequently, a better detection limit is achieved with a lower signal-to-noise ratio. [Pg.192]

LOD LOD = lowest analyte concentration that can be detected but not quantified under the stated experimental conditions LOD = lowest concentration that can be distinguished from the background noise with a certain degree of confidence. LOD = (F X C X X X orLOD = F X sb or LOD = F X [9]... [Pg.2022]

The limit of detection (LOD) or detection limit of a method is the lowest analyte concentration that the detector wiU produce a response detectable above the background, or noise level, of the system. The minimum detectable level (MDL) is the concentration level at the LOD and generally defined as three times the noise level (baseline) of the detector. LOD and MDL are the two quantifiable values that can measure the sensitivity of the method. Sensitivity is the smallest difference in the response of the detector (signal) that can be detected for the method. LOD is the smallest amount that is clearly distinguishable from the background or blank. [Pg.980]

Finally, it is important to define the lowest level of method validation (LLMV). The LLMV is defined as the lowest concentration level expressed in terms of amount of analyte in the matrix, at which the method (extraction/analysis procedure) was validated or proven to be capable of reliably quantifying. [Pg.64]

The MDL and practical quantitation limit (PQL) should be appropriate for the objectives of the analysis. MDL refers to the minimum concentration of the compound of interest that can be measured and reported with a specified confidence (99% probability) that the concentration is above zero. The registrants must provide or develop an analytical method for water for the parent pesticide and its degradates that has an MDL of 0.01% of the label application rate (calculated as the average concentration in the top six inches of soil), or 0.05 pgL , whichever is lower. PQL refers to the lowest concentration at which the laboratory can confidently quantify the concentration of the compound of interest. The study authors must report all samples with concentrations above the MDL as detections, including those below the PQL in which the concentration cannot be quantified. In addition, the study authors must provide sample equations to demonstrate how the PQL was calculated. [Pg.612]

As the name implies the LoD describes the lowest concentration that can be detected with a certain level of confidence. From here we can state that the analyte is really present. This does not mean that we can quantify the content of the analyte with a certain confidence. This is only possible at concentrations above the LoQ. [Pg.193]

Where measnrements are made at low concentration levels, e.g. in trace analysis, it is important to know what is the lowest concentration of the analyte that can be confidently detected by the method. Forvahdation purposes it is normally sufficient to provide an indication of the level at which detection becomes problematic. Limit of detection is the lowest concentration of analyte in a sample that can be detected, but not necessarily quantified under the stated conditions of the test. [Pg.227]

The decision limit CCa is the limit at and above which it can be concluded with an error probability of a that a sample is noncompliant. If a permitted limit (PL) has been established for a substance (group or the regulated compounds), the result of a sample is noncompliant if the decision limit is exceeded (CCa = xPL + 1. 64vMri.). If no permitted limit has been established (group A), the decision limit is the lowest concentration level at which the method can discriminate with a statistical certainty of 1-a that the particular analyte is present (CCa = + 2.33.vs impic). The detection capability CCp is the smallest content of the substance that may be detected, identified, and/or quantified in a sample with an error probability of p (CCp = CCa + 1.65xsampie). [Pg.775]

Detection limit is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample which can be detected but not necessarily quantified as an exact value. [Pg.826]

Lowest amount of the analyte in the sample which can be detected but not necessarily quantified as an exact value. LOD is expressed as a concentration or a quantity derived from the smallest signal xLi which can be detected with a reasonable certainty for an analytical procedure. The LOD can be determined using the equation xL = xbl +ksbl with xbl and sbl as the mean value and the standard deviation of blank, respectively. LOD of an element or element species is often used as 3sbl (3cr) of blank.3... [Pg.474]

The limit of quantification, LOQ, is a figure of merit that expresses the ability of a measurement process to quantify adequately an analyte and it is defined as the lowest amount or concentration of analyte that can be determined with an acceptable level of precision and accuracy [73]. In practice, the... [Pg.231]

Typically, laboratories choose the analyte PQL value at 2-10 times its MDL. The selection, however, is not entirely arbitrary because the laboratories must use the selected PQL concentration value as the lowest standard in the multipoint calibration curve. This enables the laboratory to assure that even at a low concentration level, the analyte is detected, identified, and quantified correctly. Therefore, the PQL may be also defined as a concentration that is 2-10 times greater than the MDL and that represents the lowest point on the calibration curve during routine laboratory operations. [Pg.241]

LOD was defined as the lowest concentration for which the two monitored transitions could be detected, and the peak area of the quantifier transition was, at least, three times the background noise. LOD was 0.5 ng/mL for all analytes. LLOQ was defined as the lowest concentration that could be quantified with appropriate imprecision (coefficient of variation (%CV) <20%) and inaccuracy (mean relative error (MRE) 20%). LLOQ was 2 ng/mL in oral fluid, and 2-4 ng/mL in plasma for most of the analytes. Carryover after automated SPE of clomipramine at 1,000 ng/ mL was half of the signal obtained at 2 ng/mL therefore, LLOQ in plasma was increased to 10 ng/mL for this analyte. [Pg.166]

Another way that has been used to describe the limit of detection of an analytical method is, the detection limit of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest amount of an analyte in a sample which can be detected but not necessarily quantified as an exact value . [Pg.34]

Quantitative Analysis. To study those factors that influence the occurrence of methoxypyrazines, it was necessary to be able to quantify them. Furthermore, it was desirable that this be possible even at the lowest levels that might be relevant. This indicated a need for their quantitative analysis to extend to concentrations below their sensory detection threshold of 1-2 ng/L, preferably by an order of magnitude. Accurate quantitative analysis at such extremely low analyte concentrations is difficult to achieve. If a moderate sample size is to be used, and if the analysis is to cope with some losses in isolation, then the technique needs to have a detection limit of a few picograms. Furthermore, it must provide quantitative data with adequate accuracy and precision for meaningful interpretation. [Pg.32]

Sensitivity is the ability of a method to reliably respond in a consistently recognizable manner to decreasingly smaller amounts of analyte. Frequently utihzed measures of sensitivity are the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ). For chromatographic procedures, LOD is the lowest concentration of analyte that can be detected above the baseline detector noise at the most sensitive instrument setting, but not necessarily quantified. In chromatographic practice, the detection limit is the injected amount that results in a peak with a height twice or three times as high as the baseline noise. [Pg.1700]

A clear distinction should be made between the limit of detection, LOD, and the lower limit of quantification, LLOQ. The LOD is defined as the concentration of analyte that results in a peak height three times the noise when injected into the chromatographic system, i.e., the point at which a measured value is greater than the uncertainty associated with it. LOD is the lowest concentration of the analyte in a sample that can be detected but not necessarily quantified. The LLOQ is the lowest concentration of the analyte in a sample that can be quantified with acceptable accuracy and precision. The LLOQ should have an accuracy of 80-120 % and a precision of maximum 20 % [16], Both the LLOQ and LOD were investigated in paper II. [Pg.36]

Quantification below LLOQ is by definition not acceptable [2, 5, 9, 10, 13, 14]. Therefore, below this value a method can only produce semiquantitative or qualitative data. However, it can still be important to know the LOD of the method. According to ICH, it is the lowest concentration of analyte in a sample which can be detected but not necessarily quantified as an exact value. According to Conference Report II, it is the lowest concentration of an analyte in a sample, that the bioanalytical procedure can reliably differentiate from background noise [10, 13]. [Pg.6]

Limit of Detection. Limit of detection is defined as the lowest amount of analyte that can be detected but not necessarily quantified in the sample. It is generally accepted by most international measurements standards that limit of detection is based on three times the standard deviation of the baseline noise, i.e. [Pg.98]

Limit of detection is the lowest concentration of analyte in the sample that can be detected, but not necessarily quantified under the stated conditions of the test (Eurachem Guide, 1998). [Pg.388]


See other pages where Lowest analytically quantifiable is mentioned: [Pg.50]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.736]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.773]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.662]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.4456]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.1560]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.145]   


SEARCH



Lowest analytically quantifiable determination

Lowest analytically quantifiable level

© 2024 chempedia.info