0-Cyclodextrin cavity

The transition state of concerted Diels-Alder reactions has stringent regio- and stereochemical requirements and can assume settled configurations if the reaction is carried out in a molecular cavity. Cyclodextrins, porphyrin derivatives and cyclophanes are the supramolecular systems that have been most investigated. 

Cyclodextrins (Table 12.2) are cyclic molecules made up of glucose monomers coupled to form a rigid, hollow, tapering torus with a hydro-phobic interior cavity (Figure 12.2). Because of the presence of the cavity, cyclodextrins are able to act as hosts, binding with small guest molecules held within the internal cavity. 

I Cyclodextrins are excellent enzyme models Catalysis and induced fit. Due to their cavities, which are able to accommodate guest (substrate) molecules, and due to the many hydroxyl groups lining this cavity, cyclodextrins can act catalytically in a variety of chemical reactions and they therefore serve as good model enzymes. Thus, benzoic acid esters are hydrolyzed in I aqueous solution by factors up to 100 times faster if cyclodextrins are added. The reaction in- j volves an acylated cyclodextrin as intermediate which is hydrolyzed in a second step of the j reaction, a mechanism reminiscent of the enzyme chymotrypsin. The catalytic efficiency can. be further enhanced if the cyclodextrins are suitably modified chemically so that a whole range of artificial enzymes have been synthesized [551-555, 556, 563, 564]. 

Cyclodextrin complexation also depends on a suitable molecular topology that allows the guest molecule to ht within the hydrophobic host cavity. Cyclodextrins form inclusion compounds with hydrophobic guest molecules in... 

Amino acids may be bound in water by molecules with hydrophobic cavities. Cyclodextrin derivatives were studied extensively. Enantioselectivities are usually modest, with some exceptions. For example, a diphenoxyphos-phoryl-substituted p-cyclodextrin bound serine with 3.6 1 enantioselectivity " and an a-cyclodextrin with a pyr-idinium substituent showed 10 1 enantioselectivity toward the same substrate.Synthetic cyclophanes were also used. The bipyridinium-based macrocycle 36 bound DOPA 37 with 13 R S selectivity in acidic aqueous solution. 

Because of their polar hydrophilic outer shell and relatively hydrophobic cavity, cyclodextrins are able to form inclusion complexes with a wide variety of suitable hydrophobic molecules (4) eg, nonpolar hydrocarbons, polar carboxylic acid, and amine derivatives (Fig. 2, Table 2). This phenomenon leads to significant changes of the solubility and reactivity of the guest molecules without any chemical modification. Water-insoluble molecules become completely water-soluble by treatment with aqueous solution of native cyclodextrins or their derivatives, eg, methylated or hydroxypropylated cyclodextrins. 

Cyclodextrins are cyclic oligosaccharides. Their molecules have a hydrophilic outside, which can dissolve in water, and hydrophobic cavity. As a result of this cavity, cyclodextrins are able to form inclusion complexes with a wide variety of hydrophobic guest molecules. This can cause an improved bioavailability and increased pharmacological effects of guest molecules [10]. 

Cyclodextrins are macrocyclic compounds comprised of D-glucose bonded through 1,4-a-linkages and produced enzymatically from starch. The greek letter which proceeds the name indicates the number of glucose units incorporated in the CD (eg, a = 6, /5 = 7, 7 = 8, etc). Cyclodextrins are toroidal shaped molecules with a relatively hydrophobic internal cavity (Fig. 6). The exterior is relatively hydrophilic because of the presence of the primary and secondary hydroxyls. The primary C-6 hydroxyls are free to rotate and can partially block the CD cavity from one end. The mouth of the opposite end of the CD cavity is encircled by the C-2 and C-3 secondary hydroxyls. The restricted conformational freedom and orientation of these secondary hydroxyls is thought to be responsible for the chiral recognition inherent in these molecules (77). 

Calixarenes (from the Latin ca/ x) may be understood as artificial receptor analogues of the natural cyclodextrins (96,97). In its prototypical form they feature a macrocycHc metacyclophane framework bearing protonizable hydroxy groups made from condensation of -substituted phenols with formaldehyde (Fig. 15b). Dependent on the ring size, benzene derivatives are the substrates most commonly included into the calix cavity (98), but other interesting substrates such as C q have also been accommodated (Fig. 8c) (45). 

Packing of the cyclodexthn molecules (a, P, P) within the crystal lattice of iaclusion compounds (58,59) occurs in one of two modes, described as cage and channel stmctures (Fig. 7). In channel-type inclusions, cyclodextrin molecules are stacked on top of one another like coins in a roU producing endless channels in which guest molecules are embedded (Fig. 7a). In crystal stmctures of the cage type, the cavity of one cyclodextrin molecule is blocked off on both sides by neighboring cyclodextrin molecules packed crosswise in herringbone fashion (Fig. 7b), or in a motif reminiscent of bricks in a wall (Fig. 7c). 

As a final example we consider noncovalent molecular complex formation with the macrocyclic ligand a-cyclodextrin, a natural product consisting of six a-D-glucose units linked 1-4 to form a torus whose cavity is capable of including molecules the size of an aromatic ring. Table 4-3 gives some rate constants for this reaction, where L represents the cyclodextrin and S is the substrate ... 

Macaudiere et al. first reported the enantiomeric separation of racemic phosphine oxides and amides on native cyclodextrin-based CSPs under subcritical conditions [53]. The separations obtained were indicative of inclusion complexation. When the CO,-methanol eluent used in SFC was replaced with hexane-ethanol in LC, reduced selectivity was observed. The authors proposed that the smaller size of the CO, molecule made it less likely than hexane to compete with the analyte for the cyclodextrin cavity. 

Water plays a crucial role in the inclusion process. Although cyclodextrin does form inclusion complexes in such nonaqueous solvents as dimethyl sulfoxide, the binding is very weak compared with that in water 13 Recently, it has been shown that the thermodynamic stabilities of some inclusion complexes in aqueous solutions decrease markedly with the addition of dimethyl sulfoxide to the solutions 14,15>. Kinetic parameters determined for inclusion reactions also revealed that the rate-determining step of the reactions is the breakdown of the water structure around a substrate molecule and/or within the cyclodextrin cavity 16,17). 

On the other hand, the values of AH° and AS° for a-cyclodextrin-l-alkanol systems are significantly more negative than those for the corresponding P-cyclOdextrin systems. 1-Alkanols must fit closely into the cavity of a-cyclodextrin, so that the com-plexation is governed by van der Waals interaction rather than by hydrophobic interaction. 

Fig. 2. Geometries calculated (solid lines) and observed (bold dashed lines) for 1-propanol in its a-cyclodextrin adduct. G3 and G6 denote the numbers of glucopyranose units of a-cyclodextrin. H3 and H5 refer to the hydrogen atoms located inside of the cyclodextrin cavity. The hydrogen atoms for the observed geometry of 1-propanol are not shown, since their atomic coordinates have not been determined. The observed 1-propanol is twofold disordered, with site a occupied 80%, site b 20%. Interatomic distances are shown in bold italics on fine dashed lines (nm). Reproduced with permission from the Chemical Society of Japan...

In this equation, AG°CS is taken to be negligible for p- and y-cyclodextrin systems and to be constant, if there is any, for the a-cyclodextrin system. The AG W term is virtually independent of the kind of guest molecules, though it is dependent on the size of the cyclodextrin cavity. The AG dw term is divided into two terms, AG°,ec and AGs°ter, which correspond to polar (dipole-dipole or dipole-induced dipole) interactions and London dispersion forces, respectively. The former is mainly governed by the electronic factor, the latter by the steric factor, of a guest molecule. Thus, Eq. 2 is converted to Eq. 3 for the complexation of a particular cyclodextrin with a homogeneous series of guest molecules ... 

These equations show that hydrophobic and steric (van der Waals) interactions are of prime importance in the inclusion processes of cyclodextrin-alcohol systems. The coefficient of Es was positive in sign for an a-cyclodextrin system and negative for a P-cyclodextrin system. These clear-cut differences in sign reflect the fact that a bulky alcohol is subject to van der Waals repulsion by the a-cyclodextrin cavity and to van der Waals attraction by the p-cyclodextrin cavity. 

Upon formulating these relationships, phenols with branched alkyl substituents were not included in the data of a-cyclodextrin systems, though they were included in (3-cyclodextrin systems. In all the above equations, the n term was statistically significant at the 99.5 % level of confidence, indicating that the hydrophobic interaction plays a decisive role in the complexation of cyclodextrin with phenols. The Ibrnch term was statistically significant at the 99.5% level of confidence for (3-cyclo-dextrin complexes with m- and p-substituted phenols. The stability of the complexes increases with an increasing number of branches in substituents. This was ascribed to the attractive van der Waals interaction due to the close fitness of the branched substituents to the (3-cyclodextrin cavity. The steric effect of substituents was also observed for a-cyclodextrin complexes with p-substituted phenols (Eq. 22). In this case, the B parameter was used in place of Ibmch, since no phenol with a branched... 

Only the hydrophobic and steric terms were involved in these equations. There are a few differences between these equations and the corresponding equations for cyclo-dextrin-substituted phenol systems. However, it is not necessarily required that the mechanism for complexation between cyclodextrin and phenyl acetates be the same as that for cyclodextrin-phenol systems. The kinetically determined Kj values are concerned only with productive forms of inclusion complexes. The productive forms may be similar in structure to the tetrahedral intermediates of the reactions. To attain such geometry, the penetration of substituents of phenyl acetates into the cyclodextrin cavity must be shallow, compared with the cases of the corresponding phenol systems, so that the hydrogen bonding between the substituents of phenyl acetates and the C-6 hydroxyl groups of cyclodextrin may be impossible. 

---