Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Layer spreading model

Microscopically, the interface reaction during crystal growth may be through various mechanisms. One mechanism is called the continuous model. Two other models are layer-spreading models. [Pg.348]

There are two layer-spreading models. In these models, the crystal surface is atomically flat except at screw dislocations or steps of a partially grown surface layer. If there are screw dislocations, growth would continue on the screw... [Pg.348]

Figure 3.10. Schematic to show the layer-by-layer growth model due to two-dimensional nucleation. This figure assumes the mode of nucleation to be the mononuclear model. Other models, such as the poly-nuclear or birth and spread models, as explained in the text, may also be considered. Figure 3.10. Schematic to show the layer-by-layer growth model due to two-dimensional nucleation. This figure assumes the mode of nucleation to be the mononuclear model. Other models, such as the poly-nuclear or birth and spread models, as explained in the text, may also be considered.
A birth and spread model, which allows nucleation and advancement of one growth layer at a time on one surface. [Pg.39]

In the mononuclear model, the limiting step is the formation of a nucleus. Once one is formed, the subsequent growth spreading across the crystal surface is infinitely rapid. For the polynuclear model, the spreading velocity is taken as zero and the crystal surface can only be covered by the accumulation of a sufficient number of nuclei. These two growth models represent two extreme cases. A third model, known as the birth-and-spread model, allows for formation of nuclei and their subsequent growth at a finite rate. In this case, new nuclei can form on top of uncompleted layers. [Pg.147]

Figure 9.7 gives a representation of the diffuse double layer. This model is also known as the Gouy-Chapman layer (named after the persons who first developed the model). The underlying picture is that the surface is located at jc = 0 and that the counterions are not only attracted by the surface but are also subject to thermal motion. The former force tends to accumulate all counterions at the distance of closest approach to the surface (as in the molecular condenser), whereas the latter tries to spread all counterions homogeneously in the solution. The co-ions are subjected to similar counteracting tendencies. See Figure 9.1. The resulting countercharge distribution is given by the Boltzmann equation ... Figure 9.7 gives a representation of the diffuse double layer. This model is also known as the Gouy-Chapman layer (named after the persons who first developed the model). The underlying picture is that the surface is located at jc = 0 and that the counterions are not only attracted by the surface but are also subject to thermal motion. The former force tends to accumulate all counterions at the distance of closest approach to the surface (as in the molecular condenser), whereas the latter tries to spread all counterions homogeneously in the solution. The co-ions are subjected to similar counteracting tendencies. See Figure 9.1. The resulting countercharge distribution is given by the Boltzmann equation ...
The pressure-induced transition from a fluid to a solid phase in phospholipid mono-layers spread on an air/water interface is associated with aggregation processes leading to smooth solid domain shapes as well as fractal or dendritic morphologies/ depending on the experimental circumstances. In these monolayers, it is the diffusion of a dye impurity only miscible in the fluid phase which is responsible for the tenuous solid domains. The two-dimensional model presented in the present work not only identifies and clarifies the non-equilibrium fractal-forming mechanism underlying the experimental observations but also describes qualitatively the experimentally observed crossover from non-equilibrium fractal growth to equilibrium compact solid domains at late times. [Pg.292]

The models mentioned earlier are limited to single cell. McKay et al. [29] has developed a two-phase isothermal ID model of reactant and water dynamics. It is validated nsing a multicell stack. The lumped parameter model depends on six tunable parameters associated with the estimation of voltage, the membrane water v or transportation, and the accumulation of liquid water in the gas channels. The water flooding fault is embedded in this model by the assumption of liquid water layer of uniform thickness at the GDL channel interface. This water layer spreads across the GDL surfece as the liquid water volume in the channel increases, thus, reducing the surface area. This increases the calculated current density that will reduce the cell voltage at a fixed total stack current. [Pg.565]

Models used to describe the growth of crystals by layers call for a two-step process (/) formation of a two-dimensional nucleus on the surface and (2) spreading of the solute from the two-dimensional nucleus across the surface. The relative rates at which these two steps occur give rise to the mononuclear two-dimensional nucleation theory and the polynuclear two-dimensional nucleation theory. In the mononuclear two-dimensional nucleation theory, the surface nucleation step occurs at a finite rate, whereas the spreading across the surface is assumed to occur at an infinite rate. The reverse is tme for the polynuclear two-dimensional nucleation theory. Erom the mononuclear two-dimensional nucleation theory, growth is related to supersaturation by the equation. [Pg.344]

At present there is no small-scale test for predicting whether or how fast a fire will spread on a wall made of flammable or semiflammable (fire-retardant) material. The principal elements of the problem include pyrolysis of solids char-layer buildup buoyant, convective, tmbulent-boundary-layer heat transfer soot formation in the flame radiative emission from the sooty flame and the transient natme of the process (char buildup, fuel burnout, preheating of areas not yet ignited). Efforts are needed to develop computer models for these effects and to develop appropriate small-scale tests. [Pg.131]

Presently it is not possible to relax the Cu lattice at the SCF level, since from a computational point of view it is composed of two different kinds of Cu atoms (those with and without the ECP). Also questions of wetting, i.e. whether the chemisorbed Be4 would prefer to remain as a tetrahedron (or distorted tetrahedron) or to spread out to a single layer are still not amenable to ab initio study. These questions have not yet been investigated using the parameterized model approach, because of the problems associated with modeling Be2 and Beg as accurately as larger Be clusters. Nonetheless, these preliminary results show that the parameterized and ab initio calculations can be used to complement each other in a multicomponent system, just as for single component systems. [Pg.28]

X-ray diffraction has been applied to spread monolayers as reviewed by Dutta [67] and Als-Nielsen et al. [68], The structure of heneicosanoic acid on Cu and Ca containing subphases as a function of pH has been reported [69], as well as a detailed study of the ordered phases of behenic acid [70], along with many other smdies. Langmuir-Blod-gett films have also been studied by x-ray diffraction. Some recent studies include LB film structure just after transfer [71], variations in the structure of cadmium stearate LB films with temperature [72], and characterization of the structure of cadmium arachidate LB films [73], X-ray [74,75] and neutron reflectivity [76,77] data on LB films can be used to model the density profile normal to the interface and to obtain values of layer thickness and roughness. [Pg.69]

In traditional models of an eleetrified interfaee, metal electrons are artificially localized within the eleetrode. This leads to misinterpretation of the electronic influences on the compact layer, Ch in those models would always be smaller than its ideal conductor limit (with electrode eharge spread over an infinitesimally thin region at the electrode surface x = 0)... [Pg.78]

The percolation model of adsorption response outlined in this section is based on assumption of existence of a broad spread between heights of inter-crystalline energy barriers in polycrystals. This assumption is valid for numerous polycrystalline semiconductors [145, 146] and for oxides of various metals in particular. The latter are characterized by practically stoichiometric content of surface-adjacent layers. It will be shown in the next chapter that these are these oxides that are characterized by chemisorption-caused response in their electrophysical parameters mainly generated by adsorption charging of adsorbent surface [32, 52, 155]. The availability of broad spread in heights of inter-crystalline barriers in above polycrystallites was experimentally proved by various techniques. These are direct measurements of the drop of potentials on probe contacts during mapping microcrystal pattern [145] and the studies of the value of exponential factor of ohmic electric conductivity of the material which was L/l times lower than the expected one in case of identical... [Pg.72]

Downward flame spread for scenario B. Once the horizontal, concurrent flame spread along the wall ceiling intersection has reached an opposite corner in the compartment the downward flame spread in the upper layer starts. In reality, this could possibly start happening during the concurrent flame spread time interval. In the current version of the model, no account is taken of the relatively low oxygen concentration in the upper layer. The flame spread is quite slow at first since the wall material has a relatively low sur-... [Pg.585]

In this model, the rate of river runoff (uriver) expressed as the depth of a layer of water produced by spreading the annual river-water input across the entire surfece area of the ocean. The annual amount of river water entering the ocean is 47,000 km /y (Figure 2.1). Assuming that the average area of the ocean is equal to that at the sea surfece (3.6 x 10 cm ), the river input represents the annual addition of a layer of water approximately 10 cm deep, making y ver = lOcm/y. [Pg.229]

The calculations are rather easy and have already been performed for models like (1) the ideal solution model where enrichment is always confined to the outmost layer (29), (2) the ideal or regular solution model with one-layer enrichment, taking into account the difference in atomic radii (strain energy) (30-32), (3) the regular solution model with enrichment spread over n (up to 4) layers (35), and (4) intermetallic compounds (37). [Pg.153]


See other pages where Layer spreading model is mentioned: [Pg.349]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.583]    [Pg.620]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.39]   


SEARCH



Layer model

Layered models

Models layer model

Spread layer

Spreading layer

Spreading model

© 2024 chempedia.info