Knowledge, of the physical world

When we talk about knowledge of the physical world, we generally refer to facts derived from systematic observation, study, and experimentation as well as the concepts and theories based on these facts. This is contrasted with belief (faith, intuition) in the spiritual or supernatural. 

The proceedings of the old Solvay Conferences in Physics forever will remain sources of information of a unique kind about the historical development of our present views. It is much more difficult, perhaps impossible, to make a similar statement about the more recent Solvay Conferences. Only in 10 or 20 years from now will they be seen in the right perspective. What we know with certainty, from now, is that the 17 Solvay Conferences in Physics provide in their ensemble a succession of pictures of the state of our knowledge of the physical world as it was changing at intervals of a few years, all taken with the same camera from essentially the same point of view. ... 

Heisenberg s response was his second major breakthrough The uncertainty principle that places a limit on the accuracy with which certain properties can be simultaneously known. In particular, the simultaneous measurement of both the position and the momentum of a particle can be known only to h/ ir (with h as Planck s constant). One can measure the position of a particle to an infinite level of precision, but then its momentum has an infinite uncertainty and vice versa. This sets an absolute limit on human knowledge of the physical world and leads to the idea of quantum mechanical probability. 

A discovery is the revelation of something that exists in nature, does not aim at pre-established practical purposes, and only increases the sum of human knowledge of the physical world. In contrast, an invention is a solution to a technical problem that seeks to satisfy predetermined ends and practical needs. It can be said that discovery is not the inventive spirit that acts, but the speculative spirit and the faculties of observation, so that with a discovery we are in the field of science and speculative intellect, while with invention we penetrate the domain of engineering and practical intellect (Gama Cerqueira, 1982). 

Sense perception gives us a very incomplete, limited and imperfect contact with the physical world, but it is the basis of all knowledge of the physical world. 

Most teachers and students see physical chemistry as an immense body of accumulated knowledge rather than seeing it as avenues that can be taken as we try to make sense of a part of the physical world. (2)... 

The point is to simplify and to order knowledge. The profession I m part of has as its whole function the rendering of the physical world understandable and beautiful. Otherwise, you have only tables and statistics. 

Positivists assert that the risks are directly observable and measurable science is provable9. Relativists hold the view that scientific knowledge is bounded by paradigms of our understanding of the physical world [6]. Paradigms are incommensurable, so scientific discoveries are therefore always relative [7]. Two forms of relativism are differentiated constrained [6] and unconstrained [8]. The latter approach holds that the real world is 100% constructed through social and cultural influences [9]. The three approaches of positivism, constrained relativism and unconstrained relativism are schematically represented in Figure 1.1. 

The environmental chemistry of chlorinated paraffins was first reviewed in the Handbook of Environmental Chemistry by Zitko [4]. There have been many other reviews, especially for environmental and human exposure assessment, beginning with a report prepared for the US Environmental Protection Agency by Howard et al. [5] and more recently by Mukherjee [6], Environment Canada [2], UK Dept of the Environment [7], the World Health Organization [8], and by Tomy et al. [9], In addition to environmental chemistry aspects, the above reviews have covered the toxicity and bio accumulation of PCAs. This chapter will focus on the recent advances in knowledge of the physical properties, degradation, analysis, and environmental levels of PCAs with special emphasis on the Cio-Cu group. 

Both nature and society put serious restraints on everyone. Survival in the real world demands cautious self-restraint, and first of all, laborious creation of new knowledge about the physical world, natural laws, and society with significant practical consequences. Such knowledge can only be obtained by tedious observation and a never-ending testing of facts. It is obvious that... 

It has been said that the last person who could cover the whole scientific knowledge of his time was the German naturalist Alexander Humboldt (t7 9-1859>, as shown in his conception of the physical world in Kosmos, written at the midpoint of the last century (Britannica). 

Curiosity is an Important part of the scientific enterprise because scientists need a strong desire to investigate and learn about the behavior of nature. Science must start with the question why. The scientific method is then utilized to accumulate systematized knowledge about the physical world. A scientist s curiosity is incapable of being satisfied. Without this curious nature of the scientist, the advancement of science would not have occurred as we presently know it. 

World databases of people brought into the same social spaces. Spaces in which knowledge is brought together about specific subjects. Representations of the physical world in cyberspace using the Earth as an organizing principle. ... 

The answers to these questions depend on how we view science and its development. One way to view science—diet s call it the traditional view—is as the continual accumulation of knowledge and the building of increasingly precise theories. In this view, a scientific theory is a model of the world that reflects what is actually in nature. New observations and experiments result in gradual adjustments to theories. Over time, theories get better, giving us a more accurate picture of the physical world. 

---