Kinetics Enzyme-Substrate Affinity

In case of equilibrium, addition of labeled PPi yields labeled ATP and this product can be employed to detect NRPS or related enzymes. The respective reaction rates provide information on adenylate formation/pyrophosphoiylysis, apparent Km of substrates and substrate analogs, and with some enzyme kinetic efforts, substrate affinities and the patterns of substrate binding may be deduced. The ease and the sensitivity of the procedure makes it the primary method of investigation of NRPS substrate specificity. 

Substrate and product inhibitions analyses involved considerations of competitive, uncompetitive, non-competitive and mixed inhibition models. The kinetic studies of the enantiomeric hydrolysis reaction in the membrane reactor included inhibition effects by substrate (ibuprofen ester) and product (2-ethoxyethanol) while varying substrate concentration (5-50 mmol-I ). The initial reaction rate obtained from experimental data was used in the primary (Hanes-Woolf plot) and secondary plots (1/Vmax versus inhibitor concentration), which gave estimates of substrate inhibition (K[s) and product inhibition constants (A jp). The inhibitor constant (K[s or K[v) is a measure of enzyme-inhibitor affinity. It is the dissociation constant of the enzyme-inhibitor complex. 

Table 5.1 presents the intrinsic kinetic parameters (Km and Vln lx) for the free lipase system and apparent kinetic parameters (K and V ) for the immobilised lipase in the EMR using fixed 2g-l 1 lipase concentration. The immobilised lipase showed higher maximum apparent reaction rate and greater enzyme-substrate (ES) affinity compared with free lipase. 

Electrophoretic and kinetic studies of the patient s enzyme have been reported in several cases (F10). Most of them showed decreased substrate affinity and abnormal electrophoretic mobility. The main cause of P5N deficiency is considered to be an abnormality of P5N-I, probably arising from a structural gene mutation (H6). The precise molecular defect has not been clarified, because the normal gene for P5N-I has not been isolated. 

Kinetics of Free and Mao-osoib-Bound eaiymc. The results of the Lineweaver-Burk analysis of the initial rates for free and immobilized enzyme appear in Table I. The increase in the substrate affinity parameter due to some internal mass transfer limitations in the IME as no substrate-matrix interactions were present. The increase... 

In both reactions with the meso substrates, no intermediary monoadduct could be detected. Consequently, a potential kinetic preference of the aldolase for either of the competing enantiotopic hydroxyaldehyde moieties within the starting substrates could not be investigated. No matter which of the enantiotopic aldehyde groups is attacked first, however, the second addition steps must be kinetically faster in each case, probably supported by the presence of an anionic charge in the intermediates, which should improve the substrate affinity to the enzyme. 

The comparison of the kinetic data for recombinant SuSyl from yeast and E. coli revealed no significant changes in the substrate affinities (Table 2.2.6.2) (Sauer-zapfe and Elling, unpublished results). The influence of phosphorylation of SuSy on the enzyme s affinity for sucrose and UDP are discussed controversially in the literature. Nakai et al. found an increase in the substrates affinities [16] however, Zhang et al. could not detect changes in the kinetic data for SuSy from soybean nodules [12]. With reference to our work, the expression in a eukaryotic or prokaryotic host influences the protein chemical characteristics of SuSyl. However, we cannot yet decide whether recombinant SuSyl from yeast is phosphorylated. 

The alternative explanation for the phenomenon is that bacterial communities respond physiologically to changes in DOM inputs rather than by replacing populations. Bacteria obviously have some capacity to physiologically adapt, but their reservoir of genetic information is limited, and fundamental parameters such as uptake rates and substrate affinities are determined by cell size and enzyme structure, which may be difficult to modulate. Microcosm studies suggest that changes in productivity and enzyme kinetics measured 24-48 h after DOM amendment are associated with displacements in community composition as measured by DNA comparison techniques (see Chapter 14). 

Competitive inhibitors do not change the value of Vmax> which is reached when sufficiently high concentrations of the substrate are present so as to completely displace the inhibitor. However, the affinity of the substrate for the enzyme appears to be decreased in the presence of a competitive inhibitor. This happens because the free enzyme E is not only in equilibrium with the enzyme-substrate complex E. S, but also with the enzyme-inhibitor complex E. L Competitive inhibitors increase the apparent of the substrate by a factor of (1 + The evaluation of the kinetics is again greatly facilitated by the conversion of Equation 17.15 into a linear form using Line-weaver-Burk, Eadie-Hofstee, or Hanes-Woolf plots, as shown in Fig. 17.7. 

A transesterication reaction occurs that results in cleavage of the substrate and ligation of the 3 -portion of the substrate (Tsang and Joyce 1994). Just like in the case of enzyme- or catalytic antibody-catalyzed reactions, the rate depends upon substrate binding affinity and the intrinsic catalytic rate parameters. For example, in ester hydrolysis there is a hyperbolic dependence on the concentration of the ribozyme at low concentration of catalyst the rate of hydrolysis is first order, while at high concentration of catalyst the reaction rate is indepen-dent of ribozyme concentration (Piccirilli et al. 1992). This type of saturation or Michaelis-Menten kinetic behavior is typical of ribozymes and is completely analogous to the enzyme-substrate complex observed for enzymes and catalytic antibodies. 

In textbooks dealing with enzyme kinetics, it is customary to distinguish four types of reversible inhibitions (i) competitive (ii) noncompetitive (iii) uncompetitive and, (iv) mixed inhibition. Competitive inhibition, e.g., given by the product which retains an affinity for the active site, is very common. Non-competitive inhibition, however, is very rarely encountered, if at all. Uncompetitive inhibition, i.e. where the inhibitor binds to the enzyme-substrate complex but not to the free enzyme, occurs also quite often, as does the mixed inhibition, which is a combination of competitive and uncompetitive inhibitions. The simple Michaelis-Menten equation can still be used, but with a modified Ema, or i.e. ... 

In pure noncompetitive inhibition, the inhibitor binds with equal affinity to the free enzyme and to the enzyme-substrate (ES) complex. In noncompetitive inhibition, the enzyme-inhibitor-substrate complex IES does not react to give product P. A kinetic scheme for noncompetitive inhibition is given in Figure 6.41... 

The reaction rate depends on the concentrations of the enzyme [ ] and the substrate [5], as well as on the turnover number, ks, and the Michaelis-Menten-constant (Km), which, broadly speaking, quantifies the enzyme s affinity for its substrate. The catalytic activity of an enzyme also depends on temperature, pH, ionic strength and the presence of inhibitors or activators. For a more detailed discussion of enzyme kinetics, refer to one of the biochemistry textbooks listed at the end of this chapter. A suitable enzyme for labelling must be stable under the necessary reaction conditions and it must have a high turnover rate. 

Great affinity between enzyme and substrate, i.e., a high probability for the formation of an enzyme-substrate complex, which is equivalent to a sharp increase in reagent concentrations under conventional conditions (proximity effect). Actually the acceleration mechanism in this case involves a stabilization of the activated complex due to hydrophobic or electrostatic interactions and, in certain cases, even the formation of hydrogen bonds. The kinetic role of stabilization of the activated state in enzymatic catalysis has been most adequately dealt with in Reference (7). 

A comment on Km-Michaelis constant, an often cited parameter, is indicative of both thermodynamic and kinetic properties of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction itself, however, Km is a measure of neither. Given that it contains the rate constant for the enzyme-substrate association in the denominator, Xm = (k i +k2)/ki, (where rate = fcl[ ][S] fci[ ]for [S] > > [ ]), Michaelis constant is inversely proportional to the affinity of an enzyme for substrate the higher the rate of this reaction, the lower the Km-... 

---