Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular ionization efficiency

In the ideal case for REMPI, the efficiency of ion production is proportional to the line strength factors for 2-photon excitation [M], since the ionization step can be taken to have a wavelength- and state-mdependent efficiency. In actual practice, fragment ions can be produced upon absorption of a fouitli photon, or the ionization efficiency can be reduced tinough predissociation of the electronically excited state. It is advisable to employ experimentally measured ionization efficiency line strengdi factors to calibrate the detection sensitivity. With sufficient knowledge of the excited molecular electronic states, it is possible to understand the state dependence of these intensity factors [65]. [Pg.2083]

Surface analysis by non-resonant (NR-) laser-SNMS [3.102-3.106] has been used to improve ionization efficiency while retaining the advantages of probing the neutral component. In NR-laser-SNMS, an intense laser beam is used to ionize, non-selec-tively, all atoms and molecules within the volume intersected by the laser beam (Eig. 3.40b). With sufficient laser power density it is possible to saturate the ionization process. Eor NR-laser-SNMS adequate power densities are typically achieved in a small volume only at the focus of the laser beam. This limits sensitivity and leads to problems with quantification, because of the differences between the effective ionization volumes of different elements. The non-resonant post-ionization technique provides rapid, multi-element, and molecular survey measurements with significantly improved ionization efficiency over SIMS, although it still suffers from isoba-ric interferences. [Pg.132]

A multitude of semiempirical and semiclassical theories have been developed to calculate electron impact ionization cross sections of atoms and atomic ions, with relatively few for the more complicated case of molecular electron impact ionization cross sections. One of the earlier treatments of molecular targets was that of Jain and Khare.38 Two of the more successful recent approaches are the method proposed by Deutsch and Mark and coworkers12-14 and the binary-encounter Bethe method developed by Kim and Rudd.15,16 The observation of a strong correlation between the maximum in the ionization efficiency curve and the polarizability of the target resulted in the semiempirical polarizability model which depends only on the polarizability, ionization potential, and maximum electron impact ionization cross section of the target molecule.39,40 These and other methods will be considered in detail below. [Pg.328]

The interaction will become weaker as the electron wavelength becomes greater or less than the molecular diameter with a consequential decrease in the cross section. This leads to an expression for the ionization probability as a function of electron energy, giving the shape of the ionization efficiency curve,... [Pg.337]

This expression reproduces the experimentally measured ionization efficiency curves surprisingly well, considering the simplicity of the model on which it is based. There is a discontinuity in the function at the maximum (when X = Xmax) but this affects only a small region of the ionization efficiency curve, and satisfactory values of the cross section are still obtained over this region. A great advantage of this method is that it is very simple to apply, depending on only three parameters the molecular polarizability volume, the ionization potential, and the maximum electron impact ionization cross section. These can be measured or calculated values (from the ab initio EM method described above, for example). [Pg.338]

The equilibrium constants can be approximated by ratios of ion currents in some instances otherwise, the currents are converted to partial pressures by comparison with the evaporation of known amounts of a standard material. Various geometric corrections (K) such as the solid angle subtended by the sample at the orifice, the Clausing factor for orifice geometry, molecular cross-section (o-), which control ionization efficiency, and detector efficiency are included in the general relationship... [Pg.27]

An enormous amount of work has been done in this wide field and a number of excellent reviews on different aspects of sulfur electrochemistry has been published [1-7], so here we confine our attention to some principal reactions and interesting apphcations of both anodic and cathodic activation of sulfur-containing molecules. Compared to other chalco-genides, sulfur has frontier orbitals that have volume, symmetry, and energy more suitable for efficient interaction with adjacent carbon atoms. The ionization of molecular sulfur requires about 10 eV. Conjugation of the pz orbitals of sulfur with a 7T-system lowers the ionization potential by ca. 2 eV. For this reason, compounds of divalent sulfur undergo oxidation rather easily often giving rise to cation radicals or dications. The stability of this species is in line with the... [Pg.237]

Strictly speaking, every molecular species has an ionization efficiency curve of its own depending on the ionization cross section of the specific molecule. In case of methane, this issue has been studied repeatedly (Fig. 2.3). [18] The ionization cross section describes an area through which the electron must travel in order to effectively interact with the neutral and consequently, the ionization cross section is given in units of square-meters. Ionization cross section graphs are all of the same type exhibiting a maximum at electron energies around 70 eV (Chap. 5.1.3). [Pg.20]

Unfortunately, there are also some disadvantages i) the decreased ionization efficiency at 12-15 eV also means a significant loss of sensitivity (Fig. 5.4), ii) low ion source temperatures cause long-lasting memory of previous samples due to slow desorption from the surfaces that have been in contact with the sample vapor, and iii) a weak molecular ion peak may well be enhanced, however, a spectrum showing no molecular ion peak at 70 eV will not turn into a spectrum exhibiting a strong molecular ion peak at 12 eV. [Pg.199]

ALIS measures the MS response of the ligand following its dissociation from the protein-ligand complex. Therefore, the magnitude of the MS response corresponds to the equilibrium concentration of the receptor-ligand complex concentration [ S] times the compound s MS calibration factor Cms, which depends on the ionization efficiency and other molecular properties of the ligand ... [Pg.132]

In summary, preliminary experiments have demonstrated that the efficiency and outcome of electron ionization is influenced by molecular orientation. That is, the magnitude of the electron impact ionization cross section depends on the spatial orientation of the molecule widi respect to the electron projectile. The ionization efficiency is lowest for electron impact on the negative end of the molecular dipole. In addition, the mass spectrum is orientation-dependent for example, in the ionization of CH3CI the ratio CHjCriCHj depends on the molecular orientation. There are both similarities in and differences between the effect of orientation on electron transfer (as an elementary step in the harpoon mechanism) and electron impact ionization, but there is a substantial effect in both cases. It seems likely that other types of particle interactions, for example, free-radical chemistry and ion-molecule chemistry, may also exhibit a dependence on relative spatial orientation. The information emerging from these studies should contribute one more perspective to our view of particle interactions and eventually to a deeper understanding of complex chemical and biological reaction mechanisms. [Pg.37]

The low ionization efficiency can be boosted by adding a suitable substance, called dopant, at the same concentration level of the analyte [57] (see Ref. [49]).The dopant ionization energy must be lower than 10 eV, the energy of the photons, and is ionized producing a molecular ion ... [Pg.244]

Characterization of the neutral processes is far more difficult, and little information is available at present. However, studies on some simple molecules (see Section V) have indicated that the ionization efficiency approaches unity quite rapidly as the energy loss increases above threshold, suggesting that, except where transitions to Rydberg states just below a new ionization threshold are significant, the dominant mode of energy loss in the far UV is by ionization often accompanied by molecular fragmentation. [Pg.13]

These reactions occur under high vacuum. Thus, no ion-molecule reaction occurs. The species formed during the ionization process is a radical cation. Ionization efficiency depends on the ionization energy of the molecule. The presence or not of the molecular ions also depends on how easy it fragments. [Pg.77]

Provided that very accurate ionization-efficiency data are available, the second differential of the ionization efficiency curve can yield ionization potentials in good agreement with spectroscopic values without assumptions about the relative amounts of sample and reference compounds (Morrison, 1951). Different molecular energy levels may be discerned, but there are difficulties caused by scatter in the ionization-efficiency data and lack of knowledge of the electron-energy distribution in any given experiment (Morrison, 1963). [Pg.180]


See other pages where Molecular ionization efficiency is mentioned: [Pg.64]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.668]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.271]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.264 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info