Ionic combining with supercritical fluids

It must be also noted that supported ionic liquid phase (SILP) catalysis can also be successfully combined with supercritical fluids. Cole-Hamilton et al. [127] have reported recently high activity (rates up to 800 h ), stable performances (>40 h) and minimum rhodium leaching (0.5 ppm) in the hydroformylation of 1-octene using a system that involves flowing the substrate, reacting gases and products dissolved in... 

There are several appealing factors for the use of micellar supercritical phases in chromatography. The peak efficiencies obtained in SFC are higher than in LC because the solute diffusion coefficients are higher in supercritical fluids than in liquids. In SFC, mass transfers are enhanced by the combination of high diffiision coefficients and low viscosities. This could compensate for the low efficiency induced by micelles. The polar aqueous core of the reverse micelles should allow the separation of hydrophilic or even ionic solutes with supercritical fluids. These polar compounds are difficult to analyze in SFC [10]. 

Ionic liquids in combination with supercritical fluids are a versatile tool for the immobilization and recycling of homogeneous catalysts, allowing continuous Friedel-Crafts acylation reactions to be realized. The acylation of anisole with acetic anhydride is carried out in a flow system using a metal triflate immobilized in the ionic liquid 1 -butyl-4-methylpyridinium bis(trifluoro-methylsulfonyl)imide as catalyst and scCO as continuous extraction phase [22]. Different metal triflates are utilized under continuous flow conditions using high pressure yttrium triflate possesses the best balance between sufficient acidity for catalytic activity and softness to release the product and so permits a good catalyst reuse (TONs up to 190). 

Supercritical fluid extraction — During the past two decades, important progress was registered in the extraction of bioactive phytochemicals from plant or food matrices. Most of the work in this area focused on non-polar compounds (terpenoid flavors, hydrocarbons, carotenes) where a supercritical (SFE) method with CO2 offered high extraction efficiencies. Co-solvent systems combining CO2 with one or more modifiers extended the utility of the SFE-CO2 system to polar and even ionic compounds, e.g., supercritical water to extract polar compounds. This last technique claims the additional advantage of combining extraction and destruction of contaminants via the supercritical water oxidation process."... 

The development of phase transfer catalysis, of supercritical fluids, of ionic liquids and of course, new reagents, should also have considerable potential in the labeling area. Furthermore there is the possibility of combining these approaches with energy-enhanced conditions - in this way marked improvements can be expected. 

Supercritical fluids (e.g. supercritical carbon dioxide, scCCb) are regarded as benign alternatives to organic solvents and there are many examples of their use in chemical synthesis, but usually under homogeneous conditions without the need for other solvents. However, SCCO2 has been combined with ionic liquids for the hydroformylation of 1-octene [16]. Since ionic liquids have no vapour pressure and are essentially insoluble in SCCO2, the product can be extracted from the reaction using CO2 virtually uncontaminated by the rhodium catalyst. This process is not a true biphasic process, as the reaction is carried out in the ionic liquid and the supercritical phase is only added once reaction is complete. 

In the case of homogeneous catalysis, employing supercritical fluids enables complete recovery of the expensive transition metal species. Also, these species may have environmentally unfriendly effects if not recovered completely. The combination of ionic liquids with the supercritical fluid can lead to product isolation as well as catalyst immobilization. Thus, catalysts can be recycled batchwise. ... 

There are various possible approaches for multiphase operation of homogeneous catalysis, to improve their usability and recycle processes with organic/organic, organic/aqueous, or fluorous solvent pairs (solvent combinations), non-aqueous ionic solvents, supercritical fluids, and systems with soluble polymers. Figure 2.2 reports a general scheme of the possibilities for homogeneous catalysis. 

Unfortunately, most polymers are insoluble in supercritical C02, and hence extraction from the ionic liquid by this method is difficult. However, if C02-soluble polymers were synthesized (for example, fluoropolymers and polysi-loxanes), then this method has the potential to be a very useful approach. Moreover, supercritical fluid-swollen ionic liquids offer a new solvent system that combines the viscosity-lowering properties of the supercritical fluid with the good solubilizing properties of the ionic liquid and may be a hybrid exotic solvent of the future. 

Indeed, flow processes are already combined with functionalized solid phases, with ionic liquids, supercritical fluids such as carbon dioxide, and microwave irradiation. Nevertheless, numerous examples of above mentioned processes with standard and more and less innovative laboratory equipment take advantage of this new approach. Whatever chemists and chemical engineers require - synthesis of few milligrams of compounds in drug chemistry, synthesis of building blocks on a multigram scale for parallel synthesis, or even the kilogram production of fine chemicals - flow processes are a helpful tool and a crucial link between differently scaled reactions. 

Most highly polar and ionic species are not amenable to processing with desirable solvents such as carbon dioxide or any other solvent such as water that has a higher critical temperature well above the decomposition temperature of many solutes. In such instances, the combination of the unique properties of supercritical fluids with those of micro-emulsions can be used to increase the range of applications of supercritical fluids. The resulting thermodynamically stable systems generally contain water, a surfactant and a supercritical fluid (as opposed to a non-polar liquid in liquid micro-emulsions). The possible supercritical fluids that could be used in these systems include carbon dioxide, ethylene, ethane, propane, propylene, n-butane, and n-pentane while many ionic and non-ionic surfactants can be used. The major difference between the liquid based emulsions and the supercritical ones is the effect of pressure. The pressure affects the miscibility gaps as well as the microstracture of the micro-emulsion phase. 

Flow processes offer potential advantages for the production of biobased materials and have been combined with numerous robust catalytic systems and alternative reaction media, including supercritical fluids and ionic liquids. 

It would appear that a simple equation of state, combined with insights from the field of molecular dynamics, can provide a good description of the thermodynamic behavior of supercritical molecular fluids. Only a comparatively small number of experimental measurements are necessary to supply missing parameters for most geologically important molecular species. However, there is a large gap in our knowledge of fluids in the two phase region and of mixtures of non-polar and ionic species. 

Only recently, chemists in industry as weU as in academia have begun to focus on the development of flow devices for laboratory use and hence for industrial apphcations by combining new chemical technologies with flow reactors [3]. These technologies include microwave assistance, the use of immobilized reagents and catalysts, and new fluids such as supercritical CO2 and ionic Uquids. 

---