Internal chromatograms

Internal Chromatogram and Elution Curve of Aerosol Spike... 

In the isothermal chromatography (IC) experiments, one usually measures elution curves - the time-dependent relative concentration of each of the analytes in carrier gas at the column exit. In principle, one could also fix the internal chromatogram (e.g., by rapid cooling of the column well below the working temperature) actually, it is impractical except for the compounds of similar volatility. In the ther-mochromatographic (TC) separations of mixtures of differently volatile tracers, given a proper stationary temperature profile, each of the components finally comes to practical rest somewhere within the column. The temperature gradient g may... 

If za is substituted by the IC column length /c, the equation yields the net retention time in the column. We again stress that we discuss the internal chromatograms rather than the elution curves, unless stated otherwise. It means that now the total retention time equals the duration of the experiment. The latter is preset by the experimenter, thus characterizing experimental conditions rather than the results. Therefore, we need to know how za depends on rather than vice versa, and a more logical form of Eq. 4.1 would be ... 

A concrete example comes from the experimental works with the radionuclides characterized by lx, much shorter than t c. A long continuous on-line experiment formally looks like the frontal chromatography of the products. However, when the decay events of such nuclides are registered immediately by the material of the column, the resulting internal chromatogram is the same as it would be in the elution regime. The random processing time tf equals the random individual lifetime of the nucleus. 

Figure 11.4 Chromatograms of plasma samples on a silica-chiralcel OJ coupled column system (a) plasma spiked with oxprenolol (internal standard) (b) plasma spiked with 040 p-g/ml metyrapone and 0.39 p-g/ml metyrapol (racemate) (c) plasma sample obtained after oral administration of 750 mg metaiypone. Peaks are as follows 1, metyrapone 2, metyrapol enantiomers 3, oxprenolol. Reprinted from Journal of Chromatography, 665, J. A. Chiarotto and I. W. Wainer, Determination of metyrapone and the enantiomers of its chfral metabolite metyrapol in human plasma and urine using coupled achfral-chfral liquid cltro-matography, pp. 147-154, copyright 1995, with permission from Elsevier Science.

Figure 11.5 Chromatograms of plasma samples obtained with fully automated on-line SPE-LC (a) dmg-ffee human plasma (b) human plasma spiked with omeprazole (100 ng/ml) and phenacetin (internal standard 1000 ng/ml). Reprinted from Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 21, G. Garcia-Encina et al., Validation of an automated liquid chromatograpliic method for omeprazole in human plasma using on-line solid-phase exti action, pp. 371 - 382, copyright 1999, with permission from Elsevier Science.

Standard addition. The sample is chromatographed before and after the addition of an accurately known amount of the pure component to be determined, and its weight in the sample is then derived from the ratio of its peak areas in the two chromatograms. Standard addition is particularly useful in the analysis of complex mixtures where it may be difficult to find an internal standard which meets the necessary requirements. 

Accurate quantitation in GC/MS requires the addition of a known quantity of an internal standard to an accurately weighed aliquot of the mixture (matrix) being analyzed. The internal standard corrects for losses during subsequent separation and concentration steps and provides a known amount of material to measure against the compound of interest. The best internal standard is one that is chemically similar to the compound to be measured, but that elutes in an empty space in the chromatogram. With MS, it is possible to work with isotopically labeled standards that co-elute with the component of interest, but are distinguished by the mass spectrometer. 

The use of an internal standard probably gives the most accurate quantitative results. However, the procedure depends upon finding an appropriate substance that will elute in a position on the chromatogram where it will not interfere or merge with any of the natural components of the mixture. If the sample contains numerous components, this may be difficult. Having identified a reference standard, the response factors for each component of interest in the mixture to be analyzed must be determined. A synthetic mixture is made up containing known concentrations of each of the components of interest and the standard. If there are (n) components, and the (r) component is present at concentration (Cr) and the standard at a concentration (Cst). 

Figure 5.67 Reconstructed ion chromatograms for Idoxifene and internal standard (ds-Idoxifene using LC-ToF-MS for (a) double-blank human plasma extract, (b) extract of blank human plasma containing internal standard (IS), and (c) control-blank human plasma spiked with Idoxifene at 5 gml , the LOQ of the method. Reprinted from 7. Chromatogr., B, 757, Comparison between liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and selected-reaction monitoring liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for quantitative determination of Idoxifene in human plasma , Zhang, H. and Henion, J., 151-159, Copyright (2001), with permission from Elsevier Science.

It is appropriate at this juncture to illustrate the power of chemiluminescence in an analytical assay by comparing the limits of sensitivity of the fluorescence-based and the chemllumlnescence-based detection for analytes in a biological matrix. The quantitation of norepinephrine and dopamine in urine samples will serve as an illustrative example. Dopamine, norepinephrine, and 3,4-dihydroxybenzy-lamine (an internal standard) were derivatized with NDA/CN, and chemiluminescence was used to monitor the chromatography and determine a calibration curve (Figure 15). The limits of detection were determined to be less than 1 fmol injected. A typical chromatogram is shown in Figure 16. 

An internal standard method gives more reliable results when elaborate sample preparation is required, as in extraction of a drug substance from biological fluids, or extraction of pesticides and herbicides from soil and plant matter. The addition of internal standard (IS) to the sample and standard acts as a marker to give accurate values of the recovery of the desired compound(s). Since the determination of wt% involves the ratio of the detector responses in the two chromatograms, the injection volume is not critical as in an external standard method. 

The improvements to the first three steps of scheme 1 were accomplished using GC as a major analytical tool. A capillary GC internal standard method, described above, was used to monitor the first three steps of scheme 1. Figure 10 is a typical chromatogram of the internal standard method for step 1 of scheme 1. To follow a reaction, a known amount of internal standard was added to the reaction vessel. Aliquots were withdrawn at intervals and analyzed on GC. A graph of yield vs. reaction time was prepared to determine the optimum time for completion of the reaction. 

Qualitative HPLC methods, using area percent, are used to monitor the disappearance of starting material and the formation of byproduct. Without the inclusion of an internal standard and the calculation of response factors, it is not possible to establish with certainty whether all of the starting material can be accounted for. An internal standard must be stable in the reaction mixture, must not co-elute with any of the components, and must be stable in the mobile phase. Ideally, the internal standard has a retention time about half that of the total analysis time. Internal standardization is extremely useful for kinetic studies. Added to the reaction vessel, samples that are withdrawn at various times will contain identical concentrations of internal standard, and chromatograms can be directly compared or adjusted to identical scales to correct for variation in injection volume. 

Under some conditions, it is difficult to incorporate an internal standard into a method. If the chromatogram is very complex, an internal standard may interfere with quantitation of a peak of interest. The development of highly precise sample transfer techniques, including modem autoinjectors, reduces the dependence of the experimentalist on the use of an internal standard to correct for effects of dilution and transfer losses. In many cases, external standardization can be used effectively. The weight percent purity is determined by comparing the area of each peak in a chromatogram with those generated by separately injected pure standards of known concentration. 

SEC-FTIR yields the average polymer structure as a function of molecular mass, but no information on the distribution of the chemical composition within a certain size fraction. SEC-FTIR is mainly used to provide information on MW, MWD, CCD, and functional groups for different applications and different materials, including polyolefins and polyolefin copolymers [703-705]. Quantitative methods have been developed [704]. Torabi et al. [705] have described a procedure for quantitative evaporative FUR detection for the evaluation of polymer composition across the SEC chromatogram, involving a post-SEC treatment, internal calibration and PLS prediction applied to the second derivative of the absorbance spectrum. 

Monarch epidermis. Peaks seen at 8.7, 10, and 82min are 3-hydroxy-10 -apo-P-carotenal, lutein, zeaxanthin, and P-carotene, respectively. The peak seen eluting at 22 min is the internal standard, monopropyl lutein ether, (b) The chromatogram obtained from an extract of the leaves of the milkweed plant. Peaks eluting prior to lutein are xanthophylls and epoxy xanthophylls, identified components include lutein, zeaxanthin, P-carotene, and its crT-isomer, eluting at 10, 11, 41, 77, and 79min, respectively. 

The structure of the specimen database is dictated by the fact that the specimen carousel in the chromatograph holds up to 16 samples. The set of analytical parameters associated with each specimen position includes the number of replicate injections, the volume of specimen for each injection, the flow rate of the eluting solvent, the duration of the chromatogram, the detector gain, and various timing parameters. A phantom zeroth specimen position is used to define the analytical parameters for injections not specifically programmed into the microprocessor. The operator must manually enter these parameters into the chromatograph s internal microprocessor in order to analyze the specimens in the carousel. 

The procedure is to inject 1.0 pL of each solution. The test is not valid unless, in the chromatogram obtained with reference solution, the resolution between the peaks corresponding to 2-(l-methylethyl) pentanoic acid and valproic acid is at least 2.0. In the chromatogram obtained with the test solution the sum of the areas of the peaks, apart form the principal peak, is not greater than three times the area of the peak due to the internal standard (3.0%) none of the peaks, apart from the principal peak, has an area greater than that of the peak due to the internal standard (0.1%). Disregard any peak with an area less than 0.1 times that of the peak due to the internal standard. 

Figure 8.4 Total ion current chromatograms of the (a) acidic and (b)neutral fractions of a sample collected from an amphora recovered in Fayum. DDA, didehydroabietic acid DA, dehydroabietic acid 70DA, 7 oxo dehydroabietic acid 70A, 7 oxo abietic acid 15Hy70DA, 15 hydroxy 7 oxo dehydroabietic acid 5HyDA, 15 hydroxy dehydroabietic acid R, retene MDA, methyl dehydroabietate. Slf internal standard, hexadecane IS2, internal standard, tridecanoic acid...

Figure 8.13 Total ion current chromatogram of the acidic fraction of the sample collected from the Roman Egyptian censer showing the presence of benzoe resin. ISlr internal standard, hexadecane IS2, internal standard, tridecanoic acid...

Figure 9.1 GC MS chromatograms acquired in the SIM mode of a laboratory blank (a) and an amino acid standard solution with concentrations at the quantitation limit (b). i.s.l, Hexadecane internal standard i.s.2, norleucine internal standard...

Figure 11 SCD chromatogram of catalytic cracked (FCC) gasoline, demonstrating the selectivity for sulfur compounds. (A) SCD response (B) FID response. (Reprinted from American Laboratory 23(3) 117, 1991. Copyright 1991 by International Scientific Communications, Inc.)...

FIGU RE 1.38 Chromatograms of LPME-treated drug-free plasma, mirtazapine enantiomers, and mefloquine.156 Chromatograms refer to drug-free plasma (A) plasma spiked with 62.5 ng mL-1 of (+)-(5)-mirtazapine (2) and (-)-(i )-mirtazapine (3) and 500 ng rnL-1 of (R, S)-mefloquine (1,4) (B) plasma sample from a patient treated with 15 mg/day of rac-mirtazapine (C). All samples were pre-treated by LPME. The analysis was performed on a Chiralpak AD column using hexane ethanol (98 2, v/v) plus 0.1% diethylamine at a flow rate of 1.5 mL min-1, A = 292 nm. (+)-(5)-mirtazapine (2), (-)-(f )-mirtazapine (3) and (1, 4) internal standard. (Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.)... 

FIGURE 1.43 Representative HPLC chromatograms of vitamin D metabolites.162 (A) late-eluting peaks (B) calibrator in extracted serum (C) sample from patient with low 25(OH)D3 treated with vitamin D2 (D) sample from patient with high concentrations of 25(OH)D3. Int. Std. = internal standard mAU = milliabsorbance units. (Reproduced with permission from the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.)... 

FIGURE 4.3 Total LC/MS ion chromatogram of an Abbott compound, the analog internal standard, its metabolites and impurities. Depending on the need to assay the polar metabolite, 23 to 50% of the mass chromatogram will not show useful information (arrows). 

FIGURE 4.4 Arrow indicates chromatograms from three injections of SC-50267 and an internal standard [D2]SC-50267. The last injection appears near the end of the display. A VG Trio-2 mass spectrometer equipped with a thermospray LC interface was used. Samples were injected every 1.85 min—the cycle time of the autosampler (Waters WISP). (Source Chang, M. and G. Schoenhard, presentation at Pittsburgh Conference and Exposition, 1993. With permission). 

---