INTERACTIONS IN SOLVENTS AND SOLUTIONS

Equation (8.49) accounts only for endothermic mixing. It is not too surprising that we are thus led to associate exothermic values with more specifically chemical interactions between solvent and solute as opposed to the purely physical interactions we have been describing in this approximation. 

In the case of nonionic but polar compounds such as sugars, the excellent solvent properties of water stem from its ability to readily form hydrogen bonds with the polar functional groups on these compounds, such as hydroxyls, amines, and carbonyls. These polar interactions between solvent and solute are stronger than the intermolecular attractions between solute molecules caused by van der Waals forces and weaker hydrogen bonding. Thus, the solute molecules readily dissolve in water. 

By a statistical model of a solution we mean a model which does not attempt to describe explicitly the nature of the interaction between solvent and solute species, but simply assumes some general characteristic for the interaction, and presents expressions for the thermodynamic functions of the solution in terms of an assumed interaction parameter. The quasi-chemical theory is of this type, and we have noted that a serious deficiency is its failure to consider the vibrational effects in the solution. It is of interest, therefore, to consider briefly the average-potential model which does include the effect of vibrations. 

The pore structure of most cross-linked polystyrene resins are the so called macro-reticular type which can be produced with almost any desired pore size, ranging from 20A to 5,000A. They exhibit strong dispersive type interaction with solvents and solutes with some polarizability arising from the aromatic nuclei in the polymer. Consequently the untreated resin is finding use as an alternative to the C8 and Cl8 reverse phase columns based on silica. Their use for the separation of peptide and proteins at both high and low pH is well established. 

The simplest discrete approach is the solvaton method 65) which calculates above all the electrostatic interaction between the molecule and the solvent. The solvent is represented by a Active molecule built up from so-called solvatones. The most sophisticated discrete model is the supermolecule approach 661 in which the solvent molecules are included in the quantum chemical calculation as individual molecules. Here, information about the structure of the solvent cage and about the specific interactions between solvent and solute can be obtained. But this approach is connected with a great effort, because a lot of optimizations of geometry with ab initio calculations should be completed 67). A very simple supermolecule (CH3+ + 2 solvent molecules) was calculated with a semiempirical method in Ref.15). 

Free diffusion of molecules in solution is characteristically a haphazard process with net directionality determined only by solute gradients and diffusion coefficients. Within cellular and extracellular spaces, however, diffusion can be strongly influenced by noncovalent interactions of solvent and solute molecules with membranes as well as the cellular and extracellular matrix. Channels and orifices can also alter the movement of solute and solvent molecules. These interactions can greatly alter the magnitude of the diffusion coefficient for a molecule from its isotropic value D in water to apparent diffusion coefficient D (which often can be directionally resolved into D, Dy, and D ). The parameter A, known as the tortuosity, equals DID y. In principle, A has X, y, and z components that need not be equal if there is any anisotropy in the local electrical fields or porosity of the matrix. 

The second term (E trostatic accounts for electrostatic interactions between solvent and solute (once the solute is placed in the cavity). 

There have been many attempts to assess solvent polarity in a more chemical way. The most important ways are described below. Chemical interactions between solvent and solute can lead to polarity. 

The characterization of a solvent by means of its polarity is an unsolved problem since the polarity itself has, until now, not been precisely defined. Polarity can be understood to mean (a) the permanent dipole moment of a compound, (b) its dielectric constant, or (c) the sum of all those molecular properties responsible for all the interaction forces between solvent and solute molecules (e.g., Coulombic, directional, inductive, dispersion, hydrogen bonding, and EPD/EPA interaction forces) (Kovats, 1968). The important thing concerning the so-called polarity of a solvent is its overall solvation ability. This in turn depends on the sum of all-specific as well as nonspecific interactions between solvent and solute. 

The osmotic pressure determination of molecular weights is based on the thermodynamic interaction of solvent and solute to lower die activity of the solvent. Experimentally, the solution is separated from the solvent by a semipermeable membrane. The solvent tends to pass through the membrane to dilute the solution and bring the activity of the solvent in both phases to equilibrium. The quantitative measurement of this tendency is obtained by allowing tile liquid solution to rise ill a vertical capillary connected to the solution compartment. The equilibrium height it achieves or the rate at which it rises can be measured. 

In general, continuum models perform very well wherever interactions between solvent and solute are only moderately strong, including for many nonpolar solvents as are frequently used in organometallic chemistry. They also work quite well for water, as a lot of effort has been invested in obtaining accurate solvent models for this important solvent. This allows the calculation of acid and base pA values with reasonable accuracy. 

First, one can truncate the system and ignore most of the atoms or treat them as a continuum. This method is applied most frequently, since in one sense it is used whenever reactions in solution are studied. As discussed in Section 10.2.3, this is a reasonable thing to do where the interactions between solvent and solute are relatively weak or can be treated in an average way. Likewise, reactions in big molecules or other large systems typically only involve directly a fairly small number of the atoms making up the system, so ignoring the rest of the atoms should not be too big an approximation. 

The assumption of forces of interaction between solvent and solute led to the century old principle that like dissolves like . In many cases the presence of similar functional groups in the molecules suffices. This rule of thumb has only limited validity since there are many examples of solutions of chemically dissimilar compounds. For example, for small molecules methanol and benzene, water and N,N-dimethylformamide, aniline and diethyl ether, and for macromolecules, polystyrene and chloroform, are completely miscible at room temperature. On the other hand, insolubility can occur in spite of similarity of the two partners. Thus, polyvinylal-cohol does not dissolve in ethanol, acetyl cellulose is insoluble in ethyl acetate, and polyacrylonitrile in acrylonitrile [12], Between these two extremes there is a whole range of possibilities where the two materials dissolve each other to a limited extent. 

Rather than the like dissolves like rule, it is the intermolecular interaction, between solvent and solute molecules, which determines the mutual solubility. A compound A dissolves in a solvent B only when the intermolecular forces of attraction Kaa and Kbb for the pure compounds can be overcome by the forces KAb in solution [13],... 

We now consider the second alternative, the concentrated solutions of polymers in solvents, where the concentration of solvent can be changed over a wide range. Here the polymer molecules will evenly distribute among the solvent molecules and a new set of interactions between solvent and solute molecules sets up, which results in a solvation structure. There are many interaction configurations, called solvation structures. Specification of solvation structures is very important in such disciplines as bioscience [75], pharmacy [76], and lavation [77], The polymer solvation structure has been the subject of studies in recent years. In the concept of polymer solvation, since the overall size of polymer also changes in solution, therefore, the solvation... 

The assumption of forces of interaction between solvent and solute led, on the other hand, to the century-old principle that like dissolves like (similia similibus sol-vuntur), where the word like should not be too narrowly interpreted. In many cases, the presence of similar functional groups in the molecules suffices. When a chemical... 

Even in the case of strong interactions between solvent and solute, the life time of each solvate is brief since there is continuous rotation or exchange of the solvent shell molecules. The time required for reorientation of hydrates in water is of the order 10 ... 10 " s at 25 °C [91]. If the exchange between bulk solvent molecules and those in the inner solvation shell of an ion is slower than the NMR time scale, then it is possible to observe two different resonance signals for the free and bound solvent. In this... 

The description of solvation of ions and molecules in solvent mixtures is even more complicated. Besides the interaction between solvent and solute, the interaction between unlike solvent molecules plays an important supplementary role. This leads to large... 

Interactions among solvent and solute molecules within the adsorbed monolayer, apart from interactions that are canceled by similar interactions in the mobile phase. 

We can express the above energy terms (Eja , E ) due to interactions among solvent and solute molecules in terms of activity coefficients -yy for each compound / in each phase / ... 

While Eqs. (11)-(13) are useful in understanding the general medium effects on reaction rates, their ability to quantitatively predict reaction rates will most likely suffer from inaccuracies similar to those experienced with solubility prediction in mixed solvents. Dielectric constant as a single parameter is not capable of quantitating all interactions among solvent and solute molecules. LePree and Connors reported on the use of a phenomenological approach to predict reaction rates in mixed solvents. The approach is similar to the solubility studies reported by Khossravi and Connors and uses complex equilibria to characterize solvent-solute interactions. 

---