Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solute and solvent interaction

Solvent and solute interactions with membrane material during microfiltration and ultrafiltration are then described and related to process performance, i.e. permeability and rejection. It is worth recalling that molecules in the colloidal range, roughly between one and one hundred nanometers, are separated by ultrafiltration, while microfiltration retains larger pcuticles. [Pg.570]

In his studies on fluorophenyl compounds [40] Taft has suggested that one needs a distant but sensitive observer removed from the confusion of the battlefield , that is the field of interactions of solvents, substituents and solutes. Such a remote observer who can see the complete view of solvent and solute interactions is not yet available. [Pg.236]

The conductor-like screening model (COSMO) is a continuum method designed to be fast and robust. This method uses a simpler, more approximate equation for the electrostatic interaction between the solvent and solute. Line the SMx methods, it is based on a solvent accessible surface. Because of this, COSMO calculations require less CPU time than PCM calculations and are less likely to fail to converge. COSMO can be used with a variety of semiempirical, ah initio, and DFT methods. There is also some loss of accuracy as a result of this approximation. [Pg.212]

The energy of interaction between a pair of solvent molecules, a pair of solute molecules, and a solvent-solute pair must be the same so that the criterion that = 0 is met. Such a mixing process is said to be athermal. The solvent and solute molecules must be the same size so that the criterion... [Pg.513]

Equation (8.49) accounts only for endothermic mixing. It is not too surprising that we are thus led to associate exothermic values with more specifically chemical interactions between solvent and solute as opposed to the purely physical interactions we have been describing in this approximation. [Pg.527]

In the case of nonionic but polar compounds such as sugars, the excellent solvent properties of water stem from its ability to readily form hydrogen bonds with the polar functional groups on these compounds, such as hydroxyls, amines, and carbonyls. These polar interactions between solvent and solute are stronger than the intermolecular attractions between solute molecules caused by van der Waals forces and weaker hydrogen bonding. Thus, the solute molecules readily dissolve in water. [Pg.38]

The Self-Consistent Reaction Field (SCRF) model considers the solvent as a uniform polarizable medium with a dielectric constant of s, with the solute M placed in a suitable shaped hole in the medium. Creation of a cavity in the medium costs energy, i.e. this is a destabilization, while dispersion interactions between the solvent and solute add a stabilization (this is roughly the van der Waals energy between solvent and solute). The electric charge distribution of M will furthermore polarize the medium (induce charge moments), which in turn acts back on the molecule, thereby producing an electrostatic stabilization. The solvation (free) energy may thus be written as... [Pg.393]

By a statistical model of a solution we mean a model which does not attempt to describe explicitly the nature of the interaction between solvent and solute species, but simply assumes some general characteristic for the interaction, and presents expressions for the thermodynamic functions of the solution in terms of an assumed interaction parameter. The quasi-chemical theory is of this type, and we have noted that a serious deficiency is its failure to consider the vibrational effects in the solution. It is of interest, therefore, to consider briefly the average-potential model which does include the effect of vibrations. [Pg.134]

In the previous chapter we considered a rather simple solvent model, treating each solvent molecule as a Langevin-type dipole. Although this model represents the key solvent effects, it is important to examine more realistic models that include explicitly all the solvent atoms. In principle, we should adopt a model where both the solvent and the solute atoms are treated quantum mechanically. Such a model, however, is entirely impractical for studying large molecules in solution. Furthermore, we are interested here in the effect of the solvent on the solute potential surface and not in quantum mechanical effects of the pure solvent. Fortunately, the contributions to the Born-Oppenheimer potential surface that describe the solvent-solvent and solute-solvent interactions can be approximated by some type of analytical potential functions (rather than by the actual solution of the Schrodinger equation for the entire solute-solvent system). For example, the simplest way to describe the potential surface of a collection of water molecules is to represent it as a sum of two-body interactions (the interac-... [Pg.74]

The most popular bonded phases are, without doubt, the reverse phases which consist solely of aliphatic hydrocarbon chains bonded to the silica. Reverse phases interact dispersively with solvent and solute molecules and, as a consequence, are employed with very polar solvents or aqueous solvent mixtures such as methanol/water and acetonitrile/water mixtures. The most commonly used reverse phase appears to be the brush type phase with aliphatic chains having four, eight or eighteen carbon atom chains attached. These types of reverse phase have been termed C4, C8 and Cl8 phases respectively. The C8... [Pg.76]

The Interaction of Reverse Phases with Solvents and Solutes... [Pg.77]

The pore structure of most cross-linked polystyrene resins are the so called macro-reticular type which can be produced with almost any desired pore size, ranging from 20A to 5,000A. They exhibit strong dispersive type interaction with solvents and solutes with some polarizability arising from the aromatic nuclei in the polymer. Consequently the untreated resin is finding use as an alternative to the C8 and Cl8 reverse phase columns based on silica. Their use for the separation of peptide and proteins at both high and low pH is well established. [Pg.85]

The simplest discrete approach is the solvaton method 65) which calculates above all the electrostatic interaction between the molecule and the solvent. The solvent is represented by a Active molecule built up from so-called solvatones. The most sophisticated discrete model is the supermolecule approach 661 in which the solvent molecules are included in the quantum chemical calculation as individual molecules. Here, information about the structure of the solvent cage and about the specific interactions between solvent and solute can be obtained. But this approach is connected with a great effort, because a lot of optimizations of geometry with ab initio calculations should be completed 67). A very simple supermolecule (CH3+ + 2 solvent molecules) was calculated with a semiempirical method in Ref.15). [Pg.188]

One substance dissolves In another If the forces of attraction between the solute and the solvent are similar to the solvent-solvent and solute-solute Interactions. This generalization can be applied to a variety of solution types. [Pg.835]

In general, solubility depends on the relative magnitudes of three pairs of interactions, namely solute-solute, solvent-solvent and solute-solvent (Robb, 1983). For a substance to be soluble in a given liquid, the solute-solvent interactions must be greater than or equal to the other two interactions. [Pg.40]

Dipole-dipole forces, the so-called Keesom forces 8ind8o> appear when both the solvent and solute have dipole moments. Strong interactions are produced as a result of dipole alignment. Dipole interactions are determined by the sum of all the dipoles within a molecule. [Pg.69]

The concept of selectivity parameters has a physicochemical relevance, and it is proved experimentally that among solvents with similar functionality there is a great similarity with the selectivity parameters [42]. This fact is very important at the molecular level of the phenomena, and it is the best proof of the predominant role of functionality in intermolecular interactions of the solvent and solute, and the solvent and stationary phase. [Pg.80]

The very high resolution for the ESR spectrum of cob(II)alamin in the enzyme system is undoubtedly due to the fact that all the coenzyme molecules are bound in an identical environment at the enzyme active site. This results in a homogeneous cobalt-benzimidazole geometry, because both identical binding sites, solvent, and solute molecules can no longer approach the Bia-molecule closely. In addition, the enzyme bound cob(II)alamin molecules are more isolated from one another and thus relaxation due to spin-spin interactions is less effective in broadening spectral lines. [Pg.72]

The largest increase in experimental measurements on aqueous solutions has been in those designed to furnish information on molecular interactions and order. These techniques, along with the kinds of information which can be derived from them, are outlined in Figure 5. Although the principles behind all these techniques have been known for many years, advances in instrumentation and in data collection have encouraged their widespread application to solutions of all kinds. The use of mass spectrometry to study interactions between isolated solvent and solute molecules has been perfected largely within the past ten years. This topic is reviewed in reference (113). [Pg.476]

Association and mobilities are related in a complex way to the bulk properties of the solvent and solute. These properties include the charge density and distribution on the ions and the Lewis base properties, the strength and nature of the solvent molecule dipole, the hydrogen-bonding capability, and the intermolecular structure of the solvent. Some correlations can be made on the basis of mobility and association trends in series such as the halides and alkali metals within a single solvent others can be drawn between solvents for a given ion. It appears that conductance measurements provide a clear measure of the sum of ion-solvent interactions, but that other techniques must be used in conjunction with conductance if assessments of individual contributions from specific factors are to be made. [Pg.57]

One may consider a series of physical states ranging from the crystalline, where molecular aggregation and orientation are large, to the dilute gaseous state, where there are no significant orientational limits. States of intermediate order are represented by micelles, liquid crystals, monolayers, ion pairs, and dipole-dipole complexes. In the crystalline state, the differences between pure enantiomers, racemic modifications, and diastereomeric complexes are clearly defined both structurally and energetically (32,33). At the other extreme, stereospecific interactions between diastereomerically related solvents and solutes, ion pairs, and other partially oriented systems are much less clearly resolved. [Pg.198]

Leal-Calderon et al. [13] have proposed some basic ideas that control the colloidal interactions induced by solvent or a mixture of solvent and solute, when varying their length from molecular to colloidal scale. They have investigated the behavior of water- and glycerol-in oil emulsions in the presence of linear flexible chains of various masses. Figure 3.7 shows the phase behavior of both water and glycerol droplets of diameter 0.4 pm when dispersed in a linear aliphatic solvent of formula C H2 +2, from n = 5 to n = 30. Because, for n larger than 16, solvent crystallization occurs at room temperature, a second series of experiments... [Pg.114]


See other pages where Solute and solvent interaction is mentioned: [Pg.165]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.600]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.600]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.693]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.783]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.302]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.809 ]




SEARCH



INTERACTIONS IN SOLVENTS AND SOLUTIONS

Interaction between solute and solvent

Solute-solvent interactions

Solutions solvent and solute

Solutions solvents

Solvents, interactive

Specific Solute-Solvent Interactions and Proton Transfer Reactions

Theories Regarding Interaction Between Solvent and Solute

© 2024 chempedia.info