Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interaction Compensation

In Chapter 12 we proposed a particular control-loop stmeture that incorporates overrides and antireset windup. It also accommodates feedforward compensation and advanced control techniques without interfering with either normal reset or antireset windup. We also suggested that decouplers could be designed to compensate for interactions in e same way that feedforward compensators are designed. The technique here leads to stable, noninteracting control, but not necessarily to optimum control. Modem control theory, with its more sophisticated approaches to multivariable control, sometimes reqtiires some interaction for optimality. [Pg.468]

Note that the feedback controller, KcrGcri ), is shown as a PI controller with external reset feedback. [Pg.468]

The decoupler for canceling the effea of bottom composition controller output changes on top composition has the transfer function  [Pg.468]

Note that the impulse function time constants are the same as the reset time constants of the loops to which the decouplers are coimected. [Pg.468]

Partial signal flow diagram for system with reflux manipulated by reflux drum level [Pg.469]


The principle of the liquid chromatography under critical conditions (LC CC) was elucidated in Section 16.3.3. The mutual compensation of the exclusion—entropy and the interaction—enthalpy-based retention of macromolecules can be attained when applying in the controlled way the interactions that lead to either adsorption or enthalpic partition. The resulting methods are called LC at the critical adsorption point (LC CAP) or LC at the critical partition point (LC CPP), respectively. The term LC at the point of exclusion-adsorption transition (LC PEAT) was also proposed for the procedures employing compensation of exclusion and adsorption [161]. It is anticipated that also other kinds of enthalpic interactions, for example the ion interactions between column packing and macromolecules can be utilized for the exclusion-interaction compensation. [Pg.478]

The use of templates that can nucleate secondary structures has also been studied [23], The fundamental idea is to attach one or more conformationally flexible peptides to a rigid template that is designed to initiate either a /f-sheet or an a-helix by forming the first crucial hydrogen bonds. These interactions compensate for the loss of entropy associated with the folding process and in particular in the initiation step. This strategy has been used to develop stable helices, sheets, and artificial proteins. [Pg.13]

For most vapor-phase complexes of type (6) the Coulomb interaction compensates only part of the proton transfer energy AE and we expect to find neutral type complexes (NC). The only candidates for ionic complexes (IC) or intermediate cases are the associations of strong bases with strong acids, e.g. the complexes between ammonia or aliphatic amines and HC1, HBr or HJ (Table 1). [Pg.6]

Note that the extensive HB network is compromised near both the hydrophilic and the hydrophobic surfaces, but differently. In the case of the hydrophilic surface, the enthalpic gain from the water-surface interaction compensates for the twin losses of enthalpy and the entropy of water arising from the molecular rearrangement imposed by the surface. However, for a hydrophobic surface, such a compensation is not present. Therefore, the chemical potential of a water molecule near a hydrophobic surface is higher than that in a bulk. [Pg.207]

At low temperature the curve of pV vs. p for gases has a minimum. At higher temperature the Boyle temperature, the point of zero slope occurs at p = 0. At this point the effect of the excluded volume of the gas is compensated by the interaction. This is similar to the d-temper-ature of polymer solutions (interaction compensates excluded volume). [Pg.36]

Equation 1.44 is a reasonably smooth function, which is an indication that dispersion interactions compensate each other to a significant extent, even when there is a large difference in the nature of the contacting phases. For example, if both Aj and A2 are around 10 ° J and differ from each other by, for example, 20%, then A 10 J for a 5% difference. A 2.5 x 10 J, and for a 2% difference between A, and A2, A is lowered to 10 J. We will use these estimates later in the characterization of the contact interactions in lyophilic and lyophobic systems. [Pg.32]

As explained previously, the Rg of polymer chains in organic solvents depends on the sign and magnitude of the interactions between the chain segments and the molecules of the surrounding liquid. The attractive and repulsive interactions compensate at the theta temperature Tq), at which = 0, and Rg corresponds to the dimension of a volume-less polymer coil. Similarly, as the concentration of polymer increases, excluded-volume effects are screened and diminished, and, in the limit of the bulk polymer, the conformation of a single chain can be described as an unperturbed random walk, as originally predicted by Flory [11], and one of the first applications of SANS was to confirm this prediction for the condensed amorphous state (see Section 7.1.2). [Pg.491]

In cyclic amines, such as the protonated form of 3-fluoro-A -methyl-piperidine (21), these interactions provide significant conformational bias [53-55]. In 21, the ring F atom strongly prefers an axial disposition despite experiencing steric compression, with the calculated conformer populations provided in Fig. 6 [55]. As the global minimum, conformer A dominates to the extent of 95-96 %, stabilized by an electrostatic interaction between the F and NH+ moieties, whilst conformer D contributes 4-5 % at equilibrium with the unfavorable diaxial interactions compensated by a productive electrostatic effect. [Pg.12]

Use interaction compensators (decouplers). If two control loops, such as top and bottom temperature controls on a distillation column, interact, we can eliminate the interactions by installing two compensators. One compensates for the action of the top temperamre controller on the bottom loop while the other compensates for the action of the bottom temperamre control loop on the top one. This is discussed in Chapter 20. [Pg.17]

Feedforward and interaction compensation without interfering with either normal reset or anti reset-windup... [Pg.299]

The theory and mathematics involved in combining feedforward con jensation, overrides, controllers (PI and PID), and anti reset-windup have been covered in detail elsewhere and are reviewed briefly below. At this point we wish to point out that (1) the feedforward function, KgTffSl TffS + 1), commonly termed impulse feedforward, is a convenient way of feeding fc>rward without interfering with reset when external reset feedback is used, and (2) making the feedforward time constant, t, equal to the reset time constant, Tji, is usually desirable. This approach to feedforward also provides a convenient way to connect interaction compensators (decouplers) into control loops. [Pg.301]

Shunta compares the results with and without sampled-data interaction compensators for controlling both ends of a 20-tray distillation column. Figures 21.7a and 21.7b show the closed-loop responses of composition on trays 2 and 18 for set-point changes and Figures 21.7c and 21.7d for a 10 percent change in feed composition. Tlie improvement in control with interaction compensators is sign cant. [Pg.510]

Stronger adsorption due to the adhesive interaction of the polar group, thus the novel carboxyhc add ammonium salt has a lower and more stable friction coefficient. Suffident length and symmetry of the hydrocarbon chain cause the extensive cohesive interactions, and these dispersive interactions compensate for the friction reduction. [Pg.441]


See other pages where Interaction Compensation is mentioned: [Pg.99]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.3272]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.342]   


SEARCH



Drug-receptor interactions enthalpy/entropy compensation

Enthalpy-entropy compensation weak interaction

© 2024 chempedia.info