Controlled multivariate

As a result, there has been a lot of research activity in multivariable control, both in academia and in industry. Some practical, useful tools have been developed to design control systems for these multivariable processes. The second edition includes a fairly comprehensive discussion of what 1 feel are the useful techniques for controlling multivariable processes. 

QA, quality attributes SPC/MSPC, statistical process control/multivariate statistical process control CPPs, critical process parameters. 

Implementation of MPC For a new MPC application, a cost/benefit analysis is usually performed prior to project approval. Then the steps involved in the implementation of MPC can be summarized as follows (Hokanson and Gerstle, Dynamic Matrix Control Multivariable Controllers, in Practical Distillation Control, Luyben (ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1992, p. 248 Qin and Badg-well, Control Ene. Practice, 11 773, 2003). 

Controlled multivariate experiments are the most logical, the most scientific, and the most efficient way that scientists know to collect data. Controlled experiments are the scientific... 

If the loop interactions are not severe, then each single-loop controller can be designed using the techniques described earlier in this section. However, the presence of strong interactions requires that the controllers be detuned to reduce oscillations. A better approach is to utilize multivariable control techniques, such as model predictive control. Multivariable control is often used in distillation towers as well as in refinery operations such as cracking or reforming. 

Isermann, R. Digital Control Systems. Springer-Verlag, Vol. 1 Fundamentals, Deterministic Control 2nd rev. ed. (1989) Vol. 2 Stochastic Control, Adaptive Control Multivariable Control, Adaptive Control, Applications 2nd rev. ed. (1991)... 

Garcia, C.E. Morari, M. Internal Model Control - Multivariable Control Law Computation and Tuning. Industrial Engineering Chemical Process Design and Development, 24 (1985), pp. 484-494... 

Multivariable control strategies utilize multiple input—multiple output (MIMO) controUers that group the interacting manipulated and controlled variables as an entity. Using a matrix representation, the relationship between the deviations in the n controlled variable setpoints and thek current values,, and the n controUer outputs, is... 

While the single-loop PID controller is satisfactoiy in many process apphcations, it does not perform well for processes with slow dynamics, time delays, frequent disturbances, or multivariable interactions. We discuss several advanced control methods hereafter that can be implemented via computer control, namely feedforward control, cascade control, time-delay compensation, selective and override control, adaptive control, fuzzy logic control, and statistical process control. 

Three examples of simple multivariable control problems are shown in Fig. 8-40. The in-line blending system blends pure components A and B to produce a product stream with flow rate w and mass fraction of A, x. Adjusting either inlet flow rate or Wg affects both of the controlled variables andi. For the pH neutrahzation process in Figure 8-40(Z ), liquid level h and the pH of the exit stream are to be controlled by adjusting the acid and base flow rates and w>b. Each of the manipulated variables affects both of the controlled variables. Thus, both the blending system and the pH neutralization process are said to exhibit strong process interacHons. In contrast, the process interactions for the gas-liquid separator in Fig. 8-40(c) are not as strong because one manipulated variable, liquid flow rate L, has only a small and indirec t effect on one controlled variable, pressure P. 

Control Strategies for Multivariable Control Problems If a conventional multiloop control strategy performs poorly due to control loop interactions, a number of solutions are available ... 

Use a decouphng control system d. Use a multivariable control scheme (e.g., model predictive control)... 

The current widespread interest in MFC techniques was initiated by pioneering research performed by two industrial groups in the 1970s. Shell Oil (Houston, TX) reported their Dynamic Matrix Control (DMC) approach in 1979, while a similar technique, marketed as IDCOM, was published by a small French company, ADERSA, in 1978. Since then, there have been over one thousand applications of these and related MFC techniques in oil refineries and petrochemical plants around the world. Thus, MFC has had a substantial impact and is currently the method of choice for difficult multivariable control problems in these industries. However, relatively few applications have been reported in other process industries, even though MFC is a veiy general approach that is not limited to a particular industiy. 

The MPC control problem illustrated in Eqs. (8-66) to (8-71) contains a variety of design parameters model horizon N, prediction horizon p, control horizon m, weighting factors Wj, move suppression factor 6, the constraint limits Bj, Q, and Dj, and the sampling period At. Some of these parameters can be used to tune the MPC strategy, notably the move suppression faclor 6, but details remain largely proprietary. One commercial controller, Honeywell s RMPCT (Robust Multivariable Predictive Control Technology), provides default tuning parameters based on the dynamic process model and the model uncertainty. 

One important class of nonlinear programming techniques is called quadratic programming (QP), where the objective function is quadratic and the constraints are hnear. While the solution is iterative, it can be obtained qmckly as in linear programming. This is the basis for the newest type of constrained multivariable control algorithms called model predic tive control. The dominant method used in the refining industiy utilizes the solution of a QP and is called dynamic matrix con-... 

A solvent free, fast and environmentally friendly near infrared-based methodology was developed for the determination and quality control of 11 pesticides in commercially available formulations. This methodology was based on the direct measurement of the diffuse reflectance spectra of solid samples inside glass vials and a multivariate calibration model to determine the active principle concentration in agrochemicals. The proposed PLS model was made using 11 known commercial and 22 doped samples (11 under and 11 over dosed) for calibration and 22 different formulations as the validation set. For Buprofezin, Chlorsulfuron, Cyromazine, Daminozide, Diuron and Iprodione determination, the information in the spectral range between 1618 and 2630 nm of the reflectance spectra was employed. On the other hand, for Bensulfuron, Fenoxycarb, Metalaxyl, Procymidone and Tricyclazole determination, the first order derivative spectra in the range between 1618 and 2630 nm was used. In both cases, a linear remove correction was applied. Mean accuracy errors between 0.5 and 3.1% were obtained for the validation set. 

To get good control of the entire PRT, not only should the expander be controlled, but a completely integrated control system for this application should be designed. Most conventional control systems consist of individual control loops that only consider their specific tasks. The PRT—from a control perspective—is a multivariable system that requires integration between the different control loops. Further, some of the disturbances on the PRT are so fast that closed-loop control is too slow to keep the train under control. 

The concepts of controllability and observability were introduced by Kalman (1960) and play an important role in the control of multivariable systems. 

---