Instructional Systems Design model

The question to answer for this pre-startup task is Who needs training for this process and to what level of detail One method to analyze training needs is offered by the Instructional Systems Design (ISD) technical training model. It points to the job task analysis method mentioned previously (Appendix D, ISD Model and Job Task Analysis Techniques) to identify procedure titles as a first step for determining which job positions require specific knowledge and skills. 

The analysis phase of the instructional systems design (ISD) model, as referred to in Chapter 4, consists of a job task analysis based upon the equipment, operations, tools, and materials to be used as well as the knowledge and skills required for each position. Most important in this phase is the selection of the performance and learning objectives each employee must master to be successful in their job as related to the toll. 

The molar fluxes appear in engineering design models. One of the main objectives of this text is to consider ways in which these fluxes may be calculated from a knowledge of the hydrodynamics and transport properties of the system. The boundary conditions (Eq. 1.3.13), or the simplified versions (Eqs. 1.3.14 and 1.3.15), are well known to chemical engineers (see, e.g., the book by Bird et al., 1960), but it is instructive to follow the general derivations of these relations [see Standart (1964) and Slattery (1981)]. 

Theories of instructional design do not suffice they must be supplemented with knowledge from other sources, such as studies concerning the implementation and evaluation of instruction. The knowledge of human experts, including experienced teachers, must be tapped. Consider the development of an expert system to do oil-well analysis although there exist models upon which the system can be based, the models are not sufficiently detailed to map out all situations, possible variations, etc. Input from human experts is also required. The task of developing an instructional system is no less complicated. Instruction is a complex domain, in which it is difficult to determine the relevant factors, let alone assess them. 

During RO system design, it is frequently helpful to be able to investigate the effect of multiple combinations of a few factors. For instance, it is instructive to model the RO system at high temperature and a low flow factor to. simulate challenging operating conditions. Instead of defining... 

Biphasic hydroformylation is a typical and complicated gas-liquid-liquid reaction. Although extensive studies on catalysts, ligands, and catalytic product distributions have appeared, the reaction mechanism has not been understood sufficiently and even contradictory concepts of the site of hydroformylation reaction were developed [11, 13, 20]. Studies on the kinetics of hydroformylation of olefins are not only instructive for improvement of the catalytic complexes and ligands but also provide the basic information for design and scale-up of novel commercial reactors. The kinetics of hydroformylation of different olefins, such as ethylene, propylene, 1-hexene, 1-octene, and 1-dodecene, using homogeneous or supported catalysts has been reported in the literature. However, the results on the kinetics of hydroformylation in aqueous biphasic systems are rather limited and up to now no universally accepted intrinsic biphasic kinetic model has been derived, because of the unelucidated reaction mechanism and complicated effects of multiphase mass transfer (see also Section 2.4.1.1.2). 

For a discussion of the systems approach to training, we briefly review the Branson et al. (1975) ISD model. This model is possibly the most widely used and comprehensive method of training development. It has been in existence for over 20 years and has revolutionized the design of instruction in many nulitary and civilian contexts. The evolutionary premises behind the model are that performance objectives are developed to address specific behavioral events (identified by task analyses), that criterion tests are developed to address the training objectives, and that training is essentially developed to teach students to pass the tests and thus achieve the requisite criteria. 

The SE methods give instructions to apply the SE processes, as they define the kind of artefacts needed during each phase and how to relate them. Most of these methods now are MBSE methods (Estefan 2008) in contrast with Docinnent-Based approach. These methods support the analysis, specification, design and verification of systems with the exploitation of a centrahzed model. Using an MBSE method offers important benefits summarized in (Friedenthal et al. 2008) ... 

---