Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Influencing factors yield determination

The authors found that the yield of 30-mer (a product with 5—6 linkages) was not much smaller than that of 10-mer or 12-mer. These facts indicate that the stability of the complex between the oligonucleotides and the complementary template is the most important factor in determining the extent of the condensation. The strong influences of template polymer (Poly C) are demonstrated in Fig. 9, in which the elution profile is shown of the polymerization products of (2 MeIp)6 in the presence of Poly C (B) and in their absence (A). [Pg.152]

So far we have seen that ionization creates a hole and ejects and electron. In DNA the electron is captured exclusively by the pyrimidine bases while the holes are distributed between guanine and the deoxyribose. The next problem to solve is to determine the free radical yield in DNA and to correlate this yield with the yield of strand breaks. These are very challenging experiments since there are so many factors influencing radicals yield. [Pg.517]

The objective of this study was to determine the lipid extraction yields from two species of microalgae by SC CO2, and to investigate the factors that influence these yields. [Pg.450]

Novel vinyl liquid crystalline (l.c.) polymers were synthesized with the UV-sensitive p-methoxycinnamate chromophore incorporated into the side chain of the polymers. The objective of this synthesis was to determine if a molecularly organized environment could influence the yield of a chemical reaction in the solid state. The investigation into the photochemical and physical processes of these thin films revealed that the photodimerization of the p-methoxycinnamate moieties was very sensitive to their geometrical arrangement in the polymer matrix. The relative quantum yield of cyclobutane formation increased by a factor of approximately 8 for the l.c. p-methoxycinnamate film compared to its amorphous analog. This quantum yield approaches the theoretical limit for this system. [Pg.144]

Species differ quantitatively and qualitatively in their response to anti-ChEs, This is evident in variable doses that cause death in 50% of a test population (LD50) (Table 1) as well as the levels that yield no effect (NOEL), no adverse effect (NOAEL), the lowest level an effect is observed (LOEL), and the lowest level an adverse effect is observed (LOAEL). To adequately compare OP effects across species, the route and duration of exposure should be similar since absorption and distribution are influenced by the route of administration. These are key factors in determining the body burden of the compound. Moreover, similar end points must be compared across spede.s [e.g, LDjg, the effective dose for 50% (ED50) AChE inhibition in blood or brain, cholinergic receptor binding, or behavioral tests]. [Pg.145]

Using the comparative methodology discussed above, we will in the following present some results based on data which were collected with the help of national experts in each of the EU member States as well as in Norway, Switzerland and the Czech Republic. The financial performance of the farms is assessed using the indicators profits per ha and profits per family work unit in combination with important factors which determine profitability, e.g. yield levels and prices realised and support payments received. Most of the studies analysed are based on approach 3. In some cases, the selection of an adequate reference group was, in our opinion, not completely successfixl. Since the selection of the reference system has a large influence on results, the findings of the respective studies have to be interpreted with due care. [Pg.143]

What must now be determined are the regression coefficients oq, II],. .., a and the residual variations cr. Factor analysis is helpful in discovering, in a group of parallel observation series, common influence factors which, for the moment, are not explicitly determined and measured. Analogous to regression analysis, this representation yields the following equation ... [Pg.34]

No rule exists in the relationship of the absolute intensity (i.e., counts) of a molecular ion as determined by ESI-MS with the concentration in solution of the analyte that yields the ion. The ion intensity of an analyte determined by ESI-MS could be affected by many factors related to sample preparation, ionization conditions, tuning conditions, the analyzer and detector used in the mass spectrometer, etc. Minor changes of these factors could lead to significant changes of ion intensity from one state to another. As MS instruments become more and more sensitive, the influences of these factors on determination of ion intensities by ESI-MS become more and more evident. Thus, it would be difficult for scientists to virtually repeat a measurement of absolute ion counts for an analyte in a biological sample from time to time, from an instiument to another instrument, or from one laboratory to the others. [Pg.292]

The first report of the use of N-acyl oxazolidinones in asymmetric alkylation was by Evans et al. in 1982. The reactions described were found to proceed with high levels of diastereoselectivity and with very good yields (Table 7.2). The primary factor in determining the stereochemical course of the reaction is the geometry of the enolate intermediate. Studies have shown the level of /Z-enolate control transfers directly to the level of diastereoselectivity of the alkylated product. Conveniently, it has also been established that the use of bulky bases (e.g., EDA and NaHMDS) for the deprotonation of A-acyl oxazolidinones strongly favors formation of the Z-(0)-enolate. Another factor influencing the stereochemical course of the reaction is the nature of the auxiliary itself. In particular, the ability of the... [Pg.201]


See other pages where Influencing factors yield determination is mentioned: [Pg.23]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.972]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.580]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.634]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.4356]    [Pg.2025]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.4355]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.1064]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.24]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.445 , Pg.448 , Pg.449 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.445 , Pg.448 , Pg.449 ]




SEARCH



Determinant factor

Determining Influencing Factors

Factors determining

Factors influencing determination

Treatments to determine factors influencing product yield

Yield factor

Yield factors influencing

© 2024 chempedia.info