Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Impact ionization parameter

This expression reproduces the experimentally measured ionization efficiency curves surprisingly well, considering the simplicity of the model on which it is based. There is a discontinuity in the function at the maximum (when X = Xmax) but this affects only a small region of the ionization efficiency curve, and satisfactory values of the cross section are still obtained over this region. A great advantage of this method is that it is very simple to apply, depending on only three parameters the molecular polarizability volume, the ionization potential, and the maximum electron impact ionization cross section. These can be measured or calculated values (from the ab initio EM method described above, for example). [Pg.338]

Agilent GC-MS ChemStation System equipped with capillary gas chromatograph HP 5972,5973, or 6890 series Agilent 6890 series autosampler. The GC-MS system is operated in the positive-ion, electron-impact ionization mode. Chromatographic parameters of the acquisition method are listed in Table 3.1.7. TIC is recorded over the mass range m/z 50-550, and the total run time is 33 min. [Pg.148]

Bell et al. [33] proposed an analytical formula, widely known in the literature as the Belfast ionization (BELI) formula [34] that contains the dipole interaction term for the electron-impact ionization of atoms and ions. It has been applied to light atomic and ionic targets with species-dependent parameters. Godunov and Ivanov [34] applied the BELI formula to the El ionization of Ne 1 ions. Here also no generality as to parameters of the formula was provided regarding the species-dependent parameters. Moreover, the BELI formula does not make any allowance for relativistic effects. Haque et al. [35-38] have proposed a modification of this BELI model for evaluating the El K-, L-, and M-shell ionization cross sections of atoms. The relativistic and ionic effects are also incorporated in their modified BELI (MBELL) [35-38] model in addition to generalizing the species-independent... [Pg.319]

Information for acertain parameter not available, if not given, na, not available DI, deionized water Cl, chemical ionization BCD, electron capture detector El, electron impact ionization FID, flame ionization detector MS, mass spectrometer MtBE, methyl tert-butylether MTBSTE, n-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-Wmethylfluoracetamide PDAM, 1-pyrenyldiazomethane PFBBr, pentafluorobenzyl bromide PEBOH, pentafluorobenzyl alcohol SPME, solid-phase microextraction TOPO, tri-n-octylphoshine oxide UASB, upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. [Pg.479]

Improvements in experimental technique and analysis will no doubt continue to be made with most emphasis on valence band spectra, and perhaps involving the measurement of other parameters simultaneously with ionization energies. For example, electron impact ionization experiments on gas molecules with determination of the kinematics of incident and emitted electrons can provide information on electron binding energies and on the momentum distribution of valence electrons,< > allowing a very severe test of theoretical descriptions. [Pg.190]

The equation of motion (9.49) is known as Mathieu s differential equation. It has stable solutions only for certain values of the parameters a and b [1221]. Charged particles that enter the trap from outside cannot be trapped. Therefore, the ions have to be produced inside the trap. This is generally achieved by electron-impact ionization of neutral atoms. [Pg.525]

An important performance parameter of an optical detector at a given wavelength is the external quantum efficiency It is defined as the ratio of the number of electrons generated to the number of incident photons before any photogain occurs. Here rj takes into account the surface reflection loss and other losses in the detector. In general, rj depends on the absorptivity of the materials and the dimensions of the absorption region. The photogain M can result from carrier injection in semiconductor materials, as in the case of photoconductive devices (see Sec. 9.4.3), or from impact ionization, as in the case of avalanche photodiodes (see Sec. 9.4.2). [Pg.964]

All this together with the newly calculated thermod)mamic functions of gaseous compounds required the development of procedures for evaluating the reliability of the complete set of thermod)mamic parameters. The selected approach involves calculation of the atomization and/or sublimation enthalpy under standard conditions from the vapor pressure measurements. The same values are calculated from the data found by other independent methods (electron-impact ionization, measurement of gas-phase equilibria). The convergence of values found in various ways... [Pg.174]

A solid or liquid dielectric inserted between two electrodes can support only a limited voltage. Several physical mechanisms can lead to a current instability and to breakdown, e.g., thermal instabilities in materials with thermally activated conductivities, transitions from trap-controlled transport to band transport, impact ionization, etc. (Zeller, 1987). Which one of the different mechanisms ultimately determines the dielectric strength depends on materials parameters, geometry, voltage pulse forms (including history), temperature, etc. (O Dwyer, 1973). [Pg.455]

Figure 16 Ionization of water vapor by 150-keV H° particles. The e and H° impact data are from Refs. 38 and 67, and the parameters for the Rudd model are from Ref. 36. The dotted line is discussed in the text under the section on effective charge. Figure 16 Ionization of water vapor by 150-keV H° particles. The e and H° impact data are from Refs. 38 and 67, and the parameters for the Rudd model are from Ref. 36. The dotted line is discussed in the text under the section on effective charge.
Secondly, the cross section reflects the nature of the dependence of the partial widths on the intermolecular distance R. As expected from Eq. (20), is small for large R and increases gradually with decrease in R. On the other hand, Fgx in its empirical form (Eq. (17)) is extremely small at large distances and increases sharply near the repulsive wall. Therefore, the de-excitation probability due to Penning ionization is determined by the dipole-dipole part of the decay width in collisions with large impact parameter, whereas the probability for Penning ionization is already almost unity by the single contribution... [Pg.144]


See other pages where Impact ionization parameter is mentioned: [Pg.1432]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.1432]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.694]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.324]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.374 , Pg.375 , Pg.376 ]




SEARCH



Impact ionization

Impaction parameter

Ionization parameter

© 2024 chempedia.info