Ideal electrolyte ionic liquids

Kawano R, Nazeeruddin MK, Sato A et al (2007) AmphiphUic ruthenium dye as an ideal sensitizer in conversion of fight to electricity using ionic liquid crystal electrolyte. Electrochem Commun 9 1134-1138... 

In this chapter we will describe some of the non-ideal properties of solids, and the set of Margules equations commonly used for solid solutions. However, although solid solutions have been the main area of application of the Margules equations in the Earth Sciences to date, they work equally well for non-ionic liquid and gaseous solutions. Aqueous electrolyte solutions are sufficiently different that we will give them a later chapter of their own (Chapter 17). 

Fig. 4 shows the example of cyclic voltammetiy curves for an activated carbon at 5 mV s" using different electrolyte (aqueous, organic, ionic liquid), where it is well visible that the voltage range is imposed by the stability vrfndow of the electrolyte. These almost rectangular box like shape curves are characteristic of an ideal EDL capacitor, with low ESR. 

Room-temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) are intrinsic ionic conductors which have been successfully employed as nonflammable/nonreactive electrolytes in a range of electrochemical devices, including dye-sensitized solar cells [1,2], lithium batteries [3], fuel cells [4], and supercapacitors [5]. The quantification of mass transport is of interest in any solvent, particularly those employed in electrochemical devices, as it affects the ultimate rate/speed at which the device can operate. The diffusivity or diffusion coefficient (D) of a redox active species, along with other thermodynamic parameters such as the bulk concentration (c) and the stoichiometric number of electrons (n) that are of fundamental significance in any study of an electrode reaction, can be determined experimentally using a range of electroanalytical techniques [6], As with any analytical method, the ideal electroanalytical technique for parameter characterization should be accurate, reproducible, selective, and robust. In many respects voltammetric methods meet these requirements, since they can be... 

The vast amount of work published on lithium batteries shows that an ideal electrolyte does not exist. What one hopes to achieve is a workable electrolyte which has enough combination of desirable properties for an acceptable commercial battery. The literature on the electrolytes for lithium batteries is extremely vast, covering perhaps well over a thousand papers and reviews. No attempt is made here to survey all these publications. The approach adopted is to give a brief synopsis of the main points by giving reference and literature entries to some key papers, especially a few critical reviews that survey the huge amount of literature. A most excellent review was published by Xu in 2004 [1] and this chapter draws heavily upon this publication for the earlier work. More recent work, especially on electrolytes involving ionic liquids is drawn from original publications and our own recent review [2]. 

We discuss classical non-ideal liquids before treating solids. The strongly interacting fluid systems of interest are hard spheres characterized by their harsh repulsions, atoms and molecules with dispersion interactions responsible for the liquid-vapour transitions of the rare gases, ionic systems including strong and weak electrolytes, simple and not quite so simple polar fluids like water. The solid phase systems discussed are ferroniagnets and alloys. 

Standard potentials Ee are evaluated with full regard to activity effects and with all ions present in simple form they are really limiting or ideal values and are rarely observed in a potentiometric measurement. In practice, the solutions may be quite concentrated and frequently contain other electrolytes under these conditions the activities of the pertinent species are much smaller than the concentrations, and consequently the use of the latter may lead to unreliable conclusions. Also, the actual active species present (see example below) may differ from those to which the ideal standard potentials apply. For these reasons formal potentials have been proposed to supplement standard potentials. The formal potential is the potential observed experimentally in a solution containing one mole each of the oxidised and reduced substances together with other specified substances at specified concentrations. It is found that formal potentials vary appreciably, for example, with the nature and concentration of the acid that is present. The formal potential incorporates in one value the effects resulting from variation of activity coefficients with ionic strength, acid-base dissociation, complexation, liquid-junction potentials, etc., and thus has a real practical value. Formal potentials do not have the theoretical significance of standard potentials, but they are observed values in actual potentiometric measurements. In dilute solutions they usually obey the Nernst equation fairly closely in the form ... 

For a battery to give a reasonable power output, the ionic conductivity of the electrolyte must be substantial. Historically, this was achieved by the use of liquid electrolytes. However, over the last quarter of a century there has been increasing emphasis on the production of batteries and related devices employing solid electrolytes. These are sturdy and ideal for applications where liquid electrolytes pose problems. The primary technical problem to overcome is that of achieving high ionic conductivity across the solid. 

About the same time Beutier and Renon (11) also proposed a similar model for the representation of the equilibria in aqueous solutions of weak electrolytes. The vapor was assumed to be an ideal gas and < >a was set equal to unity. Pitzer s method was used for the estimation of the activity coefficients, but, in contrast to Edwards et al. (j)), two ternary parameters in the activity coefficient expression were employed. These were obtained from data on the two-solute systems It was found that the equilibria in the systems NH3+ H2S+H20, NH3+C02+H20 and NH3+S02+H20 could be represented very well up to high concentrations of the ionic species. However, the model was unreliable at high concentrations of undissociated ammonia. Edwards et al. (1 2) have recently proposed a new expression for the representation of the activity coefficients in the NH3+H20 system, over the complete concentration range from pure water to pure NH3. it appears that this area will assume increasing importance and that one must be able to represent activity coefficients in the region of high concentrations of molecular species as well as in dilute solutions. Cruz and Renon (13) have proposed an expression which combines the equations for electrolytes with the non-random two-liquid (NRTL) model for non-electrolytes in order to represent the complete composition range. In a later publication, Cruz and Renon (J4J, this model was applied to the acetic acid-water system. 

A solid electrolyte is an ionic conductor and an electronic insulator. Ideally, it conducts only one ionic species. Aside from a few specialty applications in the electronics industry, solid electrolytes are used almost exclusively in electrochemical cells. They are particularly useful where the reactants of the electrochemical cell are either gaseous or liquid however, they may be used as separators where one or both of the reactants are solids. Used as a separator, a solid electrolyte permits selection of two liquid or elastomer electrolytes each of which is matched to only the solid reactant with which it makes contact. 

Reactive absorption processes occur mostly in aqueous systems, with both molecular and electrolyte species. These systems demonstrate substantially non-ideal behavior. The electrolyte components represent reaction products of absorbed gases or dissociation products of dissolved salts. There are two basic models applied for the description of electrolyte-containing mixtures, namely the Electrolyte NRTL model and the Pitzer model. The Electrolyte NRTL model [37-39] is able to estimate the activity coefficients for both ionic and molecular species in aqueous and mixed solvent electrolyte systems based on the binary pair parameters. The model reduces to the well-known NRTL model when electrolyte concentrations in the liquid phase approach zero [40]. 

Most detergents contain electrolytes, e.g. sulphate, bicarbonate, carbonate or citrate and the presence of these electrolytes increases the adsorption of anionic surfactants at the gas/liquid interface as already mentioned. This leads to a reduction of the surface tension at an equal solution concentration [7] and to a strong decrease of the cmc. The effect can be of several orders of magnitude. Similar to this are the effects of mixtures of surfactants with the same hydrophilic group and different alkyl chain length or mixtures of anionic and non-ionic surfactants as they are mostly used in detergency [8]. Mixtures of anionic and non-ionic surfactants follow the mixing rule (eqn. 3) in the ideal case ... 

In the case where the ionic species in the aqueous electrolyte are fairly hydrophilic and the organic phase features hydrophobic ions, the liquid]liquid junction behaves similarly to an ideally polarizable metal electrode. Under this condition, the Galvani potential difference can be effectively controlled by a four-electrode potentiostat [4,5]. A schematic representation of a typical electrochemical cell is shown in Fig. 1 [6]. Cyclic voltammo-grams illustrating the potential window for the water] 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) interface for various electrolytes are also shown in Fig. 1. In the presence of bis(triphenylpho-sphoranylidene)ammonium hexafluorophosphate (BTPPA PFe) the supporting electrolyte in DCE, the potential window is limited to less than 200 mV due to the hydrophilicity of the anion. Wider polarizable potential ranges are obtained on replacing... 

Separators must have a longtime chemical and mechanical stability in the battery environment. They must be sufficiently elastic so as not to break down in the course of battery assembling and be shockproof. In addition, they must be inexpensive, simple in manufacture, with reproducible properties in large-scale production. An ideal separator must introduce only a minimum resistance to ionic current. The conductance attenuation coefficient varies from 1.1 to 1.6 for simple spacers and from 2 to 8 for porous and ultra porous varieties, reaching 15 only in exceptional cases. Depending on the battery type and function, separators either fill the whole electrode gap or only a part of it. In the latter case electrode surface is in free contact with the free liquid electrolyte, which is sometimes essential for sheet-shaped separators to have several rips in order to ensure a gap between them and the electrodes. 

In conclusion, it appears that few metal-molten salt systems behave in the ideally polarizable sense generally associated with the mercury/aqueous solution interface at 298 K. Possible exceptions include some noble liquid metal/melt systems such as mercury/molten nitrates and lead/molten halides at low temperatures (<773 K), but only when the molten electrolyte is extensively purified. Otherwise, systems need to be analyzed as complex impedances, using ac or pulse techniques, to determine whether the minimum interfacial capacitance is affected by extensive factors, leading to parallel pseudocapacitances and Faradaic components. The range of potentials and measuring frequencies for which the interface approaches ideally polarizable behavior also needs to be established. It now seems clear that the multilayer ionic model of charge distribution at the metal/melt interface is more pertinent to molten media than the familiar double layer associated with aqueous solutions. However, the quantitative theories derived for the former model will have to be revised if it is confirmed that the interfacial capacitance is, indeed, independent of temperature in the ideally polarizable region. 

The above method of stabilization (referred to as electrostatic stabilization) can be produced by the use of ionic surfactants (of the anionic, cationic, or zwitterionic type). However, for a number of reasons this method of stabilization is not ideal for personal care formulations. First, the stabilization is influenced by the presence of electrolytes in the system, which reduces repulsion and may cause instability. In addition, many ionic surfactants cause skin irritation as a result of their penetration and interaction with the stratum corneum (4). The latter is the main barrier to water loss and it consists of lipids that are organized in a bilayer structure (liquid crystalline), which at high water content is transparent and soft (5). Surfactants that interact with the lipid bilayer and reduce its liquid-like nature (by disrupting the liquid crystalline structure) may cause crystallization of the lipids, and this has a drastic effect on the appearance and smoothness of the skin ( dry skin feeling). 

---