Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hydration diffusion

Furthermore, these characterizations will be completed in determining mass transfer parameters a and Ps, Cconv and Jdiff, respectively, the reflection coefficient and the solute permeability of the membranes, the part of solute mass transfer dedicated to convection and Jam the part of mass transfer dedicated to hydration-diffusion, for two synthetic chlorides and sulphates sodium salts solutions under different concentrations, 10-3 and 10-1 M. [Pg.61]

By following Cp vs. the reverse of the permeate flux, it is possible to quantify separately both part of the solute mass transfer occurring in NF convection and solvation (hydration)/diffusion as developed recently [9], The results are expected to be valid only in some limited domains of operating conditions (Jdiff and Cconv = Ctes) but may be useful for the comparison of the behaviour of different membranes. [Pg.63]

Keep in mind, however, that each of these steps is more complex than the foregoing summary statements imply. Some of the complicating factors to consider include waters of hydration diffusing with the adsorbate and the counterions that diffuse with the adsorbate to maintain electroneutrality. Furthermore, adsorbate reaction with a specific surface site does not guarantee a permanent surface complex. It is possible that although reaction with the first site was kinetically favored, there is another, more energetically favorable site available to which the adsorbate could migrate. [Pg.217]

We shall see in Sec. 9.10 that sedimentation and diffusion data yield experimental friction factors which may also be described-by the ratio of the experimental f to fQ, the friction factor of a sphere of the same mass-as contours in solvation-ellipticity plots. The two different kinds of contours differ in detailed shape, as illustrated in Fig. 9.4b, so the location at which they cross provides the desired characterization. For the hypothetical system shown in Fig. 9.4b, the axial ratio is about 2.5 and the protein is hydrated to the extent of about 1.0 g water (g polymer)". ... [Pg.597]

Protein molecules extracted from Escherichia coli ribosomes were examined by viscosity, sedimentation, and diffusion experiments for characterization with respect to molecular weight, hydration, and ellipticity. These dataf are examined in this and the following problem. Use Fig. 9.4a to estimate the axial ratio of the molecules, assuming a solvation of 0.26 g water (g protein)"V At 20°C, [r ] = 27.7 cm g" and P2 = 1.36 for aqueous solutions of this polymer. [Pg.655]

Cyclohexane, produced from the partial hydrogenation of benzene [71-43-2] also can be used as the feedstock for A manufacture. Such a process involves selective hydrogenation of benzene to cyclohexene, separation of the cyclohexene from unreacted benzene and cyclohexane (produced from over-hydrogenation of the benzene), and hydration of the cyclohexane to A. Asahi has obtained numerous patents on such a process and is in the process of commercialization (85,86). Indicated reaction conditions for the partial hydrogenation are 100—200°C and 1—10 kPa (0.1—1.5 psi) with a Ru or zinc-promoted Ru catalyst (87—90). The hydration reaction uses zeotites as catalyst in a two-phase system. Cyclohexene diffuses into an aqueous phase containing the zeotites and there is hydrated to A. The A then is extracted back into the organic phase. Reaction temperature is 90—150°C and reactor residence time is 30 min (91—94). [Pg.242]

Endotliermic Decompositions These decompositions are mostly reversible. The most investigated substances have been hydrates and hydroxides, which give off water, and carbonates, which give off CO9. Dehydration is analogous to evaporation, and its rate depends on the moisture content of the gas. Activation energies are nearly the same as reaction enthalpies. As the reaction proceeds in the particle, the rate of reaction is impeded hy resistance to diffusion of the water through the already formed product. A particular substance may have sever hydrates. Which one is present will depend on the... [Pg.2122]

Sodium borate (borax) [1330-43-4] M 201.2, m 741 , d 2.37. Most of the water of hydration was removed from the decahydrate by evacuation at 25° for three days, followed by heating to 100° and evacuation with a high-speed diffusion pump. The dried sample was then heated gradually to fusion (above 966°), allowed to cool gradually to 200°, then tranferred to a desiccator containing P2O5 [Grenier and Westrum J Am Chem Soc 78 6226 1956]. [Pg.466]

Hydrated bilayers containing one or more lipid components are commonly employed as models for biological membranes. These model systems exhibit a multiplicity of structural phases that are not observed in biological membranes. In the state that is analogous to fluid biological membranes, the liquid crystal or La bilayer phase present above the main bilayer phase transition temperature, Ta, the lipid hydrocarbon chains are conforma-tionally disordered and fluid ( melted ), and the lipids diffuse in the plane of the bilayer. At temperatures well below Ta, hydrated bilayers exist in the gel, or Lp, state in which the mostly all-trans chains are collectively tilted and pack in a regular two-dimensional... [Pg.465]

The diffusion current Id depends upon several factors, such as temperature, the viscosity of the medium, the composition of the base electrolyte, the molecular or ionic state of the electro-active species, the dimensions of the capillary, and the pressure on the dropping mercury. The temperature coefficient is about 1.5-2 per cent °C 1 precise measurements of the diffusion current require temperature control to about 0.2 °C, which is generally achieved by immersing the cell in a water thermostat (preferably at 25 °C). A metal ion complex usually yields a different diffusion current from the simple (hydrated) metal ion. The drop time t depends largely upon the pressure on the dropping mercury and to a smaller extent upon the interfacial tension at the mercury-solution interface the latter is dependent upon the potential of the electrode. Fortunately t appears only as the sixth root in the Ilkovib equation, so that variation in this quantity will have a relatively small effect upon the diffusion current. The product m2/3 t1/6 is important because it permits results with different capillaries under otherwise identical conditions to be compared the ratio of the diffusion currents is simply the ratio of the m2/3 r1/6 values. [Pg.597]

In a discussion of these results, Bertrand et al. [596,1258] point out that S—T behaviour is not a specific feature of any restricted group of hydrates and is not determined by the nature of the residual phase, since it occurs in dehydrations which yield products that are amorphous or crystalline and anhydrous or lower hydrates. Reactions may be controlled by interface or diffusion processes. The magnitudes of S—T effects observed in different systems are not markedly different, which indicates that the controlling factor is relatively insensitive to the chemical properties of the reactant. From these observations, it is concluded that S—T behaviour is determined by heat and gas diffusion at the microdomain level, the highly localized departures from equilibrium are not, however, readily investigated experimentally. [Pg.129]

Metal carbonate decompositions proceed to completion in one or more stages which are generally both endothermic and reversible. Kinetic behaviour is sensitive to the pressure and composition of the prevailing atmosphere and, in particular, to the availability and ease of removal of C02. The structure and porosity of the solid product and its relationship with the reactant phase controls the rate of escape of volatile product by inter-and/or intragranular diffusion, so that rapid and effectively complete withdrawal of C02 from the interface may be difficult to achieve experimentally. Similar features have been described for the removal of water from crystalline hydrates and attention has been drawn to comparable aspects of reactions of both types in Garner s review [ 64 ]. [Pg.167]


See other pages where Hydration diffusion is mentioned: [Pg.316]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.2591]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.1598]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.123]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.597 ]




SEARCH



A Model for Hydration and Diffusion of Polyions

Diffusion and Hydration of Ions in Infinitely Diluted Solution

Diffusion crystal hydrates

Diffusion hydrated crystallines

Diffusion through hydrate cages

Guest Diffusion Through Hydrate Cages

Hydration water diffusion

© 2024 chempedia.info