Hierarchic levels

The gas turbine is a complex system. A typical control system with hierarchic levels of automation is shown in Figure 19-3. The control system at the plant level consists of a D-CS system, which in many new installations is connected to a condition monitoring system and an optimization system. The D-CS system is what is considered to be a plant level system and is connected to the three machine level systems. It can, in some cases, also be connected to functional level systems such as lubrication systems and fuel handling systems. In those cases, it would give a signal of readiness from those systems to the machine level systems. The condition monitoring system... 

For a plant design problem, students will need guidance on the hierarchical levels of decision making to choose a process. Also checklists of information needed for the design of typical parts of commercial processes prove invaluable. These are provided in Dr. Long s student handout. 

As shown in this figure, the format is divided into three main columns labeled Equipment Description, Service Description, and Failure Description. The Equipment Description column may be further divided to show the necessary equipment description levels that make up the taxonomy number. Each column represents one additional hierarchical level and number in the CCPS Taxonomy. Similarly, the Service and Failure Descriptions are divided as needed to fully establish the data cells. An entry or group of entries in a column apply all the way down the column until an additional entry or a horizontal line is reached. 

As briefly discussed in Chapter 3, reverse mentoring implies a mentoring relationship between a mentor and mentee in which the mentor is on a lower hierarchical level than the mentee. This t rpe of relationship could occur whenever a (hierarchically) more junior person possesses insights and experience that will be helpful to a (hierarchically) more senior individual. 

The process of development described here concerns the simple (RBN-based) model, though similar operations do take place in a more complex model. Development occurs at three hierarchical levels the genomic level, the cellular level and the organism (or agent) level. 

A final observation is in order the quantitative application of the equilibrium thermodynamical formalism to living systems and especially to ecosystems is generally inadequate since they are complex in their organisation, involving many interactions and feedback loops, several hierarchical levels may have to be considered, and the sources and types of energy involved can be multiple. Furthermore, they are out-of-equilibrium open flow systems and need to be maintained in such condition since equilibrium is death. Leaving aside very simple cases, in the present state of the art we are, therefore, limited to general semiquantitative statements or descriptions (e.g. ecosystem narratives ). 

The systems approach applied here enables treatment of hierarchic levels for each specific type of transport. 

Processing the initial information to determine the appropriate hierarchic levels and especially those that control the pollution. 

Nowadays, these hierarchical levels are still used to explain the control structure in an organization. Van Mai (Mai van, 1999) uses the terms operational control level, tactical control level and strategic control level, for the technical, managerial and institutional level respectively. The terms used by van Mai will be used in the remainder of this thesis. 

The three hierarchical levels are interconnected by information flowing from the strategic level via the tactical level to the operational level, and the other way around. From upper to the lower level, the information flow is related to the environment on the strategic level, which is the organizational values and norms. However, as Thompson (Thompson, 1967) identified, the tactical control level can allow the operational level to operate as a relatively closed system. The tactical level provides a buffer between the uncertain environment and stability of resources required for uninterrupted production on the operational level. In this way the influences from the external environment on the operational level will be reduced to a minimum. The information flow going from lower to upper level is related to the operational process or transformations. The top down flow provides the restrictions and conditions for the transformation, while the bottom up flow provides information about the status of inputs, outputs, and resources of the transformations. The horizontal information flows are between different control elements on one hierarchical control level. 

In summary, the physiological control of silk protein conversion shows an ingenious balance of activating and inhibiting mechanisms that are dependent on composition and sequence arrangement (Krejchi et al., 1994). Denaturing effects observed in silks appear to be identical to those found in amyloid-forming proteins, and they principally alter the competitive outcome of the hydration of nonpolar and polar residues (Anfinsen, 1973 Dill, 1990 Dobson and Karplus, 1999 Kauzmann, 1959). The key differences to amyloids may lie in the hierarchical level of the structures (Muthukumar et al., 1997) involved in the assembly of silks compared to amyloids. 

The given discussion shows that rather universal and simple classification of porous materials equivalent to classification of crystals is absent. However, one can consider a system of interrelating classifications that take into account order, morphology and sizes at different hierarchical levels, degrees of integrity, structure, heterogeneity of a various type, etc. Such a systematic approach can be used as well for adequate modeling of various hierarchical levels of a porous material structure. 

While modeling the structure and properties of porous materials one usually is interested in structural properties of a desirable hierarchical level. For example, for chemical properties the molecular structure is major, and the specific adsorption and catalytic properties are guided by the structure and composition of particle surface. Diffusion permeability is determined by the supramolecular... 

Further, by analogy, the appropriate models of a bed of granules, chemical reactor as a whole, shop, factory, city, country, etc., up to the Universe can be introduced. But, this systematic set of models is only one among infinite possibilities. While solving particular problems, the considered hierarchical levels can be extended or narrowed with introduction of new sub-levels, or a combination of above-mentioned levels if necessary. The parameters of the given... 

Because the organizational structure of most research proposals is complex, headings of different hierarchical levels (level 1, level 2, level 3, etc.) are needed to help clarify the structure. Two commonly used styles are illustrated in generic... 

Due to Heisenberg s uncertainty and Pauli s exclusion principles, the properties of a multifermionic system correspond to fermions being grouped into shells and subshells. The shell structure of the one-particle energy spectrum generates so-called shell effects, at different hierarchical levels (nuclei, atoms, molecules, condensed matter) [1-3]. 

Figure 6.3 Emergence in simple geometrical forms. At each higher hierarchic level, novel properties appear tliat are not present in the components of the lower levels.

This relation between emergent properties and properties of the basic components has been much debated in the literature. One school of thought claims that the properties of the higher hierarchic level are in principle not deducible from the components of the lower level. This is the so-called strong emergence or radical emergence, that demands, as formulated by Schroeder (1998) that ... 

It is generally accepted that the development of emergent properties, which is an upward (or bottom-up) causality, is attended by a downward - or top-down -causality stream. This means that the higher hierarchic level affects the properties of the lower components, as reflected by Schroder (1998) ... 

---