Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hexavalent Chromium Treatment

While hexavalent chromium is reduced to its trivalent form in treatment systems mainly so that the metal can be precipitated, this also lowers its toxicity by a factor of 1000. Ferrous sulfate can be used for this reduction, but is not popular due to its inefficiency, high sludge generation rate, and expense. Sulfur dioxide gas is a far more economical reducing agent, although it is efficient only at low pH, preferably below 2. There can also be problems with atmospheric emission of S02 in this process. [Pg.67]

The health hazards of SO, treatment can be avoided by using iron or steel scrap as reduction agents, and careful control of pH. A methodology has been developed that approaches the S02 gas method in efficiency and operating cost (Roy 1984). [Pg.67]


The selected treatment option involves the reduction of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium either chemically or electrochemically. The reduced chromium can then be removed using a conventional precipitation-solids removal system. Alternative hexavalent chromium treatment techniques include chromium regeneration, electrodialysis, evaporation, and ion exchange.16... [Pg.369]

Chromium Phosphate. Chromium phosphate treatment baths are strongly acidic and comprise sources of hexavalent chromium, phosphate, and fluoride ions. Conversion coating on aluminum precedes by the foUowing reactions (24) ... [Pg.223]

Chromium Chromate. Chromium chromate treatment baths are acidic and made up from sources of hexavalent chromium and complex fluoride, fluorosiHcate, fluorozirconate, fluorotitanate, and siHcofluorides. Optional additional components added to accelerate coating rate are free fluoride, ferricyanide, and other metal salts such as barium nitrate. Conversion coating on aluminum precedes by the following reactions (2,3,17) ... [Pg.224]

In removing excess free chlorine from municipal or industrial water and from wastewater, sodium sulfite competes with bisulfite or sulfur dioxide. Other commercial appHcations of sodium sulfite in wastewater treatment include the reduction of hexavalent chromium to the less toxic Cr " salts as well as the precipitation of silver and mercury. [Pg.149]

Treatment for the removal of chromium and nickel from electroplating wastewater involves neutralization, hexavalent chromium reduction, pH adjustment, hydroxide precipitation, and final solid-liquid separation.15 37 48... [Pg.240]

Chemical treatment of chromium wastewater is usually conducted in two steps. In the first step hexavalent chromium is reduced to trivalent chromium by the use of a chemical reducing agent. The trivalent chromium is precipitated during the second stage of treatment.15... [Pg.241]

FIGURE 6.2 Rate of reduction of hexavalent chromium in the presence of excess S02 at various pH levels. (Taken from Krofta, M. and Wang, L.K., Design of Innovative Flotation-Filtration Wastewater Treatment Systems for a Nickel-Chromium Plating Plant, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, Technical Report PB-88-200522/AS, January 1984.)... [Pg.243]

Alternatively, hexavalent chromium can be reduced, precipitated, and floated by ferrous sulfide. By applying ferrous sulfide as a flotation aid to a plating waste with an initial hexavalent chromium concentration of 130 mg/L and total chromium concentration of 155 mg/L, an effluent quality of less than 0.05 mg/L of either chromium species can be achieved if a flotation-filtration wastewater treatment system is used.15... [Pg.245]

The newly developed flotation-filtration process involving the use of ferrous sulfide as a flotation aid offers a distinct advantage in the treatment of nickel-chromium plating wastewater that contains hexavalent chromium, nickel, iron, and other metals. [Pg.245]

Hexavalent chromium wastes resulting from rinsewater and the concentrated acid bleed accumulate in the chromium waste sump [T-20], The chromium wastes are then pumped into the chromium treatment module [T-21] for reduction to the trivalent form. This pump is activated only if the oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) and pH are at the proper levels and if the level in the chromium wastewater sump [T-20] is sufficiently high. [Pg.247]

Liquid flowing into the chromium treatment module [T-21] is monitored by a pH instrument that controls a feed pump to add the required amount of sulfuric acid from a storage tank. The sulfuric acid is needed to lower the pH to 2.0 to 2.5 for the desired reduction reaction to occur. An ORP instrument controls the injection rate of sodium metabisulfite solution from a metering pump to reduce hexavalent chromium (Cr6+) to the trivalent state (Cr3+). [Pg.247]

Another innovative flotation-filtration wastewater treatment system adopts the innovative use of the chemical ferrous sulfide (FeS), which reduces the hexavalent chromium and allows separation of chromium hydroxide, nickel hydroxide, and ferric hydroxide in one single step at pH 8.5. Figure 6.7 illustrates the entire system. Again, a DAF-filtration clarifier plays the most important role in this wastewater treatment system. [Pg.249]

Concentrations of hexavalent chromium from metal finishing raw wastes are shown in Table 9.8. Hexavalent chromium enters wastewater as a result of many unit operations and can be very concentrated. Because of its high toxicity, it requires separate treatment so that it can be efficiently removed from wastewater. [Pg.354]

There are three treatment methods applicable to wastes containing hexavalent chromium. Wastes containing trivalent chromium can be treated using chemical precipitation and sedimentation, which is discussed below. The three methods applicable to treatment of hexavalent chromium are... [Pg.373]

Hexavalent chromium reduction through the use of sulfur dioxide and sodium metabisulfite has found the widest application in the metal finishing industry. It is not truly a treatment step, but a conversion process in which the hexavalent chromium is converted to trivalent chromium. The hexavalent chromium is reduced through the addition of the reductant at a pH in the range of 2.5-3 with a retention time of approximately 30-40 min (Figure 9.7). [Pg.373]

Each substrate was oxidized to the corresponding carbonyl compounds in good yields. Moreover, the coexisting olefin linkage remained intact upon treatment with the oxodiperoxochromium complex and no epoxy compounds were observed in the reaction mixture. Hexavalent chromium reagents such as anhydrous chromium trioxide and pyridinium... [Pg.787]

Andco Environmental Processes, Inc., has developed an electrochemical iron generation process to remove hexavalent chromium and other metals from gronndwater and aqneons wastes. As contaminated water flows through a treatment cell, electrical cnrrent passes between electrodes, releasing ferrons and hydroxyl ions. The small gap between electrodes allows almost instantaneons rednction of chromium ions. Depending on the pH, varions solids may form. [Pg.353]

The CFX MiniFix technology can treat solids, sludges, and most liquids. The treatment is applicable to a variety of heavy metals such as aluminum, antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, hexavalent chromium, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc. The technology also treats organic compounds with high molecular weights. [Pg.452]

The process can be used to treat dissolved metals and is commonly used in groundwater treatment for the reduction and precipitation of hexavalent chromium, as well as in the oxidation of cyanide wastes (at concentrations up to 10%). Other potential applications of electrochemical treatment include remediation of arsenic, cadmium, molybdenum, aluminum, zinc,... [Pg.529]

Electrochemical treatment has been used for many years in the mining and utility industries and is a proven technology for removing hexavalent chromium from wastewater. [Pg.529]

In 1996, the ISEE system was used to remove 200 g of hexavalent chromium from 16 yd of soil at the U.S. Department of Energy s (DOE s) Unlined Chromic Acid Pit located at the Sandia National Laboratory s (SNL s) Chemical Waste Landfill in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The treatment costs for this 4-week demonstration were 1368/yd. According to the U.S. EPA, these costs were calculated for the ISEE prototype used during the demonstration. The costs for a full-scale system would be lower due to design improvements and efficiency of scale (D22781Q, pp. 65, 66 D22758R, pp. 44-51). [Pg.943]

Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. (Sevenson), is the owner of the MAECTITE chemical treatment process for the precipitation and stabilization of toxic heavy metals. Chemical treatment by the MAECTITE process converts teachable lead, hexavalent chromium, or other heavy metals into insoluble minerals and mixed mineral forms within the material or waste matrix. The technology can be used as an in situ or an ex situ method and does not use pozzolanic or siliceous binders to stabilize the treated material. [Pg.965]

Replacement of hexavalent chromium with trivalent chromium offers important environmental advantages. Trivalent chromium is considerably less toxic than hexavalent. Trivalent systems use chromium concentrations that are typically two orders of magnitude less than in hexavalent systems. Thus, far less chromium enters the waste stream. Trivalent systems also generate few toxic air emissions, while hexavalent systems involve a reaction that produces hydrogen bubbles which entrain chromium compounds and carry them out of the baths. Trivalent chromium is readily precipitated from wastewater, while hexavalent chromium solutions must go through an additional step in a treatment system in which the chromium is reduced to its trivalent form before precipitation. It has been shown that trivalent chromium systems can successfully replace hexavalent ones for decorative chrome applications. Trivalent chromium systems are not suitable for hard chrome applications. More information regarding trivalent chromium plating can be obtained from Roy (1984), Robison (1978), Chementator (1982), and Smart (1983). [Pg.54]

As discussed, the aqueous waste with hexavalent chromium requires reduction of chromium to the trivalent state prior to metal removal because hexavalent chromium does not form a precipitate. Demonstrated reducing agents are sodium metabisulfite (Na2S205), sulfur dioxide (S02), ferrous sulfide (FeS), and other ferrous ion (ferrous sulfate, ferrous chloride, or electrochemically generated ferrous ion). The treatment processes using these are described below. [Pg.194]


See other pages where Hexavalent Chromium Treatment is mentioned: [Pg.67]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.758]    [Pg.727]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.212]   


SEARCH



Chromium hexavalent

Chromium treatment

© 2024 chempedia.info