Heterogeneous catalysis description

Models and theories have been developed by scientists that allow a good description of the double layers at each side of the surface either at equilibrium, under steady-state conditions, or under transition conditions. Only the surface has remained out of reach of the science developed, which cannot provide a quantitative model that describes the surface and surface variations during electrochemical reactions. For this reason electrochemistry, in the form of heterogeneous catalysis or heterogeneous catalysis has remained an empirical part of physical chemistry. However, advances in experimental methods during the past decade, which allow the observation... 

In spite of the importance of having an accurate description of the real electrochemical environment for obtaining absolute values, it seems that for these systems many trends and relative features can be obtained within a somewhat simpler framework. To make use of the wide range of theoretical tools and models developed within the fields of surface science and heterogeneous catalysis, we will concentrate on the effect of the surface and the electronic structure of the catalyst material. Importantly, we will extend the analysis by introducing a simple technique to account for the electrode potential. Hence, the aim of this chapter is to link the successful theoretical surface science framework with the complicated electrochemical environment in a model simple enough to allow for the development of both trends and general conclusions. 

Nevertheless, the kinetic approach to heterogeneous catalysis can be rewarding if relative data for two or more structurally related reactants or catalysts are acquired and interpreted. Instead of applying several assumptions that simplify the reaction scheme and the model of the surface, which are necessary for absolute kinetic description, it is accepted that, under certain conditions, the same reaction scheme holds for all members of the series of reactants or catalysts and that all of the unknown but identical simplifications in the relative data cancel out. However, it is much safer to select a series of reactants in which the structural change from one member to another will be small enough to uphold the basic features of the mechanism than to assume the same for a set of catalysts that are not minor variations of a basic preparation. 

We need to develop methods to understand trends for complex reactions with many reaction steps. This should preferentially be done by developing models to understand trends, since it will be extremely difficult to perform experiments or DFT calculations for all systems of interest. Many catalysts are not metallic, and we need to develop the concepts that have allowed us to understand and develop models for trends in reactions on transition metal surfaces to other classes of surfaces oxides, carbides, nitrides, and sulfides. It would also be extremely interesting to develop the concepts that would allow us to understand the relationships between heterogeneous catalysis and homogeneous catalysis or enzyme catalysis. Finally, the theoretical methods need further development. The level of accuracy is now so that we can describe some trends in reactivity for transition metals, but a higher accuracy is needed to describe the finer details including possibly catalyst selectivity. The reliable description of some oxides and other insulators may also not be possible unless the theoretical methods to treat exchange and correlation effects are further improved. 

As should be evident from the discussions in Chapters 6 and 7, adsorption phenomena play a major role in colloid and surface chemistry. We also come across other examples in Chapters 11 and 13. Adsorption, especially at solid-gas interfaces, is very important in heterogeneous catalysis, as highlighted in Vignette IX. In this chapter, the focus is the introduction of quantitative measurement and the description of adsorption at solid-gas interfaces. 

Weyl (9) has also outlined a picture of the mechanism of heterogeneous catalysis, which is similar to the schemes proposed by the above authors. His suggestions, based on the quanticule theory of Fajans (10), also result in a qualitative description. 

A detailed description of molecular-beam surface scattering experiments and the results of these studies are given elsewhere (22b, 23). Here we shall discuss only those studies that are important in verifying the nature of active sites in heterogeneous catalysis. 

It is one of the fundamental requirements of research in the physical sciences that any observation reported in the literature should be capable of repetition anywhere at any time. Authors of scientific papers are therefore under an obligation to describe their materials and procedures in sufficient detail to make this possible. Nowhere is this requirement more necessary than in the field of heterogeneous catalysis, where, by reason of the complexity of the material used and the subtlety of the procedures applied in their pretreatment, the results obtained often depend critically on the variables involved. Full, detailed and accurate descriptions of what has been done are therefore needed, as it is sometimes the case that the really critical variable is not recognized by the operator, and is therefore not controlled. Such adequate descriptions are by no means always to be found in published work. 

Three important representative reactions in the field of heterogeneous catalysis have been selected for a more detailed description ... 

Georgii Boreskov, an eminent Soviet scientist in catalysis, devoted his research to the creation of an adequate physicochemical language for describing the phenomenon of heterogeneous catalysis, and he considered thermodynamics the fundamentals for the description. His analysis of the thermodynamic bases of catalytic processes produced the commonly accepted and experimentally proved Boreskov s rule on the approximate constancy of the specific catalytic activity ... 

The cluster model approach and the methods of analysis of the surface chemical bond have been presented and complemented with a series of examples that cover a wide variety of problems both in surface science and heterogeneous catalysis. In has been show that the cluster model approach permits to obtain qualitative trends and quantitative structural parameters and energetics of problems related to surface chemistry and more important, provide useful, unbiased information that is necessary to interpret experiments. In this way, the methods and models discussed in the present chapter are thought to be an ideal complement to experiment leading to a complete and detailed description of the mechanism of heterogeneous catalysis. 

With that in mind, this presentation will deal with the most frequent general problem in the study of heterogeneous catalysis The determination of a quantity called catalyst activity, the experimental procedures, and methods of interpretation leading to a proper description of this quantity. 

Although recent literature gives evidence for a homogeneous reaction on the catalyst surface (cf. Section 3.3.5.3.2) the commercial processes show typical features of heterogeneous catalysis and do not comply with the definition of homogeneous catalysis given in the preface. Therefore a description of the manufacturing process is not included here but it is dealt with in [59]. 

A most significant aspect of the chemistry of niobium and tantalum has been the development of heterogeneous catalysis and its relationship to the surface and bulk properties of the solid supports.668-679 In this concluding section, molecular connections between fundamental coordination chemistry and surface and bulk properties of solids, particularly the oxides, are emphasized. A broad description of Nb compounds and heterogeneous catalysis is available.670... 

In the book, the section on homogeneous catalysis covers soft Pt(II) Lewis acid catalysts, methyltrioxorhenium, polyoxometallates, oxaziridinium salts, and N-hydroxyphthalimide. The section on heterogeneous catalysis describes supported silver and gold catalysts, as well as heterogenized Ti catalysts, and polymer-supported metal complexes. The section on phase-transfer catalysis describes several new approaches to the utilization of polyoxometallates. The section on biomimetic catalysis covers nonheme Fe catalysts and a theoretical description of the mechanism on porphyrins. 

The series of 10 chapters that constitute Part 3 of the book deals mainly with the use of adsorption as a means of characterizing carbons. Thus, the first three chapters in this section complement each other in the use of gas-solid or liquid-solid adsorption to characterize the porous texture and/or the surface chemistry of carbons. Porous texture characterization based on gas adsorption is addressed in Chapter 11 in a very comprehensive manner and includes a description of a number of classical and advanced tools (e.g., density functional theory and Monte Carlo simulations) for the characterization of porosity in carbons. Chapter 12 illustrates the use of adsorption at the liquid-solid interface as a means to characterize both pore texture and surface chemistry. The authon propose these methods (calorimetry, adsorption from solution) to characterize carbons for use in such processes as liquid purification or liquid-solid heterogeneous catalysis, for example. Next, the surface chemical characterization of carbons is comprehensively treated in Chapter 13, which discusses topics such as hydrophilicity and functional groups in carbon as well as the amphoteric characteristics and electrokinetic phenomena on carbon surfaces. 

---