Heterogeneity parameter variabilities

In estimating the range of ingested doses which could have resulted in a given biomarker concentration, there are three main sources of variability errors in model selection, errors in estimation of model parameters, and tme population variability (i.e., heterogeneity). The variability due to the first two sources can be reduced by the collection... 

It is noted in eq. (4.4-2) that the characteristic energy of the reference vapour is used as the distributed variable, and therefore the functional form of the distribution f(Eo) would reflect the heterogeneity of the solid. Hence the parameters of such distribution function are the solid heterogeneity parameters. 

Analysis of such a correlation may reveal the significant variables and interactions, and may suggest some model, say of the L-H type, that could be analyzed in more detail by a regression process. The variables Xi could be various parameters of heterogeneous processes as well as concentrations. An application of this method to isomerization of /i-pentane is given by Kittrel and Erjavec (Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 7,321 [1968]). 

Heterogeneous conditions both in terms of hydrodynamics and composition prevails in the GI tract. Parameters such as D, Cs, V, and h are influenced by the conditions in the GI tract which change with time. Thus, time dependent rate coefficients govern the dissolution process under in vivo conditions. One of the major sources of variability for poorly soluble drugs can be associated with the time dependent character of the rate coefficient, which governs drug dissolution under in vivo conditions. 

Electron movement across the electrode solution interface. The rate of electron transfer across the electrode solution interface is sometimes called k. This parameter can be thought of as a rate constant, although here it represents the rate of a heterogeneous reaction. Like a rate constant, its value is constant until variables are altered. The rate constants of chemical reactions, for example, increase exponentially with an increasing temperature T according to the Arrhenius equation. While the rate constant of electron transfer, ka, is also temperature-dependent, we usually perform the electrode reactions with the cell immersed in a thermostatted water bath. It is more important to appreciate that kei depends on the potential of the electrode, as follows ... 

The validity of an electroanalytical measurement is enhanced if it can be simulated mathematically within a reasonable model , that is, one comprising all of the necessary elements, both kinetic and thermodynamic, needed to describe the system studied. Within the chosen model, the simulation is performed by first deciding which of the possible parameters are indeed variables. Then, a series of mathematical equations are formulated in terms of time, current and potential, thereby allowing the other implicit variables (rate constants of heterogeneous electron-transfer or homogeneous reactions in solution) to be obtained. 

In the context of assessment factors, it is important to distinguish between the two terms variability and uncertainty. Variability refers to observed differences attributable to true heterogeneity or diversity, i.e., inherent biological differences between species, strains, and individuals. Variability is the result of natural random processes and is usually not reducible by further measurement or study although it can be better characterized. Uncertainty relates to lack of knowledge about, e.g., models, parameters, constants, data, etc., and can sometimes be minimized, reduced, or eliminated if additional information is obtained (US-EPA 2003). 

Variability refers to observed differences in a population or parameter attributable to true heterogeneity (Brusle 1991). It is the result of natural random or stochastic processes and stems from, for example, environmental, lifestyle, and genetic differences. Examples include variation between individuals in pesticide sensitivity and foraging behavior (e.g., time spent foraging in the agroenvironment) and between locations (e.g., soil type, climate, chemical concentration). 

The analysis of covariance between a continuous variable (P is the curve shape parameter from the Weibull function) and a discrete variable (process) was determined using the general linear model (GLM) procedure from the Statistical Analysis System (SAS). The technique of the heterogeneity of slopes showed that there was no significant difference (Tables 5 and 6). 

It is important to have the correct set of variables specified as independent and dependent to meet the modeling objectives. For monitoring objectives observed conditions, including the aforementioned independent variables (FICs, TICs, etc.) and many of the "normally" (for simulation and optimization cases) dependent variables (FIs, TIs, etc.) are specified as independent, while numerous equipment performance parameters are specified as dependent. These equipment performance parameters include heat exchanger heat transfer coefficients, heterogeneous catalyst "activities" (representing the relative number of active sites), distillation column efficiencies, and similar parameters for compressors, gas and steam turbines, resistance-to-flow parameters (indicated by pressure drops), as well as many others. These equipment performance parameters are independent in simulation and optimization model executions. 

Uncertainty analysis and sensitivity analysis are tools that provide insight on how model predictions are affected by data precision. One of the issues in uncertainty analysis that must be confronted is how to rank both individual inputs and groups of inputs according to their contribution to overall uncertainty. In particular, there is a need to distinguish between the relative contribution of true uncertainty versus variability (i.e. heterogeneity), as well as to distinguish model uncertainty from parameter uncertainty. This case-study illustrates methods of uncertainty representation and variance characterization. 

Like the previous ones, these models are two-level models. Now, the retentiontime model substitutes the probabilistic transfer model in the first level, and in the second level, parameters of this model are assumed to be random and they are associated with a given distribution. Consider, for instance, the one-compartment model with Erlang retention times where the parameter A is a random variable expressing the heterogeneity of the molecules. Nevertheless, even for the simplest one-compartment case, the model may reach extreme complexity. In these cases, analytical solutions do not exist and numerical procedures have to be used to evaluate the state probability profiles. 

---