Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Henry s law constant, use

A more recent study for estimating Henry s law constants using the bond contribution method was provided by Meylan and Howard (1991). In this study, the authors updated and revised the method developed by Hine and Mookeijee (1975) based on new experimental data that have become available since 1975. Bond contribution values were determined for 59 chemical bonds based on known Henry s law constants for 345 organic compounds. A good statistical fit [correlation coefficient (r ) = 0.94] was obtained when the bond contribution values were regressed against known Henry s law constants for all compounds. For selected chemicals classes, r increased slightly to 0.97. [Pg.16]

Mackay et al. (2000) recommend the bond contribution method of Meylan and Howard (1991), one of two methods of predicting the Henry s law constant used by the SRC program HENRYWIN. These are developed from the work of Hine and Mookeijee (1975). HENRYWIN also predicts the Henry s law constant based on a group contribution method. [Pg.61]

Calculated Henry s law constants, using the ratio of vapour pressure and water solubility, can also be determined (Table 3.2). Using vapour pressure and water solubility values presented above, a calculated log Aw value of 0.58 for the 8 2 FTOH was suggested by Goss et al. [77] to be more accurate than their measured log Kaw value, due to difficulties with adsorption of the 8 2 FTOH in the experimental setup. [Pg.37]

Experiments to measure the Henry s law constant use either a direct approach of measuring Cair and C in a system at equilibrium or a kinetic approach that monitors the rate of evaporative loss from an aqueous solution, which depends on this parameter (see Evaporation, Chapter 4). [Pg.34]

The ratio 2300 Is sometimes called the Henry s law constant for the ethanol In blood-ethanol in breath system. It Is assumed to be independent of temperature over the narrow ranges encountered in forensic work. However, in using molar concentration units for ethanol In blood and in breath, is unitless. This differs from the units for the Henry s law constant used In the book(Unit 11, p. 184 i.e. mol dm" atm" )because, although we expressed the concentration of the solute In the liquid In the units of mol dm" , the dissolvinggas was expressed intermsof partial pressure (in atm). Workir with partial pressures is more useful when the solubility of gases iike02, CO2, N2 is being considered. The conversion factor is ... [Pg.452]

Find the expressions for the Henry s law constants using parts per million, percentage by volume, and percentage by mass. [Pg.255]

The stream summary result is shown in Figure 7.4 the number of stages required to achieve the desired separation (i.e., mole fraction of 0.003 in exit air stream) is 4. The result obtained by PRO/II is closer to the hand-calculated results. This is attributed to the Henry s law constants used. [Pg.334]

This experiment provides an alternative approach to measuring the partition coefficient (Henry s law constant) for volatile organic compounds in water. A OV-101 packed column and flame ionization detector are used. [Pg.611]

Equation 6 shows that the adsorption of component 1 at a partial pressureis reduced in the presence of component 2 as a result of competition for the available surface sites. There ate only a few systems for which this expression (with 5 1 = q 2 = 5 ) provides an accurate quantitative representation, but it provides useful quaUtative or semiquantitative guidance for many systems. In particular, it has the correct asymptotic behavior and provides expHcit recognition of the effect of competitive adsorption. For example, if component 2 is either strongly adsorbed or present at much higher concentration than component 1, the isotherm for component 1 is reduced to a simple linear form in which the apparent Henry s law constant depends onp. ... [Pg.256]

Ideal gas properties and other useful thermal properties of propylene are reported iu Table 2. Experimental solubiUty data may be found iu References 18 and 19. Extensive data on propylene solubiUty iu water are available (20). Vapor—Hquid—equiUbrium (VLE) data for propylene are given iu References 21—35 and correlations of VLE data are discussed iu References 36—42. Henry s law constants are given iu References 43—46. Equations for the transport properties of propylene are given iu Table 3. [Pg.123]

ILs, on the other hand, are uniquely suited for use as solvents for gas separations. Since they are non-volatile, they cannot evaporate to cause contamination of the gas stream. This is important when selective solvents are used in conventional absorbers, or when they are used in supported liquid membranes. For conventional absorbers, the ability to separate one gas from another depends entirely on the relative solubilities (ratio of Henry s law constants) of the gases. In addition, ILs are particularly promising for supported liquid membranes, because they have the potential to be incredibly stable. Supported liquid membranes that incorporate conventional liquids eventually deteriorate because the liquid slowly evaporates. Moreover, this finite evaporation rate limits how thin one can make the membrane. This... [Pg.90]

The solubilities of the various gases in [BMIM][PFg] suggests that this IL should be an excellent candidate for a wide variety of industrially important gas separations. There is also the possibility of performing higher-temperature gas separations, thanks to the high thermal stability of the ILs. For supported liquid membranes this would require the use of ceramic or metallic membranes rather than polymeric ones. Both water vapor and CO2 should be removed easily from natural gas since the ratios of Henry s law constants at 25 °C are -9950 and 32, respectively. It should be possible to scrub CO2 from stack gases composed of N2 and O2. Since we know of no measurements of H2S, SO, or NO solubility in [BMIM][PFg], we do not loiow if it would be possible to remove these contaminants as well. Nonetheless, there appears to be ample opportunity for use of ILs for gas separations on the basis of the widely varying gas solubilities measured thus far. [Pg.91]

Henry s Law Constants and Optimum Stripping Factors for Selected Organic Compounds for Use th Tray Towers... [Pg.101]

The Henry s law constant for the solubility of radon in water at 30°C is 9.57 X 10-6 Mlmm Hg. Radon is present with other gases in a sample taken from an aquifer at 30°C. Radon has a mole fraction of 2.7 X 10-6 in the gaseous mixture. The gaseous mixture is shaken with water at a total pressure of 28 atm. Calculate the concentration of radon in the water. Express your answers using the following concentration units. [Pg.282]

HARRIOTT 25 suggested that, as a result of the effects of interfaeial tension, the layers of fluid in the immediate vicinity of the interface would frequently be unaffected by the mixing process postulated in the penetration theory. There would then be a thin laminar layer unaffected by the mixing process and offering a constant resistance to mass transfer. The overall resistance may be calculated in a manner similar to that used in the previous section where the total resistance to transfer was made up of two components—a Him resistance in one phase and a penetration model resistance in the other. It is necessary in equation 10.132 to put the Henry s law constant equal to unity and the diffusivity Df in the film equal to that in the remainder of the fluid D. The driving force is then CAi — CAo in place of C Ao — JPCAo, and the mass transfer rate at time t is given for a film thickness L by ... [Pg.613]

The equilibrium concentration in seawater is described by Henry s Law, which relates the partial pressure of the gas to its concentration (see Chapter 5 and Waser, 1966). Using the appropriate values of Henry s Law constant, Kh, and the partial pressures of gases in the atmosphere, the equilibrium concentrations of several gases are given in Table 10-11 for 0°C and 24°C. [Pg.260]

This equation can be simplified to give H = P/S, where H is now Henry s law constant, which has dimensions of atm mVmole. Values for H may be calculated or measured (Mackay et al. 1979), and are now widely used infugacity modeling (see Section 3.2). [Pg.69]

In its simplest form a partitioning model evaluates the distribution of a chemical between environmental compartments based on the thermodynamics of the system. The chemical will interact with its environment and tend to reach an equilibrium state among compartments. Hamaker(l) first used such an approach in attempting to calculate the percent of a chemical in the soil air in an air, water, solids soil system. The relationships between compartments were chemical equilibrium constants between the water and soil (soil partition coefficient) and between the water and air (Henry s Law constant). This model, as is true with all models of this type, assumes that all compartments are well mixed, at equilibrium, and are homogeneous. At this level the rates of movement between compartments and degradation rates within compartments are not considered. [Pg.106]

Henry s Law Constants. When available, experimental values of Henry s law constants were used. When experimental values could not be found, values were estimated using the method outlined by Mackay (20, 21, 22) ... [Pg.205]

Physical and Chemical Properties. Most of the important physical-chemical properties of acrylonitrile have been determined (see Chapter 3). However, the partitioning of acrylonitrile between the air and water has been evaluated by using an estimated value for a Henry s law constant. This general approach assumes that the concentration of the chemical in water is low. Because acrylonitrile is relatively soluble in water, this approach may not be accurate. Experimental measurement of the partition coefficient for acrylonitrile at water-air interfaces would be useful in refining models on the behavior of acrylonitrile in the environment. [Pg.89]

When solubility and vapor pressure are both low in magnitude and thus difficult to measure, it is preferable to measure the air-water partition coefficient or Henry s law constant directly. It is noteworthy that atmospheric chemists frequently use Kwa, the ratio of water-to-air concentrations. This may also be referred to as the Henry s law constant. [Pg.4]

The van t Hoff equation also has been used to describe the temperature effect on Henry s law constant over a narrow range for volatile chlorinated organic chemicals (Ashworth et al. 1988) and chlorobenzenes, polychlorinated biphenyls, and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (ten Hulscher et al. 1992, Alaee et al. 1996). Henry s law constant can be expressed as the ratio of vapor pressure to solubility, i.e., pic or plx for dilute solutions. Note that since H is expressed using a volumetric concentration, it is also affected by the effect of temperature on liquid density whereas kH using mole fraction is unaffected by liquid density (Tucker and Christian 1979), thus... [Pg.7]

In the multimedia models used in this series of volumes, an air-water partition coefficient KAW or Henry s law constant (H) is required and is calculated from the ratio of the pure substance vapor pressure and aqueous solubility. This method is widely used for hydrophobic chemicals but is inappropriate for water-miscible chemicals for which no solubility can be measured. Examples are the lower alcohols, acids, amines and ketones. There are reported calculated or pseudo-solubilities that have been derived from QSPR correlations with molecular descriptors for alcohols, aldehydes and amines (by Leahy 1986 Kamlet et al. 1987, 1988 and Nirmalakhandan and Speece 1988a,b). The obvious option is to input the H or KAW directly. If the chemical s activity coefficient y in water is known, then H can be estimated as vwyP[>where vw is the molar volume of water and Pf is the liquid vapor pressure. Since H can be regarded as P[IC[, where Cjs is the solubility, it is apparent that (l/vwy) is a pseudo-solubility. Correlations and measurements of y are available in the physical-chemical literature. For example, if y is 5.0, the pseudo-solubility is 11100 mol/m3 since the molar volume of water vw is 18 x 10-6 m3/mol or 18 cm3/mol. Chemicals with y less than about 20 are usually miscible in water. If the liquid vapor pressure in this case is 1000 Pa, H will be 1000/11100 or 0.090 Pa m3/mol and KAW will be H/RT or 3.6 x 10 5 at 25°C. Alternatively, if H or KAW is known, C[ can be calculated. It is possible to apply existing models to hydrophilic chemicals if this pseudo-solubility is calculated from the activity coefficient or from a known H (i.e., Cjs, P[/H or P[ or KAW RT). This approach is used here. In the fugacity model illustrations all pseudo-solubilities are so designated and should not be regarded as real, experimentally accessible quantities. [Pg.8]

Most conventional organic contaminants are fairly hydrophobic and thus exhibit a low but measurable solubility in water. Solubility is often used to estimate the air-water partition coefficient or Henry s law constant, but this is not possible for miscible chemicals indeed the method is suspect for chemicals of appreciable solubility in water, i.e., exceeding 1 g/100 g. Direct measurement of the Henry s law constant is thus required. [Pg.11]

Such relationships have been applied to solubility, vapor pressure, Kow, KAW, KOA, Henry s law constant, reactivities, bioconcentration data and several other environmentally relevant partition coefficients. Of particular value are relationships involving various manifestations of toxicity, but these are beyond the scope of this handbook. These relationships are valuable because they permit values to be checked for reasonableness and (with some caution) interpolation is possible to estimate undetermined values. They may be used (with extreme caution ) for extrapolation. [Pg.14]


See other pages where Henry s law constant, use is mentioned: [Pg.41]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.1259]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.992]    [Pg.1003]    [Pg.1005]    [Pg.1005]    [Pg.1036]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.28]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.95 ]




SEARCH



Henry constant

Henry’s constant

Henry’s law

Henry’s law constant

Law, Henry

Laws Henry’s Law

© 2024 chempedia.info