Dynamic headspace

Gas Chromatographic Methods. Gas chromatographic methods may be used for measuring volatile oxidation products. Static headspace, dynamic headspace, or direct injection methods may be employed. Specific aldehydes may be measured as indicators for oxidative stability of oils and fats. Thus, propanal is an and as indicator for stability of omega-3 fatty acids, whereas hexanal is best for following the oxidative stability of omega-6 fatty acids. 

Figure 21.7 Headspace, dynamic mode. The sample is recovered by thermal desorption (stripping) of a purge-and-trap cartridge, chosen as a function of the compound to be extracted.

Gas chromatographic (GC) methods have been used for determining volatile oxidation products. Static headspace, dynamic headspace or direct injection methods are the three commonly used approaches. These methods were compared in an analysis of volatile compounds in an oxidized soybean oil. It was found that each method produced significantly different GC profiles (Frankel 1985). The dynamic headspace and direct injection methods gave similar results, but the static headspace is more sensitive to low molecular weight compounds. Lee and co-workers (1995) developed a dynamic headspace procedure for isolating and analyzing the volatiles from oxidized soybean oil, and equations were derived from theoretical considerations that allowed the actual concentration of each flavor component to be calculated. 

The flavor isolation methods which most readily lend themselves to quality control applications are static headspace, dynamic headspace, direct injection and solvent extraction techniques. Since there are numerous recent reviews in the literature on these methods, there is little need to present any detail here but only summarize the key points about a given method. The reader can refer to reviews provided by Jennings and Shibamoto (4) Reineccius and Anandaraman (5), Reineccius (6) or Teranishi and Kint (7) for more detail. 

Table 3 Volatile Flavor Compounds Sampled Under Static Headspace, Dynamic Headspace, and Model Mouth Conditions Determined by Gas Chromatography and Their Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients (Log P)...

Sampled under static headspace, dynamic headspace, and model mouth conditions and their octanol/water partition coefficients (log P). Raw data in Fig. 1. 

There are a variety of ways that the sample or fractions of the sample (e.g., an extract) can be analysed by GC-MS. These include static headspace, dynamic headspace, solution injection and pyrolysis. 

Dynamic headspace GC/MS. The distillation of volatile and semivolatile compounds into a continuously flowing stream of carrier gas and into a device for trapping sample components. Contents of the trap are then introduced onto a gas chromatographic column. This is followed by mass spectrometric analysis of compounds eluting from the gas chromatograph. 

When a comparative analysis of the headspace volatiles of living and picked osmanthus flowers was performed by the dynamic headspace trapping method using Tenax GC, even more dramatic differences were observed, shown in Table 20 (60). 

Bianchi, F., Careri, M., and Musci, M. (2005). Volatile norisoprenoids as markers of botanical origin of Sardinian strawberry-tree (Arbutus unedo L.) honey Characterisation of aroma compounds by dynamic headspace extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 89,527-532. 

Headspace methods provide an indirect method of sample analysis suitable for the determination of organic volatiles [11,318-323]. The gas diase in contact with the sample and not the sample matrix itself is taken for analysis. If the sample is in thermodynamic equilibrium with the gas phase in a closed thermostated vessel, then this method of analysis is referred to as static headspace. If a carrier gas is passed over the sample and the sample volatiles accumulated in a cryogenic or sorbent trap, then the method is generally referred to as dynamic headspace. If the carrier gas is introduced below the surface of... 

Dynamic headspace sampling employs the continuous removal of... 

Gas phase stripping (purge-and-trap) techniques can iaq>rove the yield of organic volatiles from water or biological fluids by facilitating the transfer of volatiles from the liquid to the gas phase it is also more suitable than dynamic headspace sampling when the sample volume is restricted (320 23,347-351). Tbe technique is used routinely in many laboratorl B for the analysis... 

Small solid seuaples can be analyzed directly by dynamic headspace sampling using a platinum coil and quartz crucible pyrolyzer and cold trap coupled to an open tubular column (341,369,379). This method has been used primarily for the analysis of mineral samples and of additives, catalysts and byproducts in finished polymers which yield unreliable results using conventional headspace techniques owing to the slow release of the volatiles to the headspace. At the higher temperatures (450-1000 C) available with the pyrolyzer the volatiles are more readily and completely removed from the sample providing for quantitative analysis. 

The principles behind MAP liquid-phase and gas-phase extractions are fundamentally similar and rely on the use of microwaves to selectively apply energy to a matrix rather than to the environment surrounding it. MAP gas-phase extractions (MAP-HS) give better sensitivity than the conventional static headspace extraction method. MAP-HS may also be applied in dynamic applications. This allows the application of a prolonged, low-power irradiation, or of a multi-pulse irradiation of the sample, thus providing a means to extract all of the volatile analytes from the matrix [477]. 

There are basically three methods of liquid sampling in GC direct sampling, solid-phase extraction and liquid extraction. The traditional method of treating liquid samples prior to GC injection is liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), but several alternative methods, which reduce or eliminate the use of solvents, are preferred nowadays, such as static and dynamic headspace (DHS) for volatile compounds and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and solid-phase extraction (SPE) for semivolatiles. The method chosen depends on concentration and nature of the substances of interest that are present in the liquid. Direct sampling is used when the substances to be assayed are major components of the liquid. The other two extraction procedures are used when the pertinent solutes are present in very low concentration. Modem automated on-line SPE-GC-MS is configured either for at-column conditions or rapid large-volume injection (RLVI). 

Static headspace may also be carried out by substituting the heating step by a microwave treatment. In this procedure the material is immersed in a solvent that is transparent to microwaves relative to the sample in order to impart most, if not all, of the microwave energy to the sample [208]. Another configuration of MAP gas-phase extraction relates to dynamic headspace sampling. 

Applications The potential of a variety of direct solid sampling methods for in-polymer additive analysis by GC has been reviewed and critically evaluated, in particular, static and dynamic headspace, solid-phase microextraction and thermal desorption [33]. It has been reported that many more products were identified after SPME-GC-MS than after DHS-GC-MS [35], Off-line use of an amino SPE cartridge for sample cleanup and enrichment, followed by TLC, has allowed detection of 11 synthetic colours in beverage products at sub-ppm level [36], SFE-TLC was also used for the analysis of a vitamin oil mixture [16]. 

Dynamic headspace GC-MS involves heating a small amount of the solid polymer sample contained in a fused silica tube in a stream of inert gas. The volatile components evolved on heating the sample are swept away from the sample bulk and condensed, or focused on a cryogenic trap before being introduced onto the chromatographic column via rapid heating of the trap. The technique can be used qualitatively or quantitatively DHS-GC-MS is considered to be well suited towards routine quantitative analysis. 

Either static or dynamic headspace gas GC is used to examine residual solvents in polymeric materials. Figure 43 shows the complex volatiles liberated from a printed multi-layer salad wrap, heated at 300°C under nitrogen. 

J. Ai, Headspace solid phase microextraction. Dynamics and quantitative analysis before reaching a partition equilibrium, Anal. Chem., 69, 3260 (1997). 

Other workers have discussed the application of dynamic headspace analysis to the determination of aliphatic hydrocarbons in seawater [14-18]. 

---