Hazards quantification

The Chemical Process Industry (CPI) uses various quantitative and qualitative techniques to assess the reliability and risk of process equipment, process systems, and chemical manufacturing operations. These techniques identify the interactions of equipment, systems, and persons that have potentially undesirable consequences. In the case of reliability analyses, the undesirable consequences (e.g., plant shutdown, excessive downtime, or production of off-specification product) are those incidents which reduce system profitability through loss of production and increased maintenance costs. In the case of risk analyses, the primary concerns are human injuries, environmental impacts, and system damage caused by occurrence of fires, explosions, toxic material releases, and related hazards. Quantification of risk in terms of the severity of the consequences and the likelihood of occurrence provides the manager of the system with an important decisionmaking tool. By using the results of a quantitative risk analysis, we are better able to answer such questions as, Which of several candidate systems poses the least risk Are risk reduction modifications necessary and What modifications would be most effective in reducing risk ... 

After the serious hazards have been identified with a HAZOP study or some other type of qualitative approach, a quantitative examination should be performed. Hazard quantification or hazard analysis (HAZAN) involves the estimation of the expected frequencies or probabilities of events with adverse or potentially adverse consequences. It logically ties together historical occurrences, experience, and imagination. To analyze the sequence of events that lead to an accident or failure, event and fault trees are used to represent the possible failure sequences. 

Recognition of the hazards or potential hazards Quantification of the extent of the hazard, usually by measuring physical/chemical factors and their duration, and relating them to known or required standards... 

Since endosulfan is a cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenase inducer, the quantification of specific enzyme activities (e.g., aminopyrine-A -demethylase, aniline hydroxylase) may indicate that exposure to endosulfan has occurred (Agarwal et al. 1978). Because numerous chemicals and drugs found at hazardous waste sites and elsewhere also induce hepatic enzymes, these measurements are nonspecific and are not necessarily an indicator solely of endosulfan exposure. However, these enzyme levels can be useful indicators of exposure, together with the detection of endosulfan isomers or the sulfate metabolite in the tissues or excreta. 

But it will also be seen that vapour pressure estimation methods provide critical analysis of all parameters involved in a fire hazard and thus allow refinement of the methods leading to a quantification of this risk. 

In addition to the evaluation of chemical process hazards, and the proper applications of the evaluation to process design and operation, the management systems are important to assure operation of the facilities as intended. Brief introductions into hazard identification and quantification, and into management controls from the perspective of process safety are presented in Chapter 4. Future trends are also briefly reviewed here. 

Introduction Many natural and artificial substances are toxic to humans (and animals). Liquids and solids can be ingested, or exposure can be through the skin, eyes, or other external passages to the body. Where these substances are gaseous or volatile, toxic effects can result from inhalation. As a result ofaccidents and tests, it has been discovered that some of these substances are more toxic than others. Quantification of the degree of hazard has become important in devising appropriate measures for containing these substances. 

Conducting a hazard evaluation, including quantification of inventories of potential fuels. 

Because airborne and volatile contaminants can present a significant threat to industrial workers health and safety, identification and quantification of these airbome and volatile contaminants through air/soil monitoring is an essential component of a health and safety program at an industrial site having hazardous substances. The purpose of air and soil monitoring is to identify and quantify airbome and volatile hazardous contaminants in order to determine the level of plant worker s protection needed. 

In some instances, provisional guideline values have been set for constiments for which there is some evidence of a potential hazard but where the available information on health effects is limited. Provisional guideline values have also been set for substances for which the calculated guideline value would be below the practical quantification level, or below the level that can be achieved through practical treatment methods, as well as for certain substances when it is likely that guideline values will be exceeded as a result of disinfection procedures. 

This Report culminates in the presentation of the principles and framework for a comprehensive and risk-based hazardous waste classification system. NCRP does not propose a particular implementation of the proposed classification system (e.g., a particular quantification in terms of limits on concentrations of hazardous substances in each waste class) this is most appropriately left to governmental policy organizations. The relationship of the proposed risk-based waste classification system to existing regulations is discussed in Section 7.2. 

The basic framework for the waste classification system developed in this Report is depicted in Figure 6.1. Starting with the objectives that the classification system should apply to any waste that contains radionuclides or hazardous chemicals and that all such waste should be classified based on risks to the public posed by its hazardous constituents, the fundamental principle of the proposed system is that hazardous waste should be classified in relation to disposal systems (technologies) that are expected to be generally acceptable in protecting public health. This principle leads to the definitions of three classes of waste, and to quantification of the boundaries of the different waste classes based on considerations of risks that arise from different methods of disposal. The boundaries normally would be specified in terms of limits on concentrations of hazardous substances. At the present time, nearly all hazardous and nonhazardous wastes are intended for disposal in a near-surface facility or a geologic repository, and these are the two types of disposal systems assumed in classifying waste. The three waste classes and their relationship to acceptable disposal systems are described in more detail in Section 6.2. 

The Sediment Quality Triad (SQT) is an effects-based conceptual approach that can be used to assess and determine the status of contaminated sediments based on biology (laboratory and/or in situ toxicity tests), chemistry (chemical identification and quantification), and ecology (community structure and/or function). It provides a means for comparing three different lines of evidence (LOE) and arriving at a weight of evidence (WOE) determination regarding the risk posed by contaminated sediments. Effectively, each LOE comprises an independent assessment of hazard combined and integrated, they provide an assessment of risk. 

---