Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hazard models

You should be able to estimate the quantities of material contained within a section from mechanical and operating data. You should also consider operating conditions, which should be available from the plant mass balance or from actual operating data. Simple hazard models can predict the size of vapor clouds, radiation hazards from fires, and explosion over-pressures. Such models are available from a number of sources. [Pg.102]

In many plant sections a mixture of materials will be present. Since very few hazard models can handle mixtures, you will need to select a single representative material. For flammable materials it is generally most appropriate to choose the material whose boiling point is closest to the average nonnal boiling point of the mixture. For toxic materials you can select the most toxic material, but the initial concentration must be reduced to reflect the concentration in the released material. [Pg.125]

Bendell, A. Proportional Hazards Modeling in Reliability Assessment. Reliability Engineering, Vol. 2, 1983, pp. 175-183. [Pg.235]

Wightman, D. W. and A. Bendell. The Practical Application of Proportional Hazards Modeling. Proceedings of the 5th National Reliability Conference. Birmingham, England, 1985, 2B/3,... [Pg.237]

Note that the term censor is introduced in the preceding table. The log-rank test (invoked in SAS with PROC LIFETEST) and the Cox proportional hazards model (invoked in SAS with PROC PHREG) allow for censoring observations in a time-to-event analysis. These tests adjust for the fact that at some point a patient may no longer be able to experience an event. The censor date is the last known time that the patient did not experience a given event and the point at which the patient is no longer considered able to experience the event. Often the censor date is the last known date of patient follow-up, but a patient could be censored for other reasons, such as having taken a protocol-prohibited medication. [Pg.121]

Hazard ratios are created using the Cox proportional hazards model through PROC PHREG. [Pg.232]

Time-to-event analysis in clinical trials is concerned with comparing the distributions of time to some event for various treatment regimens. The two nonparametric tests used to compare distributions are the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. The Cox proportional hazards model is more useful when you need to adjust your model for covariates. [Pg.259]

The symposium was planned as a state-of-the-art meeting, focusing on the basic science. Program areas included high heat polymers, fire performance of polymers, hazard modeling, mechanism of flammability and fire retardation, char formation, effects of surfaces on flammability, smoke assessment and formation mechanisms, and combustion product toxicity. [Pg.1]

Calculations were made, for many fire scenarios, in which the fire hazard model F.A.S.T. was used to simulate hazard to occupants of a standard room following a fire starting in a plenum above it. A total of 400 m of PVC wire coating was assumed to be present in the plenum. Its decomposition was made a function of the plenum... [Pg.592]

Other computer models and analytical tools are used to predict how materials, systems, or personnel respond when exposed to fire conditions. Hazard-specific calculations are more widely used in the petrochemical industry, particularly as they apply to structural analysis and exposures to personnel. Explosion and vapor cloud hazard modeling has been addressed in other CCPS Guidelines (CCPS, 1994). Again, levels of sophistication range from hand calculations using closed-form equations to numerical techniques. [Pg.414]

New scientific or technical information relating to the cause of the incident or its subsequent effect. A first time failure in a specific type of equipment or a higher loss than previously experienced are examples of this second category. In fact, data from actual incidents are a primary source for the development of hazard models. [Pg.334]

The first processes we consider are environmental production and distribution, and the probable modes of human exposure. Then we consider the distribution to tissues even though this area of inquiry, pharmacokinetics, has not yet had a tremendous impact on deciding whether or not a chemical represents a public health hazard, models of physiological distribution are important in understanding toxicology in humans. [Pg.14]

The most popular method for analysis of covariance is the proportional hazards model. This model, originally developed by Cox (1972), is now used extensively in the analysis of survival data to incorporate and adjust for both centre and covariate effects. The model assumes that the hazard ratio for the treatment effect is constant. [Pg.204]

In this study reported by Bedikian et al. (2006), several potential baseline prognostic factors were included in a proportional hazards model. These factors were ... [Pg.205]

The proportional hazards model, as the name suggests, assumes that the hazard ratio is a constant. As such it provides a direct extension of the logrank test, which is a simple two treatment group comparison. Indeed if the proportional hazards model is fitted to data without the inclusion of baseline factors then the p-value for the test Hg c = 0 will be essentially the same as the p-value arising out of the logrank test. [Pg.207]

It is interesting to examine how control for various comorbid factors influences the mortality hazard associated with sleep durations. Comorbidities aside, in Cox proportional hazards models for each gender, controlling only for age and hours of sleep, the sample excess fractions (20) of deaths related to sleep durations other than 7 hr were 16.4% for women and 19.4% for men. These fractions are the percentage of observed deaths that would not have occurred in the 6-year fol-... [Pg.198]

Using regression analysis based on Cox s proportional hazards model, Ott and Zober (1996) found evidence of association between 2,3,7,8-TCDD exposure and digestive cancer (conditional risk ratio of 1.46 95% 0=1.13-1.89) the primary tumor sites were the liver, stomach, and pancreas. [Pg.88]

Bedaux JJM, Kooijman SALM. 1994. Statistical analysis of bioassays, based on hazard modeling. Environ Ecol Stat 1 303-314. [Pg.326]

Moore DW, Schluchter MD, Scott GI. 1990. Use of hazard models in evaluating the effect of exposure duration on the acute toxicity of three pesticides. In Landis WG, Van der Schalie H, editors. Aquatic toxicology and risk assessment. Volume ASTM STP 1096. Philadelphia (PA) American Society for Testing and Materials, p 247-263. [Pg.349]

Platt RW, Joseph KS, Ananth CV, Grondines J, Abrahamowicz M, Kramer MS (2004) A proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariates and time-varying effects for analysis of fetal and infant death. Am J Epidemiol, 160(3) 199-206. [Pg.288]

NFPA 269 Standard Test Method for Developing Toxic Potency Data for Use in Fire Hazard Modeling... [Pg.659]

Calculate hazard zones using well-established and validated hazard models, using experimental data or previous incident data when available ... [Pg.72]

Dellaportas, P. and Smith, A. F. M. (1993). Bayesian inference for generalized linear and proportional hazards models via Gibbs sampling. Applied Statistics, 42, 443 159. [Pg.266]

Data from a 7-year follow-up study in another Cd-polluted area (Nagasaki) showed that, in both men and women, serum p2-microglobulin and creatinine, as well as urinary total protein and p2-microglobulin were significantly related to mortality independent of age as assessed by the Cox s proportional hazards model [111]. In advanced cases, the excess mortality of subjects with Cd-induced renal tubular dysfunction might, to some extent, be ascribed to a reduction in GFR. [Pg.796]

Methods that involve studying the disposition of some exogenously administered agent (e.g. indocyanine green, antipyrine, galactose or dextromethorphan) have now been superceded by functional (often multicomponent) tests. Mono-ethylglycinexylidide formation has not found wide acceptance. More complicated Cox proportional hazards models may exist for other liver diseases, but are only used specifically for them (e.g. the Mayo Clinic Survival Model for primary biliary cirrhosis see the US FDA Guidance). [Pg.253]

Although we do not cover them in detail, there ate parametric methods to analyze time to event data of this type, the most notable of which is Cox s proportional hazards model. [Pg.114]


See other pages where Hazard models is mentioned: [Pg.84]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.766]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.796]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.114]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.200 , Pg.201 , Pg.202 , Pg.203 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.200 , Pg.201 , Pg.202 , Pg.203 ]




SEARCH



A Systemic Causation Model for Hazards-Related Incidents

Computational Bayesian Approach to Proportional Hazards Model

Cox s proportional hazards model

Geochemical modeling hazardous waste deep-well injection

Hazard Assessment Risk Model,

Hazard extrapolation test models

Hazardous waste deep-well injection modeling

Hazards reentry, unified field model

Hazards-related incident causation models

Hazards-related incident systemic causation model

Kinetic modeling, hazard evaluation

Kinetic modeling, hazard evaluation reaction

Model Hazard Communication Plan

Models hazardous waste site remediation

Poisson Regression and Proportional Hazards Model

Probabilistic Models with Random Hazard Rates

Proportional hazards model

Proportional hazards model computational Bayesian approach

Random Hazard-Rate Models

Retention-Time Models with Random Hazard Rates

Small-Facility Model Hazard Communication Plan

Survival data proportional hazards model

Systemic Socio-Technical Causation Model for Hazards-Related Incidents

Systemic causation model for hazards-related

Systemic causation model for hazards-related occupational incidents

Systemic causation models for hazards

Systemic socio-technical causation model, hazards-related

The Proportional Hazards Model

© 2024 chempedia.info