Hammett Resonance effects

Let us illustrate this with the example of the bromination of monosubstituted benzene derivatives. Observations on the product distributions and relative reaction rates compared with unsubstituted benzene led chemists to conceive the notion of inductive and resonance effects that made it possible to explain" the experimental observations. On an even more quantitative basis, linear free energy relationships of the form of the Hammett equation allowed the estimation of relative rates. It has to be emphasized that inductive and resonance effects were conceived, not from theoretical calculations, but as constructs to order observations. The explanation" is built on analogy, not on any theoretical method. 

There were two schools of thought concerning attempts to extend Hammett s treatment of substituent effects to electrophilic substitutions. It was felt by some that the effects of substituents in electrophilic aromatic substitutions were particularly susceptible to the specific demands of the reagent, and that the variability of the polarizibility effects, or direct resonance interactions, would render impossible any attempted correlation using a two-parameter equation. - o This view was not universally accepted, for Pearson, Baxter and Martin suggested that, by choosing a different model reaction, in which the direct resonance effects of substituents participated, an equation, formally similar to Hammett s equation, might be devised to correlate the rates of electrophilic aromatic and electrophilic side chain reactions. We shall now consider attempts which have been made to do this. 

If the two interaction mechanisms maintain the same relative importance throughout the reaction series, that is, if the ratio pj/pi is constant, Eq. (7-26) becomes identical in form with Eq. (7-24). This in fact appears to be the usual situation in Hammett correlations, PP- and the two interaction mechanisms are commonly discussed in terms of the inductive and resonance effects of electronic displacement. 

A further complication arises with Ingold s suggestion" that both the inductive and resonance effects are composed of initial state equilibrium displacements that reveal themselves in equilibrium properties like dipole moments and equilibrium constants and of time-dependent displacements produced during reaction by the approach of an attacking reagent, observed rate effects being resultants of both types of electronic effects. Hammett, however, claims that it is not necessary or possible to make this distinction. 

Few other reactions of series of substituted pyridines have been investigated extensively. Dondoni, Modena, and Todesco have measured the rate of N-oxidation of a limited series of pyridines and found a good correlation with normal u-values with a p-value of — 2.23. The A-alkylation of pyridines with alkyl iodides in nitrobenzene has been studied by Brown and Cahn and by Clarke and Rothwell. Unfortunately, the only data available are for the parent compound and for alkyl derivatives, and, since the a-values for the various alkyl groups in a given position are substantially constant, this leaves a correlation of only three independent points. However, the rates of A-alkylation of the j8- and y-alkyl derivatives are so nearly equal that it appears as if no correlation existed. Clarke and Rothwell have also studied the alkylation with allyl bromide in nitromethane at various temperatures, and in this case a more extensive series is available. The authors state that no overall Hammett correlation is obtained however, the j8-substituted derivatives fall on one straight line and the y-derivatives on another one with a different slope. The data are shown in Fig. 2. The line for the j8-compounds, p = — 2.53 0.31, r = 0.95, is seen not to be very good the line for the y-derivatives, p = — 1.42 0.06, r = 0.99, is much more satisfactory. It does not seem likely that the discrepancy is due to the intervention of resonance effects, since in this case one would expect the correlation for the y-derivatives to be poorer than that for the j8-analogs. More extensive studies with a wider variety of substituents would seem very desirable. 

Finally, in this account of multiparameter extensions of the Hammett equation, we comment briefly on the origins of the a, scale. This had its beginning around 1956 in the a scale of Roberts and Moreland for substituents X in the reactions of 4-X-bicyclo[2.2.2]octane-l derivatives. However, at that time few values of o were available. A more practical basis for a scale of inductive substituent constants lay in the o values for XCHj groups derived from Taft s analysis of the reactivities of aliphatic esters into polar, steric and resonance effects . For the few o values available it was shown that o for X was related to o for XCHj by the equation o = 0.45 <7. Thereafter the factor 0.45 was used to calculate c, values of X from o values of XCH2 . ... 

The effect of a substituent on the aromatic substitution reaction is similar to its effect on electrophilic side chain reactions, but not precisely parallel. Thus the Hammett relationship using the usual sigma or substituent constants gives considerable scatter when applied to aromatic substitution. The scatter is probably due to an increased importance of resonance effects in the nuclear substitution reaction as compared with the side chain reactions. 

This has been developed since 1986. The title letters stand for Localized Delocalized Response. The localized effect is Charton s preferred name for the inductive effect and delocalized effect is his preferred name for the resonance effect. Indeed, he would like to change the usual symbols from <7/ to 0/, and or to op for the purposes of the Extended Hammett (EH or LD) equation109. The response referred to is that of the substituent to the electronic demand of the site (i.e. reaction site in the correlation analysis of reactivity). Thus this equation, like the PSP equation, is concerned with the parametrization of substituent polarizability. 

CTp) Hammett Polar and resonance effects in conjugated systems (for meta and para substituents)... 

This preparative scheme leads to only 30% yield due to the side reactions between the meto-astatoaniline diazonium salt and astato-phenol, which cannot be eliminated even by continuous extraction of the product with n-heptane (167). All the astatophenols synthesized to date have been identified by either HPLC (99,104) or TLC (160,166,167). Their dissociation constants (KJ have been established from extraction experiments by measuring the relative distribution of compounds between aqueous borax buffer solutions and n-heptane as a function of acidity. On the basis of these derived values, the Hammett a-constants and hence the field (F) and resonance (R) effects have been estimated for these compounds (167) (see Table VI). The field effect for astatine was found to be considerably weaker than that for other halogens the resonance effect was similar to that for iodine (162). 

The astatoanilines were identified by HPLC (99, 104, ISO) and TLC (160, 166, 167). The values established by extraction experiments using n-heptane and citrate buffer solutions are given in Table VI, along with estimates of the Hammett cr-values, field, and resonance effects. 

It has been found that the chemical shift of the benzylidene carbon, Sct, in ring-substituted benzaldoximes (Scheme 2) correlates well with Hammett a constants. On the other hand, it is known that the chemical shift of that atom in the NMR spectra of benzaldoximes depends mainly on the substituents inductive effect and its resonance effect is of reduced importance. Multiparameter correlations of Scr with the inductive and resonance substituents constants are of better quality. It is known that the chemical shifts of para-substituted benzaldoximes are linearly dependent on Hammett a constants. Correlations between the NMR chemical shifts of the oximino oxygen and a, a and aj substituent constants for substituted benzaldoximes are poor. These results show that coplanarity of Ar—CH=NOH creates difficulties in transmission of the substituents effect, especially the resonance effect, to the CH=NOH group. ... 

Substituent effects on redox potentials can be rationalized by free energy relationships in many cases Although 1 can be related to aromatic compounds, a linear correlation with Hammett s a-constants fails. As can be seen from the substituents -N(CH3)2 Ik) and -OCH3 11) the electron attracting effect is the dominating one and not the resonance effect. Therefore Taft s a "-constants describe the substituent effects more correctly. According to (1)... 

Astatophenols, 31 64-65 dissociation constants, Hammett s-constants, field, and resonance effects, 31 66... 

The DSP approach nicely answers the controversial question about which substituent parameters should be employed to correlate pKa data for 4-substituted pyridinium ions. Statistically, the best correlation is given by Eq. (9), which has values to measure the resonance contribution of a substituent, a result in keeping with chemical intuition. This correlation is statistically superior to a Hammett treatment, where both resonance and inductive effects of a group are combined into a single parameter, p or ap.53,54 Moreover, now it is possible to rationalize why a simple Hammett treatment using ap works so well. Equation (9) reveals that the protonation equilibrium is much more sensitive to an inductive effect (p, — 5.15) than to a resonance effect (p = 2.69). Hence, substituent parameters, such as erp, which are derived from a consideration of the dissociation constants for benzoic acids where resonance contributions are small serve as a useful approximation. The inductive effect is said to have a larger influence on pKa values for pyridinium ions than for benzoic acids because the distance between the substituent and the reactive site is shorter in the pyridine series.53... 

The use of different kinds of substituent constants complicates the application of the Hammett equation and over 20 different sets of o values have been proposed. A simplification is the representation of substituent constants as linear combinations of two terms, one representing "field" or "inductive" effects and the other resonance effects.6/f... 

Similarly, those reactions that are strongly assisted by withdrawal of electrons from the reaction site, such as nucleophilic aromatic substitution, give a poor fit to a Hammett plot for the substituents that are capable of withdrawing electrons by delocalization (—N02, —N2 , —C=N, and so on). An example is Reaction 16 in Table 26-7. To correlate reactivity data with structures where strong resonance effects operate, different sets of substituent constants are required.1... 

The Hammett cr-values contain contributions from both inductive/field effects and the resonance effect. The cr-constant can be separated quantitatively into a resonance component R, which operates mainly in the para position, and an inductive component F, which is assumed to be equal in the meta and para positions. Hansch, Leo and Taft11 have calculated the F and R values of Me3Si to be 0.01 and —0.08, respectively, as quoted in Table 1. These values seem somewhat at odds with experimentally determined values12-18 for the inductive and resonance parameters, which give mean values of —0.08 and 0.06, respectively. These values confirm the generally accepted view that MesSi is electron-supplying by inductive effects and electron-withdrawing by resonance effects. 

Hammett s success in treating the electronic effect of substituents on the equilibria rates of organic reactions led Taft to apply the same principles to steric, inductive, and resonance effects. The Hammett o constants appear to be made up primarily of two electronic vectors field-inductive effect and resonance effect. For substituents on saturated systems, such as aliphatic compounds, the resonance effect is rarely a factor, so the o form the benzoic acid systems is not applicable. Taft extended Hammett s idea to aliphatics by introducing a steric parameter ( .). He assumed that for the hydrolysis of esters, steric and resonance effects will be the same whether the hydrolysis is catalyzed by acid or base. Rate differences would be caused only by the field-inductive effects of R and R in esters of the general formula (XCOOR), where X is the substituent being evaluated and R is held constant. Field effects of substituents X could be determined by measuring the rates of acid and base catalysis of a series XCOOR. From these rate constants, a value a could be determined by Equation (5.9) ... 

Hammett s equation was also established for substituted phenols from the elementary hydroxyl radical rate constants. The Hammett resonance constant was used to derive a QSAR model for substituted phenols. The simple Hammett equation has been shown to fail in the presence of electron-withdrawing or electron-donating substituents, such as an -OH group (Hansch and Leo, 1995). For this reason, the derived resonance constants such as o°, cr, and o+ were tested in different cases. In the case of multiple substituents, the resonance constants were summed. Figure 5.24 demonstrates a Hammett correlation for substituted phenols. The least-substituted compound, phenol, was used as a reference compound. Figure 5.24 shows the effects of different substituents on the degradation rates of phenols. Nitrophenol reacted the fastest, while methoxyphenol and hydroxyphenol reacted at a slower rate. This Hammett correlation can be used to predict degradation rate constants for compounds similar in structure. 

---