Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

General variation functions

If we write the sum of the kinetic and potential energy operators as the Hamiltonian operator T + V = H, the ESE may be written as [Pg.9]

One of the remarkable results of quantum mechanics is the variation theorem, which states that [Pg.9]


Values for the enthalpy of solution of hydrogen in transition metals at infinite dilution shown in Figure 7.22 are more negative for the early transition metals. It should be noted that the enthalpies of solution in general are functions of the concentration of the solute. Still, the values at infinite dilution are useful when looking for systematic variations, particularly since changes with composition are often limited. [Pg.221]

Because of antisymmetry, variations of that are simply Unear transformations of occupied orbitals have no effect other than a change of normalization. For orbital functions with fixed normalization, a general variation of takes the form = Hi ni Ha( 1 — na) fScf. The variational condition is... [Pg.62]

In bound-state calculations, the Rayleigh-Ritz or Schrodinger variational principle provides both an upper bound to an exact energy and a stationary property that determines free parameters in the wave function. In scattering theory, the energy is specified in advance. Variational principles are used to determine the wave function but do not generally provide variational bounds. A variational functional is made stationary by choice of variational parameters, but the sign of the residual error is not determined. Because there is no well-defined bounded quantity, there is no simple absolute standard of comparison between different variational trial functions. The present discussion will develop a stationary estimate of the multichannel A -matrix. Because this matrix is real and symmetric for open channels, it provides the most... [Pg.134]

This matrix can be computed from the general variational formula derived in Chapter 8, using a complete set of vibronic basis functions... [Pg.170]

The enthalpy function, H, was first introduced in Frame 10, equation (10.8). In Figure 18.1, Frame 18 was shown the general variation of the Gibbs energy G as a function of temperature, T and using the equation ... [Pg.66]

The Generalized Multistructural Wave Function (GMS) [1,2] is presented as a general variational many-electron method, which encompasses all the variational MO and VB based methods available in the literature. Its mathematical and physico-chemical foundations are settled. It is shown that the GMS wave function can help bringing physico-chemical significance to the classical valence-bond (VB) concept of resonance between chemical structures. The final wave functions are compact, easily interpretable, and numerically accurate. [Pg.117]

On dividing by (1 — k) the second function can be brought into exactly the same form as the first, only with (1 + k) / (1 — k) instead of c. If we now choose the parameters in the variation function so as to make the energy a minimum, the same solution will be obtained with both methods. The equivalence of both methods in further approximations is quite generally true (Longuet-Higgins). ... [Pg.288]

The general variation of minimum ignition energy with pressure and temperature would be that given in Eq. (67), in which one must recall that Sl is also a function of the pressure and the Tf of the mixture. Figure 6 from Blanc et al. [14] shows the variation of Q[ as a function of the equivalence ratio. The variation is very similar to the variation of quenching distance with the equivalence ratio... [Pg.345]

A. Putrino, D. Sebastiani, and M. Parrinello (2000) Generalized variational density functional perturbation theory. J. Chem. Phys. 113, p. 7102... [Pg.281]

In this context, studies on transformants of LLC-PKi cells that expressed P-gp derived from human, monkey, canine, rat, and mouse impressively showed altered efflux activities and rankings depended on the species for substances such as clarithromycin, daunorubicin, digoxin, etoposide, paclitaxel, quinidine, ritonavir, saquinavir, verapamil, and vinblastine [76]. Subsequent experiments confirmed different inhibitory effects of verapamil and quinidine on the transport of daunorubicin, digoxin, and cyclosporin A across LLC-PKi cells with P-gp from different species [77]. These reports clearly pointed out that qualitative statements, whether a substance is a transporter substrate or not, are possible. But it was also underlined that one has to be really careful when applying permeability data of in vitro experiments or in vivo animal studies to human conditions. In general, the functional consequences of species variation may vary from compound to compound, and further studies are needed on this aspect [78]. [Pg.274]

With this Identity It becomes c ar that Equation 5 with complex basis functions of the form e f(re ) Is Identical to Equation 3 with real basis functions of the form f(r). Thus this more general variational principle can be used to reinterpret calculations which used complex scaling In the Hamiltonian but various kinds of complex basis functions In Equation 3. Such calculations (11,12) were the first successful applications of these Ideas to systems of more than two electrons. [Pg.19]

TWo questions obvious from our discussion here are what is the basis for the generalized variational principle of Equations 4 and 5, and what are its limitations For example. It Is not known to what extent this principle Is applicable for problems In which the potentials do not approach a constant at large distances as in the case of the Stark effect. The Heinon-Helles potential is another such problem, but the calculation in reference 40, which blithely Ignored this question, apparently gave meaningful results. The state of affairs is that we have a number of successful and extremely suggestive numerical experiments, but, except for calculations which can be related to a specific analytic continuation of the Hamiltonian as a function of Its coordinates, they have taken Equations 4 and 5 as an ansatz and we have no fundamental proof that It Is correct to do so. [Pg.30]

Variation of the generalized energy functional E c yields the generalized xc potential... [Pg.674]

The chance of an incident is generally a function of the distance traveled. Thus, the frequency of an accident is often expressed as an accident rate per mile. Contributions from non-accident-initiated events are typically expressed on a frequency-per-hour or per-year basis. Thus, the duration of the hazardous materials movement is a key parameter. Figure 5.3 illustrates the basic calculation sequence for one trip or movement. If multiple trips are made, the total risk is equal to the number of trips times the risk per trip. The basic calculation sequence will have minor variations for each mode of transport and can be broken down into greater detail as needed. Increased detail might include different accident rates and lengths for each segment of a route or might explicitly address the accident rates and release probabilities for different accident causes. Inputs to the analysis that may be altered or may influence the calculation include ... [Pg.83]

Most generally, the variational functional of R-matrix theory takes the form = dqdx E-W q,x)p [Pg.316]

And in consummation it is necessary to make the following important conclusion. The affirmation [227, 228], that for dendrimers the exponent value in Mark-Kuhn-Houwink equation is close to zero and even can be negative is incorrect (see Table 24). This affirmation is based on the plots N MM) construction in the supposition /Cr,=const. As a matter of fact, the constant is a function of [1, 5]. vdue can be changed within the limits of 0-2, that follows from the equation (4) at general variation ofZ) =l-3 [56]. Devalue and, hence, a depends on concrete molecular architecture of polymers. [Pg.220]

This energy expression can be used to build up the respective variational functional to get the molecular orbitals [above]. A crucial step in the general self-consistent reaction field procedure is the estimation of the solvent charge density needed to obtain the response function G(r,r ) and the reaction potential. The use of Monte Carlo or molecular dynamics simulations of the system consisting the solute and surrounding solvent molecules has been proposed to find the respective solvent static and polarization densities. [Pg.662]


See other pages where General variation functions is mentioned: [Pg.9]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.786]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.1236]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.501]   


SEARCH



Functional general

Functional variation

General functions

General variational

Variate functions

Variation function

Variational function

Variational functional

© 2024 chempedia.info