Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Funding Environmental Protection Agency

Provides regulator). information for the chemical process industiy. The ChemAlliance site was made possible in large part due to funding provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. ChemAlliance is a partnership between the Chemical Industiy, EPA s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, and the ChemAlliance staff who reside at Michigan Technological University, Pacific Northwest National Laborator)>, and University of Wisconsin. [Pg.308]

The research described in this document has been funded wholly by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This manuscript has been subjected to the Agency s peer and administrative review, and it has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or conmiercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. [Pg.145]

The Super fund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 (Public Law 99-499) extended and amended the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA or Superfund). This public law directed the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) to prepare toxicological profiles for hazardous substances which are most commonly found at facilities on the CERCLA National Priorities List and which pose the most significant potential threat to human health, as determined by ATSDR and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The lists of the 250 most significant hazardous substances were published in the Federal Register on April 17, 1987, on October 20, 1988, on October 26, 1989, and on October 17, 1990. [Pg.3]

Vfe thank William Ball, Samuel Karlckhoff, and Phil Gschwend for helpful suggestions and comments. This study was supported by the Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreements R-808851 and R-812462-01-0. Although the information described in this article has been funded in part by the U.S. EPA, it has not been subjected to the Agency s required peer and administrative review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred. [Pg.213]

Work supported in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "Although the research described in this article has been funded wholly or in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through Contract Numbers 68-02-3476 and 68-02-3751 to Aerodyne Research,... [Pg.172]

Funding for research conducted and reported (2) was provided under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Grant No. R804533> Cincinnati, Ohio. [Pg.34]

Primary fundings for these investigations were provided by the American Water Works Research Foundation and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Environmental and Biomedical Research. The co-operation and advice of James S. Fritz, Harry J. Svec, Ron Webb, O. Thomas Love, Michael Taras and the various representatives of the fourteen water utilities are gratefully acknowledged. [Pg.98]

Acknowledgement. The initial portion of this research was supported by Agricultural Research Service, U.S.D.A., contract No. 12-14-100-9493(34) administered by Crops Research Division, Beltsville, Maryland. Appreciation goes to Dr. S. K. Mukerji and Kay Jolley for their participation. The final stages of the work in which John Perchorowicz and Lance Evans participated was supported by Federal Funds from the Environmental Protection Agency under grant number 801311. [Pg.19]

Acknowledgement. This project has been financed in part with Federal funds from the Environmental Protection Agency under grant number 801311. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of EPA, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. The authors would like to thank Ms. Joan Vereen for technical assistance and Dr. Robert J. Beaver for statistical analysis. [Pg.74]

Based on the demonstration funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in Frederick, Maryland, the vendor estimated the costs associated with building and maintaining a Living Machine for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Table 1 displays the capital costs for Living Machine systems that process 40,000 gal per day (gpd), 80,000 gpd, and 1,000,000 gpd. The operations and maintenance costs for the systems are shown in Table 2. Table 3 demonstrates the total annual costs for the systems (D22581K, pp. 13-9-13-13). [Pg.837]

Many helpful discussions with Richard T DeCesar are gratefully acknowledged. This work was partially funded by a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (R807375010). [Pg.86]

The authors wish to thank Enterprise Ireland (El), the Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology (IRCSET) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in Ireland for funding green chemistry research in Nicholas Gathergood s group. [Pg.154]

Two trace element studies are being done to answer some of these questions. The first study, funded by the Environmental Protection Agency, concerns coal washing and is designed to determine the distribution of certain trace elements in coal. The various specific gravity fractions of coal are separated by a sink-float procedure. Commercially available organic fluids are used as the separation media. [Pg.147]

I thank John Aber, Helga Van Miegroet, Charles Driscoll, M. Robbins Church, and Larry Baker for their reviews of various iterations of this chapter their comments made important contributions to the overall quality. I also thank Mary Beth Adams (Fernow Experimental Forest, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station), Charles Driscoll (Syracuse University), and Peter Murdoch (U.S. Geological Survey, Albany, NY) for the use of their data. The preparation of this document was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Contract No. 68-C8-0006 with ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc. It has been subjected to the Agency s peer and administrative review and approved for publication. [Pg.277]

Superfund A program funded by the US federal government and managed by the US Environmental Protection Agency to remediate seriously contaminated sites in the United States. [Pg.467]

This work was funded in part by the Western Region Hazardous Substance Research Center as sponsored by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under Assistance ID number R825689-01, and by a National Science Foundation Student Fellowship. [Pg.69]


See other pages where Funding Environmental Protection Agency is mentioned: [Pg.104]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.760]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.1090]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.213]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.133 , Pg.195 ]




SEARCH



Environmental Protection Agency

Environmental protection

Funding

Funding agencies

Funds

© 2024 chempedia.info