Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Functional adsorption

Chromatographic and electrophoretic separations are truly orthogonal, which makes them excellent techniques to couple in a multidimensional system. Capillary electrophoresis separates analytes based on differences in the electrophoretic mobilities of analytes, while chromatographic separations discriminate based on differences in partition function, adsorption, or other properties unrelated to charge (with some clear exceptions). Typically in multidimensional techniques, the more orthogonal two methods are, then the more difficult it is to interface them. Microscale liquid chromatography (p.LC) has been comparatively easy to couple to capillary electrophoresis due to the fact that both techniques involve narrow-bore columns and liquid-phase eluents. [Pg.200]

The analysis of solids after dispersion in liquids offers a number of advantages because of the availability of a number of titration techniques, which augment the functional adsorption on dry surfaces. For acid-base potentiometrlc titration of Insoluble oxides in aqueous media the principle has already been explained in sec. I.5.6e and we shall return to it in sec. 3.7a. For amphoteric oxides the (pristine) point of zero charge can be measured it is determined by the difference between pK3,.,(jand pEjigg with some theoretical analysis these two constants can also be established individually. [Pg.51]

The catalyst or the substrate is immobilized (via fixation, functionalization, adsorption, etc.) at the electrode surface (heterogeneous catalysis). [Pg.47]

Petkovska, M. and Petkovska, L.T., Use of nonlinear frequency response for discriminating adsorption kinetics mechanisms resulting with bimodal characteristic functions. Adsorption, 9, 133-142, 2003. [Pg.327]

When basic LDH is mixed or intercalated with acidic solid component, such as a zeolite, the composite will show a dual functional adsorption for CO2 and NH3. Okada et al. investigated the adsorption behaviors of MgAl-LDH/alumi-nosilicate composites and found that the adsorptivity of the composites for both of the probe molecules is dependent on the preparation pathways. The composite prepared via sol/precipitation shows a superior adsorption for both acidic and basic gases to those prepared via mechanical mixing and reconstruction methods (360). This is quite similar to the case of the dual acid/base properties of LDH-derived oxides, especially the LDH-polyoxometallate-derived oxides, which have been carefully examined by a similar adsorption method (361). [Pg.416]

A more complex approach to enhancement of surface properties is the addition of chemical modifiers which increase the concentration of the existing desired functionalities. Adsorption of acids or bases which alter the concentration and reactivity of alumina surface hydroxyls is a good example. [Pg.571]

An exhaustive compilation regarding the use of aluminas for chemical separations would be quite an undertaking. As shown in Figure 12, the broad range of surface affinities allows these materials to be used to remove a wide range of chemical functionalities. Adsorption of Ci to Cs alcohols on aluminas in gas and liquid phase is common [17,18]. Selective removal of alcohols and thiols and their interaction has been examined [19]. [Pg.576]

The second detergent function is to prevent formation of varnishes that come from polymerization of deposits on hot surfaces of the cylinder and the piston. Finally, by adsorption on metallic surfaces, these compounds have anti-corrosion effects. [Pg.360]

Smith [113] studied the adsorption of n-pentane on mercury, determining both the surface tension change and the ellipsometric film thickness as a function of the equilibrium pentane pressure. F could then be calculated from the Gibbs equation in the form of Eq. ni-106, and from t. The agreement was excellent. Ellipsometry has also been used to determine the surface compositions of solutions [114,115], as well polymer adsorption at the solution-air interface [116]. [Pg.78]

Measuring the electron emission intensity from a particular atom as a function of V provides the work function for that atom its change in the presence of an adsorbate can also be measured. For example, the work function for the (100) plane of tungsten decreases from 4.71 to 4.21 V on adsorption of nitrogen. For more details, see Refs. 66 and 67 and Chapter XVII. Information about the surface tensions of various crystal planes can also be obtained by observing the development of facets in field ion microscopy [68]. [Pg.301]

Various functional forms for / have been proposed either as a result of empirical observation or in terms of specific models. A particularly important example of the latter is that known as the Langmuir adsorption equation [2]. By analogy with the derivation for gas adsorption (see Section XVII-3), the Langmuir model assumes the surface to consist of adsorption sites, each having an area a. All adsorbed species interact only with a site and not with each other, and adsorption is thus limited to a monolayer. Related lattice models reduce to the Langmuir model under these assumptions [3,4]. In the case of adsorption from solution, however, it seems more plausible to consider an alternative phrasing of the model. Adsorption is still limited to a monolayer, but this layer is now regarded as an ideal two-dimensional solution of equal-size solute and solvent molecules of area a. Thus lateral interactions, absent in the site picture, cancel out in the ideal solution however, in the first version is a properly of the solid lattice, while in the second it is a properly of the adsorbed species. Both models attribute differences in adsorption behavior entirely to differences in adsorbate-solid interactions. Both present adsorption as a competition between solute and solvent. [Pg.391]

Fig. XI-2. Variation of physically adsorbed (Pp) and chemically adsorbed (Pc) segments as a function of time for cyclic polymethylsiloxane adsorbing from CCI4 onto alumina (from Ref. 43). Note that the initial physisoiption is overcome by chemical adsorption as the final state is reached. [T. Cosgrove, C. A. Prestidge, and B. Vincent, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 86(9), 1377-1382 (1990). Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry.]... Fig. XI-2. Variation of physically adsorbed (Pp) and chemically adsorbed (Pc) segments as a function of time for cyclic polymethylsiloxane adsorbing from CCI4 onto alumina (from Ref. 43). Note that the initial physisoiption is overcome by chemical adsorption as the final state is reached. [T. Cosgrove, C. A. Prestidge, and B. Vincent, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 86(9), 1377-1382 (1990). Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry.]...
Thus, adding surfactants to minimize the oil-water and solid-water interfacial tensions causes removal to become spontaneous. On the other hand, a mere decrease in the surface tension of the water-air interface, as evidenced, say, by foam formation, is not a direct indication that the surfactant will function well as a detergent. The decrease in yow or ysw implies, through the Gibb s equation (see Section III-5) adsorption of detergent. [Pg.485]

These concluding chapters deal with various aspects of a very important type of situation, namely, that in which some adsorbate species is distributed between a solid phase and a gaseous one. From the phenomenological point of view, one observes, on mechanically separating the solid and gas phases, that there is a certain distribution of the adsorbate between them. This may be expressed, for example, as ria, the moles adsorbed per gram of solid versus the pressure P. The distribution, in general, is temperature dependent, so the complete empirical description would be in terms of an adsorption function ria = f(P, T). [Pg.571]

Thus D(r) is given by the slope of the V versus P plot. The same distribution function can be calculated from an analysis of vapor adsorption data showing hysteresis due to capillary condensation (see Section XVII-16). Joyner and co-woikers [38] found that the two methods gave very similar results in the case of charcoal, as illustrated in Fig. XVI-2. See Refs. 36 and 39 for more recent such comparisons. There can be some question as to what the local contact angle is [31,40] an error here would shift the distribution curve. [Pg.578]

As stated in the introduction to the previous chapter, adsorption is described phenomenologically in terms of an empirical adsorption function n = f(P, T) where n is the amount adsorbed. As a matter of experimental convenience, one usually determines the adsorption isotherm n = fr(P), in a detailed study, this is done for several temperatures. Figure XVII-1 displays some of the extensive data of Drain and Morrison [1]. It is fairly common in physical adsorption systems for the low-pressure data to suggest that a limiting adsorption is being reached, as in Fig. XVII-la, but for continued further adsorption to occur at pressures approaching the saturation or condensation pressure (which would be close to 1 atm for N2 at 75 K), as in Fig. XVII-Ih. [Pg.599]

The following derivation is modified from that of Fowler and Guggenheim [10,11]. The adsorbed molecules are considered to differ from gaseous ones in that their potential energy and local partition function (see Section XVI-4A) have been modified and that, instead of possessing normal translational motion, they are confined to localized sites without any interactions between adjacent molecules but with an adsorption energy Q. [Pg.606]

Thus the kinetic and statistical mechanical derivations may be brought into identity by means of a specific series of assumptions, including the assumption that the internal partition functions are the same for the two states (see Ref. 12). As discussed in Section XVI-4A, this last is almost certainly not the case because as a minimum effect some loss of rotational degrees of freedom should occur on adsorption. [Pg.609]

A fundamental approach by Steele [8] treats monolayer adsorption in terms of interatomic potential functions, and includes pair and higher order interactions. Young and Crowell [11] and Honig [20] give additional details on the general subject a recent treatment is by Rybolt [21]. [Pg.615]

A monolayer can be regarded as a special case in which the potential is a square well however, the potential well may take other forms. Of particular interest now is the case of multilayer adsorption, and a reasonable assumption is that the principal interaction between the solid and the adsorbate is of the dispersion type, so that for a plane solid surface the potential should decrease with the inverse cube of the distance (see Section VI-3A). To avoid having an infinite potential at the surface, the potential function may be written... [Pg.627]

Equation XVII-78 turns out to ht type II adsorption isotherms quite well—generally better than does the BET equation. Furthermore, the exact form of the potential function is not very critical if an inverse square dependence is used, the ht tends to be about as good as with the inverse-cube law, and the equation now resembles that for a condensed him in Table XVII-2. Here again, quite similar equations have resulted from deductions based on rather different models. [Pg.628]

Thus from an adsorption isotherm and its temperature variation, one can calculate either the differential or the integral entropy of adsorption as a function of surface coverage. The former probably has the greater direct physical meaning, but the latter is the quantity usually first obtained in a statistical thermodynamic adsorption model. [Pg.645]

Returning to multilayer adsorption, the potential model appears to be fundamentally correct. It accounts for the empirical fact that systems at the same value of / rin P/F ) are in essentially corresponding states, and that the multilayer approaches bulk liquid in properties as P approaches F. However, the specific treatments must be regarded as still somewhat primitive. The various proposed functions for U r) can only be rather approximate. Even the general-appearing Eq. XVn-79 cannot be correct, since it does not allow for structural perturbations that make the film different from bulk liquid. Such perturbations should in general be present and must be present in the case of liquids that do not spread on the adsorbent (Section X-7). The last term of Eq. XVII-80, while reasonable, represents at best a semiempirical attempt to take structural perturbation into account. [Pg.654]


See other pages where Functional adsorption is mentioned: [Pg.309]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.754]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.649]    [Pg.842]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.754]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.649]    [Pg.842]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.646]   


SEARCH



Adsorption and Work-Function Studies

Adsorption and work function

Adsorption continuous function

Adsorption energy distribution function

Adsorption entropy functions

Adsorption excess functions

Adsorption from Solution and Effects of Surface Functionalities

Adsorption functional group character

Adsorption functions

Adsorption of end-functionalized polymers

Adsorption onto Functionalized Surfaces

Adsorption stepwise function

Adsorption thermodynamic functions

Adsorption work function changes

Adsorptivity as a function

Contact adsorption and work function

Density functional theory adsorption

Density functional theory adsorption energy

Density functional theory adsorption models

Density functional theory adsorption modes

Density functional theory hydrogen adsorption

Distribution function of adsorption energy

Effects of Surface Functionalities on Adsorption

Effects of Surface Functionalities on Gas Adsorption

Functionalized homopolymers, adsorption

Polymeric Materials with Ionic Functional Groups and Their Protein Adsorptive Behavior

Surface functional groups adsorption isotherms, effects

Work function adsorption induced

© 2024 chempedia.info