Free polymer samples

Melissaris et al. developed a medium pressure (500-1000 psi) molding process for these monomers and successfully produced a void-free polymer sample made from the monomer powder. Hardened samples have a flexural storage modulus of 4.5 to 4.8 GPa. The coefficient of thermal expansion was 2.0 x IQ-Soc-i Cured samples had good thermal stability with 5% weight loss temperatures above 400°C in air. 

A further feature of anionic polymerisation is that, under very carefully controlled eonditions, it may be possible to produee a polymer sample which is virtually monodisperse, i.e. the molecules are all of the same size. This is in contrast to free-radical polymerisations which, because of the randomness of both chain initiation and termination, yield polymers with a wide molecular size distribution, i.e. they are said to be polydisperse. In order to produce monodisperse polymers it is necessary that the following requirements be met ... 

In the analysis of polymer surfaces and interfaces there has been tremendous progress in recent years. This is to a large extent due to the development of surface- and interface-sensitive analytical techniques which previously had not been applied to polymers. It is thus possible to achieve molecular resolution both for the free polymer surface and for buried interfaces between polymers. In addition, suitable sample preparation techniques are available and extremely homogeneous and smooth polymer thin films can be prepared. They may be put together to investigate the interface between polymers. 

In order to validate sliding spark spectrometry results, plastic material was collected and the element concentration was determined via AAS after digestion. The samples were used as calibration standards. Additional standards were obtained by manufacturing known amounts of additives in the polymer matrix. Calibrations were made for Cd, Cr, Pb, Zn, Sb, Si and Ti in chlorine-free polymers Al, Ba, Ca, Cd, Pb, Sn, Ti, Zn in PVC chlorine (as PVC) and bromine in polyurethane (PUR). A calibration curve for Br as a flame retardant in PUR is shown in Figure 8.5. 

Instrumentation. Fourier transform infrared (FUR) spectra were recorded on a Nicolet 5DX using standard techniques. Spectra were measured from various sample supports, including KBR pellets, free polymer films and films cast on NaCl windows. Spectra for quantitative analysis were recorded in the absorbance mode. The height of the 639 cm 1 absorbance was measured after the spectrum was expanded or contracted such that the 829 cm 1 absorbance was a constant height. In some spectra an artifact due to instrumental response appeared near 2300 cm 1. 

The usefulness of the ultracentrifuge in the preparation of samples rather than in the production of analytic data should not be overlooked. Preparative ultracentrifuges have utility in fractionating polymer samples and in freeing them from easily sedimented impurities. 

The method is based on the fact that the rate of conformational change required for excimer formation depends on the free volume induced by the segmental motions of the polymer occurring above the glass transition. DIPHANT (compound 3 in Figure 8.3) was used as an excimer-forming probe of three polymer samples consisting of polybutadiene, polyisoprene and poly(dimethylsiloxane).a)... 

The polymer samples should be free from impurities including monomers, water, and solvent. The polymer sample should be homogeneous and of a large surface area (see Notes 1 and 2). 

Prepare the polymer samples for the cold drawing experiment by cutting six to eight specimens about 2 mm X 2 to 3 cm from the film described in the preceding section. Exact width is unimportant, but the samples must have a constant width and edges must be free from nicks or irregularities. 

Oven testing was performed using 0.4 g of a selected polymer sample that were dissolved in screening formulation (20.00 g) and then applied to white coil-coat aluminum and baked in an oven at 160°C for 30 minutes and a tack free dry film with a thickness of approximately 25 cm obtained. After curing for 45 minutes, the pendulum hardness testing was conducted and results summarized in Table 3. 

New methods for non-destructive quantitative analysis of additives based on MIR spectra and multivariate calibration have been presented [67, 68], One of the limitations in the determination of additive levels by MIR spectroscopy is encountered in the detection limit of this technique, which is usually above the low concentration of additive present, due to their heavy dilution in the polymer matrix. The samples are thin polymer films with small variations in thickness (due to errors in sample preparation). The differences in thickness cause a shift in spectra and if not eliminated or reduced they may produce non-reliable results. Methods for spectral normalisation become necessary. These methods were reviewed and compared by Karstang et al. [68]. MIR is more specific than UV but the antioxidant content may be too low to give a suitable spectrum [69]. However, this difficulty can be overcome by using an additive-free polymer in the reference beam [67, 68, 69, 70]. On the other hand, UV and MIR have been successfully applied to quantify additives in polymer extracts [71, 72, 66]. 

Figure 10-10 HPLC chromatograms of phosgene-free polycarbonate samples derived with 2-amino-phenol as a function of time (a) sample after 2 hours, (b) sample after 13 hours, (c) polymer blank, (d) reagent blank.

Several applications of scanning force microscopy (SFM) and related techniques in polymer science have been given in the above sections. The reviewed results were gathered from surfaces of cross-sectioned bulk polymers, polymer-matrix composites, and polymer blends as well as free surfaces of polymer samples such as films, or surfaces prepared by means of replica techniques. The materials contrasts reported on range from several mechanical ones via thermal to electrical ones. 

---