General surfactant aqueous formulations

The experimental technique used to find an optimum formulation, known a.s untdimensional scan, goes on as follows. Series of surfactant-oil-water. systems are prepared in test tubes, all with identical composition, and with the same formulation with the exception of the scanned variable, that is in general the aqueous phase salinity for ionic systems, and the average number of ethylene oxide groups per molecule (EON) if the systems contain an ethoxylated nonionic surfactant mixture. 

Structured Surfactant Formulations take advantage of basic aqueous surfiictant phase behavior. Figure 1 shows a schematic of general surfiictant aqueous equilibrium phase behavior as a function of sur ctant concentration. 

In a multiphase formulation, such as an oil-in-water emulsion, preservative molecules will distribute themselves in an unstable equilibrium between the bulk aqueous phase and (i) the oil phase by partition, (ii) the surfactant micelles by solubilization, (iii) polymeric suspending agents and other solutes by competitive displacement of water of solvation, (iv) particulate and container surfaces by adsorption and, (v) any microorganisms present. Generally, the overall preservative efficiency can be related to the small proportion of preservative molecules remaining unbound in the bulk aqueous phase, although as this becomes depleted some slow re-equilibration between the components can be anticipated. The loss of neutral molecules into oil and micellar phases may be favoured over ionized species, although considerable variation in distribution is found between different systems. 

Isaacs and Smolek [211 observed that low tensions obtained for an Athabasca bitumen/brine-suIfonate surfactant system were likely associated with the formation of a surfactant-rich film lying between the oil and water, which can be hindered by an increase in temperature. Babu et al. [221 obtained little effect of temperature on interfacial tensions however, values of about 0.02 mN/m were obtained for a light crude (39°API), and were about an order of magnitude lower than those observed for a heavy crude (14°API) with the same aqueous surfactant formulations. For pure hydrocarbon phases and ambient conditions, it is well established that the interfacial tension behavior is dependent on the oleic phase [15.231 In general, interfacial tension values of crude oiI-containing systems are considerably higher than the equivalent values observed with pure hydrocarbons. 

The maximum additive concentration (MAC) is defined as the maximum amount of solubilisate, at a given concentration of surfactant, that produces a clear solution. Different amounts of solubilisates, in ascending order, are added to a series of vials containing the known concentration of surfactant and mixed until equilibrium is reached. The maximum concentration of solubilisate that forms a clear solution is then determined visually. This same procedure can be repeated for the different concentrations of surfactant in a known amount of solubilisate in order to determine the optimum concentration of surfactant (Figure 4.24). Based on this information, one can construct a ternary phase diagram that describes the effects of three constituents (i.e., solubilisate, surfactant, and water) on the micelle system. Note that unwanted phase transitions can be avoided by ignoring the formulation compositions near the boundary. In general, the MAC increases with an increase in temperature. This may be due to the combination of the increase of solubilisate solubility in the aqueous phase and the micellar phase rather than an increased solubilization by the micelles alone. 

Formulation essentially relates to the content of the systems and generally not to the way it is attained if thermodynamically stable systems are considered. The simplest microemulsion system would contain an organic oil phase (O), an aqueous phase generally referred to as water (W), and a surfactant (S) at a given temperature (T) and pressure (p). This means that at least five variables are required to describe the system. In practice, the situation is much more complicated. Water always contains electrolytes. Moreover, oils as well as nearly all commercial surfactants are mixtures. In most cases, particularly with ionic surfactant systems, a co-surfactant (e.g. an alcohol (A)) is added, among other functions, to reduce the rigidity of the surfactant layer and thus to prevent the formation of gel-like mesophases. 

The phenomenon of microemulsification is mainly governed by factors such as (1) nature and concentration of the oil, surfactant, co-surfactant and aqueous phase, (2) oil/surfactant and surfactant/co-surfactant ratio, (3) temperature, (4) pH of the environment and (5) physicochemical properties of the API such as hydrophilicity/lipophilicity, plformulating microemulsions. From a pharmaceutical perspective, one of the most important factors to be considered is acceptability of the oil, surfactant and co-surfactant for the desired route of administration. This factor is very important while developing micro emulsions for parenteral and ocular delivery as there is only limited number of excipients which are approved for the parenteral and ocular route. In Chapter 3 of this book a more general overview of formulating microemulsions is given and formulation considerations with respect to the components of microemulsions used in pharmaceutical applications are discussed below. 

---