Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Formalism and model

ADVANCES IN QUANTUM CHEMISTRY, VOLUME 48 ISSN 0065-3276 DOI I0.1016/S0065-3276(05)48003-X [Pg.24]

In this section, we describe our model, and give a brief, self-contained account on the equations of the non-equilibrium Green function formalism. This is closely related to the electron and particle-hole propagators, which have been at the heart of Jens electronic structure research [7,8]. For more detailed and more general analysis, see some of the many excellent references [9-15]. We restrict ourselves to the study of stationary transport, and work in energy representation. We assume the existence of a well-defined self-energy. The aim is to solve the Dyson and the Keldysh equations for the electronic Green functions  [Pg.25]

Once the Green functions have been obtained, together with the self-energies, they allow calculation of the quantities of interest. In particular, the spectral function is given as [Pg.26]

The diagonal elements of the spectral function yield the local DOS at the corresponding site, while their sum, the trace, yields the DOS  [Pg.27]

The current transmitted through the junction is given as an integral of the flux of electrons at the source (or, equivalently, at the emitter) over different energies  [Pg.27]


TTie three categories represent an increasing degree of formalism and modelling sophistication. The choice of method depends on the purpose of the smdy, the need for resolution, input data available, etc. [Pg.433]

T. B. Freedman and L. A. Nafie, in Non-Linear Optics, Part 3. M. Evans and S. Kielich, Eds., Advances in Chemical Physics Series, Vol LXXXV, John Wiley Sons, New York, 1994, pp. 207-263. Theoretical Formalism and Models for Vibrational Circular Dichroism Intensities. [Pg.296]

The hydration dependence studies of the internal protein dynamics of hen egg white lysozyme by and H NMR relaxation have been presented. The relaxation times were quantitatively analysed by the well-established correlation function formalism and model-free approach. The obtained data was described by a model based on three types of motion having correlation times around 10 , 10 and 10 s. The slowest process was shown to originate from correlated conformational transitions between different energy minima. The intermediate process was attributed to librations within one energy minimum, and the fastest one was identified as a fast rotation of methyl protons around the symmetry axis of methyl groups. A comparison of the dynamic behaviour of lysozyme and polylysine obtained from a previous study revealed that in the dry state both biopolymers are rigid on both fast and slow time scales. Upon hydration, lysozyme and polylysine showed a considerable enhancement of the internal mobility. The side chain fragments of polylysine were more mobile than those of lysozyme, whereas the backbone of lysozyme was found to be more mobile than that of polylysine. [Pg.293]

The best fit, as measured by statistics, was achieved by one participant in the International Workshop on Kinetic Model Development (1989), who completely ignored all kinetic formalities and fitted the data by a third order spline function. While the data fit well, his model didn t predict temperature runaway at all. Many other formal models made qualitatively correct runaway predictions, some even very close when compared to the simulation using the true kinetics. [Pg.121]

Many designers consider risk assessment to be an intuitive element of their work. ITowever, a formal process model that makes risks explicit, and stresses accountability, can only be an advantage. [Pg.261]

When the temperature of the analyzed sample is increased continuously and in a known way, the experimental data on desorption can serve to estimate the apparent values of parameters characteristic for the desorption process. To this end, the most simple Arrhenius model for activated processes is usually used, with obvious modifications due to the planar nature of the desorption process. Sometimes, more refined models accounting for the surface mobility of adsorbed species or other specific points are applied. The Arrhenius model is to a large extent merely formal and involves three effective (apparent) parameters the activation energy of desorption, the preexponential factor, and the order of the rate-determining step in desorption. As will be dealt with in Section II. B, the experimental arrangement is usually such that the primary records reproduce essentially either the desorbed amount or the actual rate of desorption. After due correction, the output readings are converted into a desorption curve which may represent either the dependence of the desorbed amount on the temperature or, preferably, the dependence of the desorption rate on the temperature. In principle, there are two approaches to the treatment of the desorption curves. [Pg.346]

In this mentoring model, individuals are asked to take on the responsibility for their own career development with the help of a range of formal and informal advisory relationships that they find and foster for themselves. The following quotation from Kerka (1998) summarizes the trends and issues facing mentoring in a time of organizational uncertainty ... [Pg.122]

By writing models up front, we identify these major ingredients. The more formality and precision we achieve now, the more we clarify the picture and ensure we haven t missed or mistaken any important ingredients and hence that we don t make a cake of it further down the line, when changes will be more expensive. Anyone writing formal models soon discovers that more questions are raised and clarified in the first afternoon of a modeling workshop than are often raised in a traditional development until the code has been written. [Pg.221]

As you formalize the action specifications, you will find that the static types adopted from the business model contain superfluous information in some parts and inadequate information in others. Notions such as currently logged-in user are relevant only to a computer system. Adapt the model as required but the changes should be extensions and deletions rather than alterations. If you find yourself altering something, it is probably a mistake in the business model that you should fix or it may be that you are dealing with a slightly different concept, in which case you should give it a different name and model it separately. [Pg.231]

Make a business model (see Pattern 14.2, Make a Business Model), including associations and use cases, in which you reflect the existing process. This example is merely a sketch, less formal and less comprehensive than would be useful. [Pg.567]

This chapter aims to present the fundamental formal and exact relations between polarizabilities and other DFT descriptors and is organized as follows. For pedagogical reasons, we present first the polarizability responses for simple models in Section 24.2. In particular, we introduce a new concept the dipole atomic hardnesses (Equation 24.20). The relationship between polarizability and chemical reactivity is described in Section 24.3. In this section, we clarify the relationship between the different Fukui functions and the polarizabilities, we introduce new concepts as, for instance, the polarization Fukui function, and the interacting Fukui function and their corresponding hardnesses. The formulation of the local softness for a fragment in a molecule and its relation to polarization is also reviewed in detail. Generalization of the polarizability and chemical responses to an arbitrary perturbation order is summarized in Section 24.4. [Pg.335]

Evidence relevant to the phase stability problem has been given by Massalski (1989). The so-called compound energy formalism was constructed by Hillert and Staffansson (1970) in order to describe models of the thermodynamic properties of phases with two or more sublattices showing a variation in composition, which therefore belong to the class of solution phases. A review of this formalism and a summary of its applications have been recently published by Hillert (2001) and Frisk and Selleby (2001). [Pg.70]

We extend the model of Section 4.5 by one aspect. The adsorbent molecules now consist of two identical subunits, each having one site. The subimit itself can be in one of two conformations, L or H. Hence, altogether there are four possible states for the entire empty adsorbent molecule LL, LH, HL, and HH. Formally, this model extends the model of Section 4.5 in allowing the four states instead of two. In this respect all the results of the previous model apply also to this model, and in some special cases (rj — 0, see below) the two models actually become identical. [Pg.100]

To see for yourself how chemists write Methods sections for journal articles, we have included excerpts from the published literature throughout this chapter. These excerpts illustrate appropriate levels of detail, formality, and conciseness when writing for expert chemists. We encourage you to use these excerpts (rather than lab reports or lab manuals) as models for your writing. [Pg.61]

When observed structure factors are used, the thermally averaged deformation density, often labeled the dynamic deformation density, is obtained. An attractive alternative is to replace the observed structure factors in Eq. (5.8) by those calculated with the multipole model. The resulting dynamic model deformation map is model dependent, but any noise not fitted by the muitipole functions will be eliminated. It is also possible to plot the model density directly using the model functions and the experimental charge density parameters. In that case, thermal motion can be eliminated (subject to the approximations of the thermal motion formalism ), and an image of the static model deformation density is obtained, as discussed further in section 5.2.4. [Pg.94]

Scamehorn et. al. (19) reported the adsorption isotherms for a binary mixture of anionic surfactants. A formal adsorption model developed for single surfactant systems ( ) was extended to this binary system and shown to accurately describe the mixed adsorption isotherms (19). That theoretically based model was very complex and is probably not feasible to extend beyond two surfactant components. [Pg.203]


See other pages where Formalism and model is mentioned: [Pg.24]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.2555]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.201]   


SEARCH



Model formalism

© 2024 chempedia.info