Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Formaldehyde, production byproducts

Several reaction schemes have been proposed to explain tee formation of all byproducts during methanol oxidation over Mo-Fe catalysts. Edwards et al [5] and Machiels [6] have suggested reactional mechanisms for tee formation of formaldehyde and by-products. However intermediate speeies proposed in such mechanisms have not been identift by any spectroscopic or other techniques. More recently Busca [7] on basis of infrared studies of surface intermediates species has proposed a rake-type mechanism for methanol oxidation over oxide catalysts. This mechanism account for the formation of formaldehyde and byproducts. [Pg.489]

Occupational and environmental exposure to chemicals can take place both indoors and outdoors. Occupational exposure is caused by the chemicals that are used and produced indoors in industrial plants, whereas nonoccupa-tional (and occupational nonindustrial) indoor exposure is mainly caused by products. Toluene in printing plants and styrene in the reinforced plastic industry are typical examples of the two types of industrial occupational exposures. Products containing styrene polymers may release the styrene monomer into indoor air in the nonindustrial environment for a long time. Formaldehyde is another typical indoor pollutant. The source of formaldehyde is the resins used in the production process. During accidents, occupational and environmental exposures may occur simultaneously. Years ago, dioxin was formed as a byproduct of production of phenoxy acid herbicides. An explosion in a factory in... [Pg.255]

Figure 1 Effect of the solution pH on yields to vanillols (u), monoaiyl byproducts (v) and diaryl by-products (cj). Top formalin with 15 wt.% methanol. Bottom formalin with 1 wt.% methanol. The pH has been varied by addition of controlled amounts of H2S04. Reaction temperature 80°C, reaction time 1 h, molar ratio formaldehyde/guaiacol 18. Figure 1 Effect of the solution pH on yields to vanillols (u), monoaiyl byproducts (v) and diaryl by-products (cj). Top formalin with 15 wt.% methanol. Bottom formalin with 1 wt.% methanol. The pH has been varied by addition of controlled amounts of H2S04. Reaction temperature 80°C, reaction time 1 h, molar ratio formaldehyde/guaiacol 18.
A new mechanism, called the methane-formaldehyde mechanism, has been put forward for the transformation of the equilibrium mixture of methanol and dimethyl ether, that is, for the formation of the first C-C bond.643 This, actually, is a modification of the carbocation mechanism that suggested the formation of ethanol by methanol attaching to the incipient carbocation CH3+ from surface methoxy.460,462 This mechanism (Scheme 3.3) is consistent with experimental observations and indicates that methane is not a byproduct and ethanol is the initial product in the first C-C bond formation. Trimethyloxonium ion, proposed to be an intermediate in the formation of ethyl methyl ether,447 was proposed to be excluded as an intermediate for the C-C bond formation.641 The suggested role of impurities in methanol as the reason for ethylene formation is highly speculative and unsubstantiated. [Pg.137]

Here again, loss of Y = H would result in rearomatization and formation of 12, but in the case of Y = Me, this cannot occur. However, assistance by the amine nitrogen lone pair can aid the rearomatization process, producing the copper-bound phenol product and an imininm salt. Hydrolysis during the workup procedure could release the 2-meth-ylphenol product and result in a retro-Mannich reaction to give the observed secondary amine (PY2) and formaldehyde. A small amount (<10%) of N—Me—PY2 is often observed as a byproduct and its yield is at the expense of the PY2 and formaldehyde thus, it appears to be derived from direct reduction of the intermediate iminium salt [167],... [Pg.517]

In the process (Fig. 2), the main concern in mixing is to avoid loss of temperature control in this exothermic reaction, which can lead to excessive byproduct formation and/or reduced yields of pentaerythritol. The reaction time depends on the reaction temperature and may vary from about 0.5 to 4 hours at final temperatures of about 65 and 35°C, respectively. The reactor product, neutralized with acetic or formic acid, is then stripped of excess formaldehyde and water to produce a highly concentrated solution of pentaerythritol reaction products. This is then cooled under carefully controlled crystallization conditions so that the crystals can be readily separated from the liquors by subsequent filtration. [Pg.376]

Xylose Modified Phenol-Formaldehyde Resins. Xylose (I) and byproducts streams containing xylose (e.g., wood prehydrolysates from the production of chemical pulps and waste liquors from the wet process for hardboard production) are readily available. Our previous experiments (2) showed that free reducing sugars are not acceptable modifiers for phenol-formaldehyde resins cured under basic conditions. [Pg.356]

For the ozonolysis of linear alkenes only alk-l-encs should be used to avoid product mixtures as the resulting formaldehyde or formic acid are readily separated. This type of reaction is also a successful method for the preparation of perfluorinated carboxylic acids.The advantage over the oxidation with potassium permanganate is that the process does not form solid byproducts which are diflicult to separate. A disadvantage of this procedure is the fact that two reaction steps arc needed to obtain the required product. [Pg.698]

The anchored Cr(VI) species are not themselves the sites for the propagation reaction in PE formation. In the industrial procedure, the formation of the active centers takes place by direct contacting of the Cr(VI) species with ethene at 373-423 K. The polymerization starts after an induction period, which is attributed to a reduction phase, during which Cr(VI) is reduced to Cr(II), and ethene is oxidized (3,182). Formaldehyde has been found to be the main byproduct, but water and other oxidation products have also been observed in the gas phase (194). These reactive products can themselves react with surface silanols and siloxane bridges, and also with the reduced chromium sites. Consequently, the state of the silica surface and the chromium species after this reduction step is not well known (3). [Pg.50]

Chemical analysis permits us to control the loss of any kind of groups participating in the hardening of binders either directly or upon the release of the byproducts of the reaction (by observing the loss of the methylol groups or the release of such low-molecular products as water and formaldehyde). [Pg.48]

Properties of formaldehyde, properties of byproducts, disposal of waste products -this can be rather (fifficult )n the case of the formaldehyde process. [Pg.949]

Pross et al. (1987) evaluated the immunologic response of asthmatic subjects exposed to UFFI off-gas products. Subjects consisted of 23 individuals with a history of asthmatic symptoms attributed to UFFI and 4 individuals with asthma unrelated to UFFI byproducts. All subjects were exposed to the following in an environmental chamber room air (placebo) for 30 minutes 1 ppm formaldehyde gas for 3 hours ... [Pg.95]

On the other hand, formaldehyde is a byproduct of human activities. It is a combustion product it is in cigarette smoke, in wood combustion, and in natural gas flames. Urban air contains between 10 and 1,000 mg/m of aldehydes, depending on location. Typical concentrations are shown in Table I ... [Pg.210]

Product streams consist of nitrogen (50%), hydrogen (15%), water vapor (20%), formaldehyde (15%), and minor amounts of byproducts. Formaldehyde is condensed by passing the reactor effluent through a partial condenser. The resulting gas-liquid stream is subsequently fed to the absorber, such as to minimize the formaldehyde content in the tail gas and maximize the formaldehyde content in the product liquid leaving the absorber. [Pg.137]

The second synthesis is based on the conversion of undecanal into 2-methylene-undecanal by reaction with formaldehyde in the presence of catalytic amounts of amines [15]. Hydrogenation of 2-methyleneundecanal yields methylnonylacetaldehyde. A convenient process starts from 1-decene hydroformylation gives a mixture consisting mainly of undecanal and 2-methyldecanal. Reaction of the crude product with formaldehyde in the presence of dibutylamine yields a mixture containing over 50% 2-methyleneundecanal. After hydrogenation of the double bond, pure 2-methylundecanal is separated from byproducts by fractional distillation [16]. [Pg.14]

The main products are ethylene oxide, carbon dioxide, and water. Small amounts of acetaldehyde and formaldehyde are also produced as byproducts. [Pg.135]

The catalyst for the oxygen-based process has a selectivity of ethylene to ethylene oxide which varies with different licensors between 70 and 80%. A selectivity of 75% is used in carrying out the following material balance calculation. The balance of the ethylene forms a small amount of byproducts, acetaldehyde and formaldehyde, but the primary by-product is carbon dioxide. For simplification it is assumed that the balance of the ethylene forms carbon dioxide. The following equations apply ... [Pg.141]

Abundant byproducts of the Coalite process were also low temperature tars, containing cresylic acids (cresols the products were referred to as meta cresol and cresylic acid). With the sudden increase in the price of phenol around 1937, and further rises in 1938, both as a result of demand from the plastics industry (despite a general downturn in trade), it was suggested that Low Temperature Carbonisation Ltd. investigate catalysts suited to condensations of cresylic acids (as an alternative to phenol) with formaldehyde. Certainly there was a greater dependence in Britain on cresylics than was the case in the United States, because of their availability from coal-based processes. In the meantime Monsanto, which manufactured coal tar cresols (as did Yorkshire Tar Distillers), was considering the erection of a second British synthetic phenol plant. [Pg.196]


See other pages where Formaldehyde, production byproducts is mentioned: [Pg.431]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.1275]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.945]    [Pg.743]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.689]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.185 ]




SEARCH



Byproducts

Formaldehyde production

Formaldehyde products

© 2024 chempedia.info