Flash and Evaporation

FIGURE 2.17. Two common liquid-release situations dependent on the normal boiling point of the liquid. Aerosol formation is also possible for Case B if the release velocities are high. 

If the liquid is not superheated, but has a high vapor pressure (volatile), then vapor emissions will arise from surface evaporation from the resulting pools. The total emission rate may be high depending on the volatility of the liquid and the total surface area of the pool. An example is a release of liquid toluene, benzene or alcohol. 

For liquids which exit a process as a jet, flow instabilities may cause the stream to break up into droplets before it impacts the ground. The size of the resulting droplets and the rate of air entrainment in the jet, as well as the initial temperature of the liquid, influence the evaporation rate of the droplets while in flight. The time of flight (drop trajectories) influences the fraction of the release which rains out, evaporates, or remains in the aerosol/vapor cloud (DeVatill et al., 1995). 

If the liquid released is not superheated, but relatively volatile, then the vapor loading is due to evaporation. The evaporation rate is proportional to the surface area of the pool and the vapor pressure of the liquid, and can be significant for large pools. These models are primarily dominated by mass transfer effects. Wind and solar radiation can also affect the evaporation rate. 

Both empirical and pscudomechanistic models based on heat and mass transfer concepts are available and are based on the thermodynamic properties of the liquid and, for the boiling pool, on the thermal properties of the substrate (c.g., groimd). Vaporization rates may vary greatly with time. The dimensions of the vapor cloud formed over the pool are often required as input to some dense gas dispersion models (Section 2.3.2) this is empirical and is not provided by most models. 

---

Discharge Flash and evaporation, Dispersion by neutral or positive hiuiyt. t. cy. Dense u i, ... 

Source models are used to quantitatively define the release scenario by estimating discharge rates (Section 2.1), total quantity released (or total release duration), extent of flash and evaporation from a liquid pool (Section 2.2), and aerosol formation (Section 2.2). Dispersion models convert the source term outputs to concentration fields downwind from the source (Section 2.3). The relationship between source and dispersion models, and the various model types, is shown schematically in Figure 2.1. As shown in Figure 2.1, source and dispersion models are highly coupled, with the results of the source model being used to select the appropriate dispersion model. 

The purpose of flash and evaporation models is to estimate the total vapor or vapor rate that forms a cloud, for use as input to dispersion models as shown in Figure 1.3 and Figure 2.1. 

Spilling of liquids is common during loss of containment incidents in the chemical process industries. Thus, flash and evaporation models are essential in CPQRA. The Rijnmond smdy (Rijnmond Public Authority, 1982) provides good examples of the use of flash and evaporation models. Wu and Schroy (1979) show how evaporation models may he applied to spills. 

If a linear mbber is used as a feedstock for the mass process (85), the mbber becomes insoluble in the mixture of monomers and SAN polymer which is formed in the reactors, and discrete mbber particles are formed. This is referred to as phase inversion since the continuous phase shifts from mbber to SAN. Grafting of some of the SAN onto the mbber particles occurs as in the emulsion process. Typically, the mass-produced mbber particles are larger (0.5 to 5 llm) than those of emulsion-based ABS (0.1 to 1 llm) and contain much larger internal occlusions of SAN polymer. The reaction recipe can include polymerization initiators, chain-transfer agents, and other additives. Diluents are sometimes used to reduce the viscosity of the monomer and polymer mixture to faciUtate processing at high conversion. The product from the reactor system is devolatilized to remove the unreacted monomers and is then pelletized. Equipment used for devolatilization includes single- and twin-screw extmders, and flash and thin film evaporators. Unreacted monomers are recovered for recycle to the reactors to improve the process yield. 

Fig. 4. The 341,000-m /d multistage flash (MSF) evaporation desalination plant A1 Taweelah B in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Courtesy of Italimpianti SpA. It is a dual-purpose plant, composed of six identical power and desalination units. The desalination units at 56,800 m /d each are currently (1997) the largest ia the world. They have 17 recovery and 3 reject stages and a Performance Ratio of 8 1. The plant also produces 732 MWe of...

This material Is purified by recrystallization from ethyl acetate acetone 2 1 (v v) to give a first crop (6.8 g), and by flash chromatography of the residue from the mother liquor, using 150 g of 230-400 mesh silica gel (Merck), a 40-mm diameter column, and elution with 10 1 (v v) ethyl acetate methanol. A fast moving orange band and a slower moving lemon-yellow band can be clearly seen on the column. The lemon-yellow hand is collected from the column and evaporation gives a second crop (1.4 g) of comparably pure material. The total yield of the pale yellow isoquinoline is 8.2 g (86t), mp 135-137°C (Note 10). 

Evaporation. The process of evaporation or distillation in the past was carried out in submerged-tube evaporators. These have been superseded by flash-type evaporators, which are more economical to run and reduce scale problems. The prcKess is suitable for brackish water, where the cost of chemical methods is excessive. The resulting distilled water is not palatable and re quires aeration to make it potable. 

Note that due to flashing and formation of a vapor-liquid mixture, the control valve is always placed as close to the inlet of the evaporator as possible. 

I2 (0.0267 g, 0.21 mmol) in THF (1 mL) was added to a suspension of the mercury derivative 17 (0.0093 g. 0.016 mmol) in THF. The mixture was added to H20 (2 mL) and the resulting suspension was extracted with EtzO (2x5 mL). The combined extracts were washed with H20 (2 mL), dried (MgSQ4) and evaporated. The oily residue was submitted to flash chromatography (petroleum ether) yield 4.5 mg (89%) yellow-orange crystals mp 62 — 63 C (Et20/petroleum ether). 

To a solution of LDA [prepared from 21 mmol of 1.4 M BuLi in hexanes and 2.94 mL (21 mmol) of diisopropylamine] in 75 lnL of THF at 0CC is added dropwise over 10 min a solution of 2.83 mL (26.7 mmol) of methyl (E)-2-butenoate in 25 mL of THF. After 3 min. 40 mL of sat. aq NH4CI are added and the mixture is warmed to i t. The mixture is then poured into 100 mL of HzO and extracted with three 100-mL portions of ( 112C12. The combined extracts are dried over MgS04, filtered and evaporated in vacuo. Flash chromatography (silica gel, petroleum ether/ethyl acetate 2 1) gives the product yield 4.039 g (68%). 

---