Flash and evaporation models

The purpose of flash and evaporation models is to estimate the total vapor or vapor rate that forms a cloud, for use as input to dispersion models as shown in Figure 1.3 and Figure 2.1. 

Spilling of liquids is common during loss of containment incidents in the chemical process industries. Thus, flash and evaporation models are essential in CPQRA. The Rijnmond smdy (Rijnmond Public Authority, 1982) provides good examples of the use of flash and evaporation models. Wu and Schroy (1979) show how evaporation models may he applied to spills. 

Source models are used to quantitatively define the release scenario by estimating discharge rates (Section 2.1), total quantity released (or total release duration), extent of flash and evaporation from a liquid pool (Section 2.2), and aerosol formation (Section 2.2). Dispersion models convert the source term outputs to concentration fields downwind from the source (Section 2.3). The relationship between source and dispersion models, and the various model types, is shown schematically in Figure 2.1. As shown in Figure 2.1, source and dispersion models are highly coupled, with the results of the source model being used to select the appropriate dispersion model. 

Equilibritun flash models for superheated liquids are based on thermodynamic theory. However, estimates of the aerosol fraction entrained in the resultant cloud are mostly empirical or semiempirical. Most evaporation models are based on the solution of time dependent heat and mass balances. Momentum transfer is typically ignored. Pool spreading models are based primarily on the opposing forces of gravity and flow resistance and typically assume a smooth, horizontal surface. 

CASRAM predicts discharge fractions, flash-entrainment quantities, and liquid pool evaporation rates used as input to the model s dispersion algorithm to estimate chemical hazard population exposure zones. The output of CASRAM is a deterministic estimate of the hazard zone (to estimate an associated population health risk value) or the probability distributions of hazard-zones (which is used to estimate an associated distribution population health risk). 

After the flask containing the sodium borohydride solution has cooled for about half an hour, the tributyltin chloride solution is added dropwise with rapid stirring over a 30-minute period. A white sodium chloride precipitate forms as each drop of the tributyltin chloride solution is added. The reaction mixture is allowed to stand at —10 to — 11°C. for 10-15 minutes after the last of the tributyltin chloride solution has been added. Without filtration, the entire reaction mixture is now transferred cold under nitrogen or helium into a 1-1., single-necked, round-bottomed flask the flask is attached to a flash evaporator (Buchler Model PTFE-1G or equivalent) and immersed in a bath maintained at 0°C. The evaporator s receiving flask (also 1-1., single-necked, round-bottomed) is immersed in a — 80°C. bath of Dry Ice-acetone. 

The methods proposed in the literature to do so, e.g. spin-coating [9], thermal evaporation [10], chemical vapor deposition [11], flash evaporation [12], laser deposition [13] and r.f. reactive sputtering [14], are rather scarce and complex. Moreover, they are often more dedicated to the deposition of active phase on flat and/or monolithic supports (to produce model catalysts for surface science purposes) than on powder supports. These methods thus usually only allow the production of samples at a small scale, so that they are often inadequate for the production of pulverulent real catalysts in large amounts. 

Ratajczak and Labedzka (1977) and Ratajczak and Goscienska (1979,1980) studied the anomalous Hall hysteresis loops in the vicinity of Tcomp for flash-evaporated films. They showed the relation between magnetic domain structures and hysteresis loops at Tcomp- They explained the anomalous configurations in terms of film homogeneity and the magnetization reversal process. They propose a model of change in film composition and reject the one of magnetic... 

Here (L, L ) are latent heats [J kg ] of contaminant and water, respectively, and AH, is the heat of reaction in nonideal liquid mixtures, e.g., estimated by Wheatley s model. We neglect the kinetic energy term in Eq. (18.2) since this will be insignificant compared to the heat of evaporation, even in a flash-boiling jet (Nielsen et al., 1997). 

---